I'm thinking about replacing the 2421B's (JBL Al diaphragm's with diamond surrounds) in my 4343 to the newer 2425J driver, is it a drop in replacement or does it require modifying the crossover?
Also, what is the difference between 2425J and 2426J?
I'm thinking about replacing the 2421B's (JBL Al diaphragm's with diamond surrounds) in my 4343 to the newer 2425J driver, is it a drop in replacement or does it require modifying the crossover?
Also, what is the difference between 2425J and 2426J?
Why?? No crossover mod required. The 2425 has a solid throat while the 2426 has a screw on adaptor that when removed allows you to use threaded horns like a 2342. For your application you could use either one. Just make sure the 2426's have the adaptors. Rob
"I could be arguing in my spare time"
Thank you for your reply Rob!
I thought the 2425/2426 would be an improvement over the old 2421?
You might want to hang on to the 2421's, in case (after a good long listening span)
you decide that the Titanium is not actually an improvement in sound -quality-.
Ti diaphragms have more objectionable distortion characteristics than the aluminum diaphragms. They are an improvement in durability and that is why JBL moved towards Ti, especially in pro applications.
These comments are assuming both drivers/diaphragms are operating within specs.
Widget
That's true, my concern is that titanium diaphragms may sound too harsh...
BTW, the 4344 and 4345 also came out with 2425J installed - did they have Ti diaphragms or still aluminium ones equipped?
Actually that was my first idea - to buy a pair of broken 2425J's and put my aluminium diaphragms in.
How can I spot the difference between alu and Ti dia's since they both seem to have a smooth surface and diamond-style suspension?
Hi,
I am not sure, but aluminum diaphragm (that is acceptable durability) D16R2420 that has 'tangential aluminum suspension'
(looking like; http://reconingspeakers.com/product/...421-diaphragm/ )
while D16R2425 is titanium 'diamond shape suspension'
(looking like: http://reconingspeakers.com/product/...425-diaphragm/ )
Not to mention that the color of aluminum is "less dark" then titanium.
Concerning the price may be "Radian 1225" aluminum diaphragm with 'Mylar' (looking like polyester) suspension be acceptable solution.
(looking like: http://www.parts-express.com/pe/show...number=294-720 )
Regards
Ivica
Afaik, the D16R2421 was also available with diamond surrounds like these:
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...1&d=1153844854
The diaphragms have now:
Front - http://tinypic.com/r/2vjx8d4/5
Back - http://tinypic.com/r/2mrzeki/5
The LE85/2420/2421 with aluminum diaphragm is a very desirable compression driver.
And plenty of people have put the D8R2421 or D16R2421 aluminum diaphragm into a ferrite 2425/2426 core.
Conversely, plenty of people have put the D8R2425 or D16R2425 titanium diaphragm into the LE85/2420/2421 alnico core.
What these cores really need though is an Mg or Be diaphragm. It's 2013 and it's well past time.
We will have to see what JBL does with the smaller diameter D2-type compression drivers. They could potentially marginalize everything else on the market providing they are priced right.
I guess there always will be two camps - Alnico vs ferrite
My 2421B's look mint but I was thinking about 'upgrading' to 2425/2426 core because of stronger magnets.
p.s
Are mine diaphragms actually genuine D16R2421's?
They are marked but the connectors are covered with goo from detoriating foam damping.
Can I buy the new damping pads somewhere?
Interesting, but no JBL numbers at the bottom side, as I would expect....http://reconingspeakers.com/product/...425-diaphragm/
Regards
Ivica
The one from reconingspeakers look strange, they seem to have a copper inlay on the inside?
Mine have some text wrtten by hand on the inside of the voice coil, it's written with a pencil or a grey marker (?)
The surface texture appears to be aluminum (vs Ti) at least.
They look pretty convincing for older 2421 type JBL dias.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)