why does JBL 4365 only rank 10th in Japanese eyes?

[martin_wu99]

because it is too cheap?
Let's talk about hi-end speakers

[martin_wu99]

only 5 pics per time

[martin_wu99]

the last pic

[hjames]

because it is too cheap?
Let's talk about hi-end speakers

because it is NOT available Stateside?

For that factor alone very few of us can tell how it is voiced, for instance,
we any don't have familiarity to make any further comments.

Maybe it doesn't have the usual big monitor panache BECAUSE
it is not real US Studio Monitor like 4343/45s-
it just plays one in the brochures?

[martin_wu99]

because it is NOT available Stateside?

For that factor alone very few of us can tell how it is voiced, for instance,
we any don't have familiarity to make any further comments.

Maybe it doesn't have the usual big monitor panache BECAUSE it is not real US Studio Monitor like 4343/45s-
it just plays one in the brochures?

what a pity!
why so many good JBLs are not in the US?

[4313B]

why so many good JBLs are not in the US?

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but we do have most of the "good" JBL's.

[Valentin]

Its a very nice system

And a very good price point Just look at the other speakers


Could you post the tech papers now that stereo sound has published

[SEAWOLF97]

all the top 9 are AT LEAST double the price of the JBL's (at #10) and
many below it are too.

(#10 in s.e.Asia is a lucky number , I was called #10 all the time )

[martin_wu99]

Its a very nice system

And a very good price point Just look at the other speakers


Could you post the tech papers now that stereo sound has published

The price of 4365 is 65k RMB in China on webshop.
Stereo sound didn't have tech papers on it
but i have

[martin_wu99]

Its a very nice system

And a very good price point Just look at the other speakers


Could you post the tech papers now that stereo sound has published

More info

[martin_wu99]

Noticing that 4365 has no battery on its crossover,i think it is a simplified charge-couple circuit.
4313B may recovery it

[JuniorJBL]

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but we do have most of the "good" JBL's.

I like my 1400's WAY more than my (just sold) B&W Signature 800's. That list comes from a reviewer who listens by price!!
At 12k for new 1400's they are quite a bargin compared to even the 25k 800 diamonds!

[JBLAddict]

I like my 1400's WAY more than my (just sold) B&W Signature 800's. That list comes from a reviewer who listens by price!!
At 12k for new 1400's they are quite a bargin compared to even the 25k 800 diamonds!

care to give a comparison between the 1400 and Sig800?

[Mr. Widget]

I like my 1400's WAY more than my (just sold) B&W Signature 800's. That list comes from a reviewer who listens by price!!
At 12k for new 1400's they are quite a bargin compared to even the 25k 800 diamonds!

I haven't heard the Signature 800s, but I have had the opportunity to AB the 800D and the 1400 Arrays in a double blind comparison. I could happily live with either speaker. I think they are both quite wonderful. Obviously at 1/2 the price, I think the JBL is the hands down winner, but interestingly in the blind listening session, it was actually difficult to consistently know which speaker was which. As much as we can in audio, I'd call it a tie.


Widget

[4313B]

for that factor alone very few of us can tell how it is voiced, for instance,
we any don't have familiarity to make any further comments.

The word is that we would prefer the S4700. I haven't looked to see what the prices are for either system.

Could you post the tech papers now that stereo sound has published

I'll try and remember to when I get back home next week.