Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Modifying the M552 / M553

  1. #1
    Senior Member frank23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    356

    Modifying the M552 / M553

    My setup has evolved to such a level that the M553 I use as a crossover has by far become the weakest link in the setup. Therefore I decided to examine the circuit, do measurements and see what mods could be made to improve the soundquality. One could say that there are a great number of other active crossovers available, but none of those had what I was looking for out of the box like the M553 has. As the M552 circuit is exactly the same save for the 2-way vs 3-way, the below also goes for the M552.

    In the circuit are about 32 capacitors in the signal route. As in high end systems the sound of even one capacitor is deemed critical to the overall system sound, you can image what 32 can do to the sound. But if all these had a function, upgrading them would be quite a lot of work and cost quite some euro's, although the time involved would be much more of a burden for me.

    So I analysed the circuit and made measurements with multimeter and scope to see what happened after each opamp. It turned out the DC was quite low at all points in the circuit. Capacitors are normally used to prevent potentiometers from crackling by blocking the DC. But here the DC is only in the area of 40mV max. This could still be a problem if the amplification was large, but in all the steps in the M553 process, there is about unity gain with all pots set at 0dB. So the ratio between DC and signal was always about the same.

    Therefore I thought it would have to be possible to bridge 26 out of the 32 capacitors. Incredible, 26 out of 32 could go. And I just did it by bridging all the 26 pairs of legs by small soldered jumper leads of about 5mm. And the M553 now sounds awesome. Depth, air, body, mellow, lucid, name it. It can finally keep up with the rest of my system.

    So, why did JBL include all those capacitors in the first place? I think for predictability in how the M553 would function. With the capacitors it is more foolproof, less of a worry I guess, as the potmeters can't crackle, there is no plop when muting etc. But in reality, in my living room, the 26 could go.

    6 remain as they are the output capacitors and are the final block for DC leaving the M553 (both hot and cold of the balanced outputs have one each).

    So, if you use the M553 in a high end setup (or any home setup I'd say), bridge the 26 caps and free your sound!

    ps., and see to it that the subsonic filter is bypassed by setting the jumpers the right way...

  2. #2
    Senior Member just4kinks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    223
    Can you be specific about which of the capacitors you removed?

    I have glanced at the schematics and I don't see any unnecessary capacitors. I hope you're not talking about the filters.

    I would suggest buying some 1% polypropylene film caps, like the MKP1837. And if you don't adjust the frequency often, you could replace the pots with fixed 1% metal film resistors.

  3. #3
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,548
    Wow and wow! Very cool discussion ... thanks for sharing this info!

    6 remain as they are the output capacitors and are the final block for DC leaving the M553
    (both hot and cold of the balanced outputs have one each)
    JBL 553 Specs & Schematic

    Quote Originally Posted by frank23 View Post
    My setup has evolved to such a level that the M553 I use as a crossover has by far become the weakest link in the setup. Therefore I decided to examine the circuit, do measurements and see what mods could be made to improve the soundquality. One could say that there are a great number of other active crossovers available, but none of those had what I was looking for out of the box like the M553 has. As the M552 circuit is exactly the same save for the 2-way vs 3-way, the below also goes for the M552.

    In the circuit are about 32 capacitors in the signal route. As in high end systems the sound of even one capacitor is deemed critical to the overall system sound, you can image what 32 can do to the sound. But if all these had a function, upgrading them would be quite a lot of work and cost quite some euro's, although the time involved would be much more of a burden for me.

    So I analyzed the circuit and made measurements with multimeter and scope to see what happened after each opamp. It turned out the DC was quite low at all points in the circuit. Capacitors are normally used to prevent potentiometers from crackling by blocking the DC. But here the DC is only in the area of 40mV max. This could still be a problem if the amplification was large, but in all the steps in the M553 process, there is about unity gain with all pots set at 0dB. So the ratio between DC and signal was always about the same.

    Therefore I thought it would have to be possible to bridge 26 out of the 32 capacitors. Incredible, 26 out of 32 could go. And I just did it by bridging all the 26 pairs of legs by small soldered jumper leads of about 5mm. And the M553 now sounds awesome. Depth, air, body, mellow, lucid, name it. It can finally keep up with the rest of my system.

    So, why did JBL include all those capacitors in the first place? I think for predictability in how the M553 would function. With the capacitors it is more foolproof, less of a worry I guess, as the potimeters can't crackle, there is no plop when muting etc. But in reality, in my living room, the 26 could go.

    6 remain as they are the output capacitors and are the final block for DC leaving the M553 (both hot and cold of the balanced outputs have one each).

    So, if you use the M553 in a high end setup (or any home setup I'd say), bridge the 26 caps and free your sound!

    ps., and see to it that the subsonic filter is bypassed by setting the jumpers the right way...
    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  4. #4
    Senior Member jblbgw_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    133

    DC Bias

    I concur with just4kinks … most of the “coupling” caps are forming part of the filter sections ….. if you have removed them it might be worth doing a frequency sweep to see what you have ended up with, sounds like you could be surprised or disappointed … Traditionally in Opamps, coupling caps are used to reduce the effects of DC Bias offsets on the front end of the Opamps from the preceding Opamp stage, the voltages are just a few mV or lower and will vary greatly with temperature. Now imagine a series of cascaded Opamps one after the other all with a DC Offset, the first Opamp multiply it’s DC Offset by its gain and then follow through on all the Opamps multiplying by their gain … by the end you could quite easily end up with offsets of some many volts in either polarity … all subject to temperature drift, now superimpose an AC waveform on that DC Bias of say 10 volts …. Then this is going to reduce the overall AC level you can use (by the DC Bias level) as you approach the supply rail voltages and all unstable and temperature dependent and it goes without saying this will also severely reduce your headroom as well …. Capacitors are NEVER used for “to prevent potentiometers from crackling by blocking the DC” … if you want to stick with the M552 and improve the sound then replace C9, 91, 97, 98, 40 and 41 with Elna Cerafine caps or some other audio grade cap …. These will be the main culprits and if you want to continue then replace all the signal caps with polypropylene film caps or so …. And contemplate doing a Opamp upgrade ….. personally I would be removing all those wire links you have soldered in and your speakers might appreciate it as well! .. good luck !!
    4435, 4430, 4315, 4312B.
    2 x Bryston 4BSST2, BGW 203, JBL 5235, Aphex 720.

  5. #5
    Senior Member frank23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    356
    1) of course I did not remove the caps that form the filter section
    2) the coupling caps I bridged are not part of the filter section
    3) I checked that all gain stages, from output of the previous to the output of the next, are all unity gain, so no large buildup of DC will take place, otherwise that would indeed have been a problem
    4) I didn't know DC was temperature dependent, I'll check it once it has been warmed up

    I'll post the numbers I bridged tonight, but they are the caps around the pots and mute buttons, and some between sections.

    try it!

  6. #6
    RE: Member when? subwoof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    fingerlakes region, NY
    Posts
    1,899

    offset

    a few things:

    Remember that DC offsets can go either polarity / amount and if many are in series, may just cancel out the overall amount.

    Also by changing the type of op amp to a non-compensated version, and adding a trim pot, you can bring the offset to essentially zero. this is standard form for small signal amplification in labs.

    And the outputs can also be changed to true diff output chips that do not use series caps and have great CMMR - rane uses these and many console manufacturers.



    And I happen to have a pair of the 553's in the "stash" ....maybe worth looking into for the big house speaker system. wasn't too keen on going digital..

    sub

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    Book about active crossovers

    See the 4th book on this page: http://www.douglas-self.com/ampins/ampins.htm

    Ruediger

  8. #8
    Senior Member frank23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    356
    Ok, the caps I bridged are: C19, C96, C28 (I think, can't quite decipher the PDF, 15uF NP before the first NE5534), C21, C39, C97, C98, C42, C101, C102, C45, C104, C105

    This is for channel 1, the equivalent caps for channel 2 are also bridged, making 26 in total.

    I have left on the modded M553 overnight and it still works fine. I did notice that the nuts that fasten the potentiometers to the front have to be fastened as otherwise when touching some of them a slight hum was noticable. I left them of yesterday and left the nuts and knobs off, but when firing up the system I noticed a slight hum when touching the shafts so I put the nuts on again and fastened them and that made it silent again.

    The change in sound quality is still amazing. Whole new worlds open as the rest of my system was so much better, the M553 can now keep up again. And yes, I could have exchanged all the caps, but the best cap is still no cap in my experience. Now I still need a few black gates in the power supply and in the output.

  9. #9
    Senior Member frank23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    356
    Just wanted to let you know the M553 stil plays without fault, so now I'm sure all is well. And the sound quality benefit is very large indeed. It made me sell me sell my beloved high-end cd player as suddenly it was clear another combination I had was much more open, and the M553 finally had the quality to show it. Before, it levelled all outputs to the same mediocre quality, now differences are clearly audible.

  10. #10
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruediger View Post
    See the 4th book on this page: http://www.douglas-self.com/ampins/ampins.htm

    Ruediger
    Publication Date: June 24, 2011

    I missed that one, thanks for the heads up! My copy shows up this Friday.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Hi Frank

    Thank you for bringing this up.
    Certainly DC-coupling of hifi equipment brings dramatic improvements in sound. The reason you don't find this in commercial equipment is because it is dangerous if you don't know exactly what you do. I've seen you do but one need to have some electronic skills to run a fully DC coupled chain. That's why commercial amps/preamps go the safe route and block DC at inputs and outputs of gain stages.

    I run a Pass X2.5 type DIY preamp based on the UGS 4 design without any caps. The improvement when removing the caps was almost shocking! BUT the DC-Offset must be carefully controlled.

    Next step is to remove output caps from the DAC which can be problematic as it is not so DC stable as the X2.5

    To remove the input caps from the Mono Amps (XA100.5) is only for FAB (Fearless Amplifier Builders) With a Gain of 26dB even a small DC offset can cause serious destruction.

  12. #12
    Senior Member frank23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido View Post
    To remove the input caps from the Mono Amps (XA100.5) is only for FAB (Fearless Amplifier Builders) With a Gain of 26dB even a small DC offset can cause serious destruction.
    And as I run my 2420 without any blocking cap between amp and drivers, this would not work for me :-)

    I need amps that are reliable and have low DC offset. I use the very nice Marantz MA24 monoblocks designed by Ken Ishiwata. I have 6 of them, 3 for each channel l/m/h. They have a built in DC offset monitoring thingie.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. modifying the 3120A ?
    By vag365 in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 07:28 AM
  2. M553 need help
    By macaroonie in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-09-2007, 10:02 AM
  3. M553 x/over help
    By macaroonie in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-19-2006, 10:02 AM
  4. Use of M553 (3-way crossover) as 2-way?
    By GarMan in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-18-2005, 05:49 AM
  5. Who can tell me more about the M552/M553?
    By David Dryden in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-01-2004, 05:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •