Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: The death of the home stereo system

  1. #1
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054

    The death of the home stereo system

    .
    http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/27/tech/i...stereo-system/

    snippet:

    "What's happened in the marketplace, the midmarket for audio has completely been obliterated," he says. "You have this high-end market that's getting smaller all the time, and then you've got the convenience market, which has taken over -- the MP3s, the Bluetooth devices, playing on laptops."

    He wishes more people knew what they were missing. At its best, he says, audio reproduction has "a religious aspect."

    "There's a primacy to audio," he says. "It's a form of magic."

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/27/tech/i...stereo-system/


    Glad that my son has a heavy ass stereo system that can still make magic



    (in addition to his pod & laptop) ............... and me too.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  2. #2
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    The home 2 channel stereo has morphed into the home HT system.

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  3. #3
    Maron Horonzakz
    Guest
    SCALE MODEL TRAINS,,2 channel STEREO,,RC planes..all fallin by the wayside,,

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    The home 2 channel stereo has morphed into the home HT system.

    Rob
    That's because 2-channel is to HT like B&W is to Color. Yeah, we can all appreciate a lovely B&W and it does things Color just flat out can't, and never will, do. But Color makes the world go round.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Chris Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    165
    I'm 10 months shy of my 30th birthday and my home Stereo is anything but dead

  6. #6
    Senior Member maxwedge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Concord, Ca USA
    Posts
    568
    I think recording studios, and I suspect many do, should be recording music for surround sound or at least for 3 sound points up front, but then of course panning will get you a center sound out of 2 speakers so that's a moot point. So now they can raise the price for surround sound cds!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    309
    [QUOTE=SEAWOLF97;353215].


    snippet:

    -- the MP3s, the Bluetooth devices, playing on laptops.


    Glad that my son has a heavy ass stereo system that can still make magic

    actually MP3s are "old world"..streaming is the new word.....most of my Napster stuff
    was zapped by "on line" erase commands" from the big boys
    Last edited by Fort Knox; 09-30-2013 at 07:56 AM. Reason: sp.

  8. #8
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Fort Knox View Post
    actually MP3s are "old world"..streaming is the new word.....most of my Napster stuff
    was zapped by "on line" erase commands" from the big boys
    I've been in IT since '75 and have seen a lot. This is the first time that I've ever read or heard of "zapped by "on line" erase commands" from the big boys" . doesn't mean it can't happen , but ...

    Being in the field so long, I have a huge distrust for most anything digital or mechanical.

    Streaming ? a joke to me. Heck, most of the cell phone call I get , suck badly. my PC isn't even wireless and streaming video news (the latest and greatest for local TV stations) suck too. Maybe in the future when all copper is pulled , streaming will work like promised , but not today.

    Digital ? Almost everything digital is stored on hard drives. Turn one upside down and among the electrical ratings you will find a "MTBF" number. Well what is that ???

    Mean Time Between Failures. ie: the expected life of the drive or when it may fail. Not IF it will fail, but when its expected to. Crazy how many iPod hard drives croak and entire digital collections are lost. IT mantra = backup, backup, backup ...

    Sure, LP's wear out. Tape degrades, CD's may too. But streaming? I'll save the bandwidth for you to use.
    (oh heck, I do stream Pandora sometimes. It sucks too.)


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_time_between_failures
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    I've been in IT since '75 and have seen a lot. This is the first time that I've ever read or heard of "zapped by "on line" erase commands" from the big boys" . doesn't mean it can't happen , but ...

    Being in the field so long, I have a huge distrust for most anything digital or mechanical.

    Streaming ? a joke to me. Heck, most of the cell phone call I get , suck badly. my PC isn't even wireless and streaming video news (the latest and greatest for local TV stations) suck too. Maybe in the future when all copper is pulled , streaming will work like promised , but not today.

    Digital ? Almost everything digital is stored on hard drives. Turn one upside down and among the electrical ratings you will find a "MTBF" number. Well what is that ???

    Mean Time Between Failures. ie: the expected life of the drive or when it may fail. Not IF it will fail, but when its expected to. Crazy how many iPod hard drives croak and entire digital collections are lost. IT mantra = backup, backup, backup ...

    Sure, LP's wear out. Tape degrades, CD's may too. But streaming? I'll save the bandwidth for you to use. (oh heck, I do stream Pandora sometimes. It sucks too.)


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_time_between_failures
    I bought a computer in the fall of 99 for the sole purpose of napster file sharing ...and playing 5-9k songs thru my main system....
    was pretty cool.....but as the copyright cry babies won their court cases the peer to peer system was reprogramed to delete select
    files video and audio ...vanished overnight off your machines ..in large numbers..and not to be recovered either
    I lost all but a couple videos

  10. #10
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Fort Knox View Post
    I bought a computer in the fall of 99 for the sole purpose of napster file sharing ...and playing 5-9k songs thru my main system....
    was pretty cool.....but as the copyright cry babies won their court cases the peer to peer system was reprogramed to delete select
    files video and audio ...vanished overnight off your machines ..in large numbers..and not to be recovered either
    I lost all but a couple videos

    OK, I'm not going to doubt you , but if true ... I'd sure configure the router better, set up a firewall , backup files , activate an AntiVirus system. etc.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  11. #11
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    That's because 2-channel is to HT like B&W is to Color. Yeah, we can all appreciate a lovely B&W and it does things Color just flat out can't, and never will, do. But Color makes the world go round.
    I read most of your posts as most are "right on" , but do disagree on the B&W vs Color and 2 channel to HT analogy. Esp. the "But Color makes the world go round" statement.

    I started in photography in B&W and did it for a long time and loved it. It takes skill to use the 255 shades of gray to advantage. Generally it makes much more dramatic pix and forces the viewer to delve deeper and use some imagination , just as 2 channel can do. Any moron with a camera phone can shoot color and declare themselves photographers. No skill needed. Color has come to the masses but they really don't know what to do with it.

    Compounding the whole mess is Photoshop on computers ... you can now make color pictures that can't exist in reality. They are cool and striking, but certainly don't make my world go round.

    Most audio centric people that I know regard HT music as a gimmick and for serious listening use 2 channel only.

    When mono was morphing into stereo, there were lots of "ping pong" special effects records to show off the new 2 channel. It was just as bad when Quad came in and HT seems to follow the trend. That doesn't make it real , or good.

    HT doesn't "make the world go round" either , at least not for me, not yet.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  12. #12
    Senior Member honkytonkwillie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, but North-er and West-er
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    That's because 2-channel is to HT like B&W is to Color. Yeah, we can all appreciate a lovely B&W and it does things Color just flat out can't, and never will, do. But Color makes the world go round.
    I don't think the analogy fits well beyond the superifcial recognition that 2-channel and HT are very different things for very different purposes. I also think many people mistakenly believe 2-channel evolved into multichannel/HT which is completely not the case.

    HT evolved on it's own, alongside each new format to put pictures on the screen. What began as a single little paper cone next to the 10" B+W CRT, became stereo outputs on the TV and VCR to play through the (existing) stereo system; to all the variants of multichannel that come with DVD, Blu-Ray and HDTV today. Whatever notion of 2-channel and HT being part of the same continuum stems from the (rather brief) overlap in the second step above, where audio gear was also used for HT.

    Starting at least as far back as Quad, recorded music could have widely adopted any of the multichannel formats along the way. In the Darwinian sense, for music, multichannel has yet to demonstrate better fitness and outcompete 2-channel.

    Far be it from dead, I often wonder just how it will evolve
    I control the treble.
    I control the bass.

  13. #13
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Ok. I had just finished listening to Roxy Music's Avalon SACD when I posted.

    I am not going to back off the two-channel versus multi-channel statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    Most audio centric people that I know regard HT music as a gimmick and for serious listening use 2 channel only.
    I'm aware of that. I used to get serious and listen to music too. Now it's just plain fun. I like the total immersion thing and usually watch a movie when I have time rather than just listen to music. Maybe it is a gimmick. Time will tell. With buying power dropping though I think people would rather put the money into a decent multi-channel than settle for just two-channel. The HT rig will just have to do double duty as a two-channel source if two-channel is desired.

    Two-channel is still the most popular; Ear buds, iPhones and iPods are everywhere. Do they even make a multi-channel docking station? I haven't looked.

  14. #14
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    With buying power dropping though I think people would rather put the money into a decent multi-channel than settle for just two-channel.

    The HT rig will just have to do double duty as a two-channel source if two-channel is desired.
    completely agree , except out here in Appalachia West most don't get a decent multichannel, they get those "HT in a box" all-in-one evil Bose copy thingies from WallyMart and think they're in Heaven.

    I don't have room for big speakers for HT and for 2 channel in the same room, so the rears and center are wired directly to the AVR, but the mains go to a switch box that also takes the mains output from the stereo gear ....so either system can share the one pair of large speakers ... the big a/d/s 's are doing the double duty.

    And yes, I shoot mostly in color .. sometimes you have to follow conventions whether you want to or not.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    97

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Fort Knox View Post
    I bought a computer in the fall of 99 for the sole purpose of napster file sharing ...and playing 5-9k songs thru my main system....
    was pretty cool.....but as the copyright cry babies won their court cases the peer to peer system was reprogramed to delete select
    files video and audio ...vanished overnight off your machines ..in large numbers..and not to be recovered either
    I lost all but a couple videos
    You're not wearing your tin foil hat right.

    I downloaded a hundred or more mp3's from Napster, still have them all. Don't play them, they do not sound good. There is an entire generation who must think all music sounds bad, listening to their iPods with Dr Dre ear buds. No wonder they don't buy music, all the "music" they hear has been processed to death. I would not like cheese either if the only cheese I could get was processed American cheese food.

    As far as photography goes, I have yet to see a B&W digital camera.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Can a home stereo pre-amp drive a sound reinforcement amp such as Crown 802?
    By robertbartsch in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-16-2012, 08:47 AM
  2. 4311B based American vintage stereo system
    By Bern1 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-13-2011, 05:02 PM
  3. My new home system
    By soundmanshorty in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-19-2008, 03:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •