Results 1 to 15 of 50

Thread: Array 1400 Using Stock SAM1HF, LE14H-3, and passive 2-way Crossover?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member reconed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    La Porte, IN
    Posts
    72

    Array 1400 Using Stock SAM1HF, LE14H-3, and passive 2-way Crossover?

    I have started an Array 1400 clone project. I have a pair of SAM1HFs and LE14H-3s, and I would consider making something like the SAM12x passive crossover but for use with LE14H-3. That may be good enough (for me) along with the stock SAM1HF crossovers. And less expensive and quicker to get up and running.

    Has anybody tried using the SAM1HF with its stock passive crossover with a modified SAM12X or home made SAM12X-type crossover for use with LE14H-3's for the woofers?

    I have collected a lot of info about the array 1400 clone projects here. I have found the schematics for the array 1400 crossovers. I was thinking of making the array 1400 low frequency crossover and adding a high-pass to feed the SAM1HF. Would this be worthwhile?

    Anyone have schematics for the SAM12X crossover?

    Another quick and dirty approach would be to use an active crossover and bi-amp. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    The goal is to make a high quality speaker for 2-channel audio.

  2. #2
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    With the SAM1HF and a LE14H-3 you are so close to having a magnificent speaker, to go "quick and dirty" with the networks would be so wrong! The difference a network makes isn't trivial, it is critical!


    Widget

  3. #3
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Just build stock 1400 networks or charge couple them for the 435 and 045. To bi-amp you need custom voltage drives that Greg Timbers has already been kind enough to provide. I built my 1400 Array's from scratch using Be components. Best thing to do is use the stock network with that component set. Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  4. #4
    Member reconed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    La Porte, IN
    Posts
    72

    Air core inductors worth it?

    I guess there are really no shortcuts, and I don't want to compromise the performance.

    I think this is the correct schematic for the stock Array 1400 crossovers.
    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...643-1400-Array (post #10)

    I've been putting together a parts list and finding the components.

    I saw a picture of the Array 1400 LF crossover which uses air-core inductors. In pictures of your (Robh3606) crossover I noticed some ferrite core inductors. How important is the core type for the large inductors in these crossovers? Is low DCR more important? The 14 gauge air core inductors available have a DCR of about 0.52 ohms, and the schematic shows a DCR of 0.45 ohms, is the difference significant enough to go to 13 gauge wire inductors or switch to ferrite core inductors with lower DCR?

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Just build stock 1400 networks or charge couple them for the 435 and 045. To bi-amp you need custom voltage drives that Greg Timbers has already been kind enough to provide. I built my 1400 Array's from scratch using Be components. Best thing to do is use the stock network with that component set. Rob

  5. #5
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    I saw a picture of the Array 1400 LF crossover which uses air-core inductors. In pictures of your (Robh3606) crossover I noticed some ferrite core inductors. How important is the core type for the large inductors in these crossovers? Is low DCR more important? The 14 gauge air core inductors available have a DCR of about 0.52 ohms, and the schematic shows a DCR of 0.45 ohms, is the difference significant enough to go to 13 gauge wire inductors or switch to ferrite core inductors with lower DCR?
    I went looking for air cores at the time and they were expensive. I have used ferrite and not had any issues. I mean how much power are you planning on using as far as listening levels?? I would definitely try to stay below the max DCR numbers. Do you have any crossover design software?? You can always see what effects changes in DCR will have. If it's only 10 mohms I would get to concerned. I got ERSE laminated I cores


    http://www.erseaudio.com/ELC54-18-4300


    Look at the difference in price also look at the power ratings

    http://www.erseaudio.com/Products/XQ.../EAV77-14-4500

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  6. #6
    Senior Member JuniorJBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,723
    I tried the XO's from my SAM1HF's but that only lasted about 20 minutes. I then used an Ashly 1001 and a pair of amps while I ordered crossover parts to build a passive crossover.

    I did Air cores on the MF and HF and ferrite on the 14.


    Truly that XO from the stock SAM's are more tuned towards speech and impact not music.

    JMO
    Always fun learning more.......

  7. #7
    Member reconed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    La Porte, IN
    Posts
    72

    Inductors

    Thanks Rob - I appreciate your advice on this. I'm sure the power handling would be fine either way. I don't want to add any audible distortion if it results from the ferrite core saturation or hysteresis. I have no experience to judge whether that would be audible. The 14 ga air core inductors are expensive and still have higher DCR. I think it really takes 13 ga wire to meet the DCR spec. The data sheet for the I cores states <8000 hz woofer applications.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    I went looking for air cores at the time and they were expensive. I have used ferrite and not had any issues. I mean how much power are you planning on using as far as listening levels?? I would definitely try to stay below the max DCR numbers. Do you have any crossover design software?? You can always see what effects changes in DCR will have. If it's only 10 mohms I would get to concerned. I got ERSE laminated I cores



    http://www.erseaudio.com/ELC54-18-4300


    Look at the difference in price also look at the power ratings

    http://www.erseaudio.com/Products/XQ.../EAV77-14-4500

    Rob

  8. #8
    Member reconed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    La Porte, IN
    Posts
    72

    ERSE Super Q

    Rob - I think these coils could do the trick, 600W.
    http://www.erseaudio.com/Products/Su.../ESQ55-14-4300

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    I went looking for air cores at the time and they were expensive. I have used ferrite and not had any issues. I mean how much power are you planning on using as far as listening levels?? I would definitely try to stay below the max DCR numbers. Do you have any crossover design software?? You can always see what effects changes in DCR will have. If it's only 10 mohms I would get to concerned. I got ERSE laminated I cores


    http://www.erseaudio.com/ELC54-18-4300


    Look at the difference in price also look at the power ratings

    http://www.erseaudio.com/Products/XQ.../EAV77-14-4500

    Rob

  9. #9
    Member reconed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    La Porte, IN
    Posts
    72

    Which Schematic Is Correct for the Stock Array 1400 Network?

    Quote Originally Posted by reconed View Post
    I guess there are really no shortcuts, and I don't want to compromise the performance.

    I think this is the correct schematic for the stock Array 1400 crossovers.
    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...643-1400-Array (post #10)

    I've been putting together a parts list and finding the components.

    I saw a picture of the Array 1400 LF crossover which uses air-core inductors. In pictures of your (Robh3606) crossover I noticed some ferrite core inductors. How important is the core type for the large inductors in these crossovers? Is low DCR more important? The 14 gauge air core inductors available have a DCR of about 0.52 ohms, and the schematic shows a DCR of 0.45 ohms, is the difference significant enough to go to 13 gauge wire inductors or switch to ferrite core inductors with lower DCR?
    The schematic in the link above shows a C1 = 56uF, but the schematic in the pdf file "Technical Manual1400 Array Project Array™ Series" show C1 = 47uF. Which is correct, why is there a difference?

  10. #10
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by reconed View Post
    The schematic in the link above shows a C1 = 56uF, but the schematic in the pdf file "Technical Manual1400 Array Project Array™ Series" show C1 = 47uF. Which is correct, why is there a difference?
    The EDS is stamped 04/05 while the Technical Manual is stamped 11/06. I'd go with the revision.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    Great job, well done.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Woody Banks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    676
    Very nicely done.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How connect a electronic crossover to JBL Array 1400?
    By jalejos in forum Electronic Crossovers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-06-2013, 08:55 AM
  2. 1400 Array / SAM1HF Horns
    By 4313B in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-14-2011, 12:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •