Originally Posted by M1k@el
Yes ( here's one ) !
- Those two caps are perfectly setup to "DC bias" .
- ( IME ) the presence of DC within a cap can help reduce ( and sometimes, even eliminate ) inexplicable sources of "newly-found" sibilance .
- An explanation of sorts ; a cap holding a charge of DC voltage becomes much less "self-resonant" when it's asked to pass AC signals.
- These " high-Q resonances" are heard when they get triggered by the appropriate ( frequency dependent ) signal .
- This ( statement, if accepted ) can help explain the ( not-so-often ) reported phenomena of an observed, "capacitor break-in period" .
- This also assumes that one will accept the statement that subjecting a cap to a significant AC load, will have the net effect of the capacitor acquiring a residual polarization ( ie; some DC offset where the cap never fully returns to "zero" / which is a "memory effect" of sorts / and you can blame gravity if you must "blame" something for this "asymmetrical" behavior in real world circuits ) .
- To implement; ( with the speaker un-plugged from the driving amplifier and the tweeter disconnected from those 2 caps ) add 1.5 volts dc ( obtained from a AA battery ) to the central junction of the 2.2 caps by applying the "+" voltage to the junction of the two caps ( the "-" side of the battery is connected to the minus side of the crossover network ) .
- Remove battery ( after 24 hours ) and allow the 2 caps to continue holding/storing the dc charge .
- Reconnect the speakers, as well as the network and get back to listening .
- If this seems like too much voodoo for you to accept / well, simply ignore this post ( keeping in mind that it also took quite a while to prove the world wasn't flat ) .
cheers
BTW; I (obviously) disagree with that part of Ruediger's assessment that there's nothing to be done .