Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Not sure if 21184-2 cones are authentic

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    6

    Not sure if 21184-2 cones are authentic

    Let me know if I am posting this in the wrong place.

    Hey guys,
    Like the title says if someone can give me a little help on figuring out if these Altec 21184-2 cones I came across are the real McCoy. They also have another code stamped on them on the other side of the back of the cone - MW24853-01 and below that is a (character I can't read)2 74.

    The guys I asked on another stereo site I am part of thought they were bogus like I think they are.

    Do these sound like they would be the real deal or did I get hustled?

    http://vintagespeaker.net/altec-604e...-pairvintarare

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    6
    I received a response from the seller and that says, "those cones are org they have addition house numbers on them that were added by a distributor,that doesnt make them non oem,,,,,however if you are un happy,just mail back and ill send full refund,sorry you were not pleased"

    I am not buying it, what does the peanut gallery think?
    The 21184-2 stamps don't look like Altec font to me at all.

    Huh, just found the MW24853 code on a set of aftermarket recones at The Speaker Exchange. Plot gets thicker.
    http://reconingspeakers.com/product/...t/#prettyPhoto

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    The first thread on this subject is over here ! )

    Simply send the cones back ( for the refund the seller has already offered you ) if you don't have confidence that your purchase can be worked into your repair ( whatever that is ) .

    I have to assume that you're keeping your woofers current coils & spiders ( since you only bought some cones / which is just a single component of a full recone kit ) .

    ( Btw; many of the cones & coils that GPA currently uses are also not the same as original Altec spec / ( for example ) their ( modern version of the ) 416-8b has some important differences in the TS numbers ( when compared to Altec's official publications )

    Compare ;

    GPA 416-8B vs Altec 416-8B


  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    6
    I posted over here also because usually when I have specific Altec questions people usually point me to here for expert advice on things Altec.
    I see on the auction website people listing authentic cones every now and then and figured if I could get them at a decent price I would try and get them.
    He did offer a full refund and return but what I wanted was a set of authentic cones that I could use if I needed to recone my 515B of 416-8B woofers that I would probably have Bill do.
    The other codes on the cones just don't give me confidence that they are authentic NOS Altec cones and I just wanted to see what others thought on the subject. I am not trying to bash anyone but just obtain a little knowledge from others in the know.

    Thanks for any help on this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Are these authentic JBL cones?
    By mtchyz250f in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-05-2014, 02:37 PM
  2. Are these authentic JBL cones?
    By mtchyz250f in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-12-2008, 11:12 AM
  3. How to tell 2425h diaphragm is authentic.
    By crtstudios76 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-11-2007, 01:30 PM
  4. Looking for Authentic MA 15's anyone have a set of 4??
    By lgvenable in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-14-2007, 09:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •