Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: JBL L166 poor bass

  1. #1
    Guglielmo
    Guest

    Question JBL L166 poor bass

    HI to all,

    I own since new a pair of JBL L166 Horizon whose Xover has been modified to accept a bi-amp set up. In facts an electronic Xover cuts @ 1000Hz the lower way from the upper so a Solid State 50W amp drives directly the woofer while a Vacuum Tube 40W amp the mid/tweeter. Obviously the passive Xover @ 6000Hz is retained.

    Since new the woofers performed very well with abundance of bass. After 15 or more years the bass become longer and boomy so I checked under the grilles and I discovered that both woofers were needing reboarding being the original board completely pulverized. A near technical lab took in care the woofer and so the bass started again to perform as new, just the time for the running-in to reach the optimal sound.

    Again after 15 years the woofers needed reboarding so this time I got the service from another "specialist" who aesthetically done a good job but from the first hours the bass seemed "dry", absent", too short, so I guesses that it was just a matter of time to break-in the suspension. Unfortunately more that one year is passed without better results, the only hope is that nowadays I don't have much time to listen to these JBLs preferring headphone use.

    I have to highlight too that few months ago I changed the 50W Solid State amp (woofer dedicated) to a 100W always SS but the bass results are poor: dry, lacking, dull without power even if I increase the bass amp gain or insist with the bass tones on the preamp...

    Question: perhaps the reboarding has not been done as required? May be utilizing some wrong suspension material? What else?

    Thanks a lot for help!

    Cheers,

    Guglielmo

  2. #2
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,754
    Assuming this is an electronic translation and you are referring to replacing the speaker surrounds, perhaps the second repair did use suspension material that is too stiff for the woofer? And assuming you've not changed the room position since the repair, there are only a few ways to make sure:

    1. Go back in time?
    2. Replace the 122A/1 woofers with known "correct" ones from another L166?
    3. Borrow a 128H or 128H-1 woofer from a donor L112, 4412/A, L150/A, or similar if you can find a willing owner and see what happens.



    Best of luck to you.
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  3. #3
    Guglielmo
    Guest
    BMWCCA,

    finding a willing owner for such a woofer is not easy, by the way the speaker position is always the same so may be you are right saying that the "new" suspension material is too stiff. A friend suggested me to insist in the "break-in" because till now the woofer worked not enough due to my preferred headphone listening...

  4. #4
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    I'm suspecting phase problems ... either internal or external. Correct L166's produce bountiful bass.

    check phasing (polarity) with battery ?
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  5. #5
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,754
    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    I'm suspecting phase problems ... either internal or external. Correct L166's produce bountiful bass.

    check phasing with battery ?

    That's likely a much better guess. I tend to blow right past the obvious.
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    416
    Actually I believe some L166 were "phased" factory by Jbl in reverse to what is customary. I had a pair of l166 that I did the battery test on woofer and it pushed "out" with positive battery terminal to negative post on woofer. My guess would be your woofer is "frozen" where the voice coil is not in the gap. You can test it just by lightly pushing on cone and check it it's "free" moving.

  7. #7
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,754
    Quote Originally Posted by script56 View Post
    Actually I believe some L166 were "phased" factory by Jbl in reverse to what is customary.
    As long as both woofers share the same polarity response, there should be no negative effect on bass performance, reversed or not.
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    416
    BMWCCA sounds right about stiff surrounds.

  9. #9
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by Guglielmo View Post
    HI to all,

    I own since new a pair of JBL L166 Horizon whose Xover has been modified to accept a bi-amp set up. In facts an electronic Xover cuts @ 1000Hz the lower way from the upper so a Solid State 50W amp drives directly the woofer while a Vacuum Tube 40W amp the mid/tweeter. Obviously the passive Xover @ 6000Hz is retained.

    Since new the woofers performed very well with abundance of bass. After 15 or more years the bass become longer and boomy so I checked under the grilles and I discovered that both woofers were needing reboarding being the original board completely pulverized. A near technical lab took in care the woofer and so the bass started again to perform as new, just the time for the running-in to reach the optimal sound.

    Again after 15 years the woofers needed reboarding so this time I got the service from another "specialist" who aesthetically done a good job but from the first hours the bass seemed "dry", absent", too short, so I guesses that it was just a matter of time to break-in the suspension. Unfortunately more that one year is passed without better results, the only hope is that nowadays I don't have much time to listen to these JBLs preferring headphone use.

    I have to highlight too that few months ago I changed the 50W Solid State amp (woofer dedicated) to a 100W always SS but the bass results are poor: dry, lacking, dull without power even if I increase the bass amp gain or insist with the bass tones on the preamp...

    Question: perhaps the reboarding has not been done as required? May be utilizing some wrong suspension material? What else?

    Thanks a lot for help!

    Cheers,

    Guglielmo
    Many of the forum members have been satisfied with Ric Cobb ( e-mail: [email protected] ) foams for JBL drivers...as

    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...l=1#post282407


    http://www.ebay.com/usr/looneytune2001

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/BEST-Speaker...item27c5251867

    Regrads
    ivica

  10. #10
    Senior Member Krunchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,224
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    Many of the forum members have been satisfied with Ric Cobb
    Yep! I got a set from him for my 166s, it was my first refoam job, easy enough & they still sound great.
    Just Play Music.

  11. #11
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,548
    Yep - did a pair of 2214s with Rick Cobb kits - had them upstairs so I could monitor them
    when I played the test tones after gluing the surrounds to the frame last weekend

    Name:  2214-refoams_7833.jpg
Views: 1381
Size:  130.1 KB
    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  12. #12
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,754
    Quote Originally Posted by script56 View Post
    BMWCCA sounds right about stiff surrounds.
    But I'd like to hear back from the original poster with results of a battery phase/polarity test. That's an easy first step that might be taken for granted (by me).
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  13. #13
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    they sounded good, then ...

    they left the house for refoaming. no other changes. so ......

    if they move in & out freely , then would look at speaker wire
    connections to the amp, then connections to the binding posts, then internally
    from the xover to the driver.

    eliminate the obvious before going major ....
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Poor Mans L250
    By mbottz in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-24-2005, 09:52 AM
  2. S-1 system Crossover... LX-10 - POOR ! ?
    By LE15-Thumper in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2004, 05:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •