Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Jbl 4430 and crown xls 1500

  1. #1
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154

    Jbl 4430 and crown xls 1500

    Hi,
    I was just wondering if one could bi amp 4430 with two crown XLS 1500 setting up the crossover at 1000 Hz, just having the speakers tuned to external crossover, and thus not having an active crossover ?
    Will the compression take the 300 W ? could it cope with the remaining of the passive crossover for it ? would the slope at 24 dB would do ?

    (please do not be too hard if I am talking totall b.....sh...)

    David

  2. #2
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    The 443x bi-amp curves (5234/5 cards) are buried here somewhere, so if the crown can emulate that, then sure
    just switch the speaker to bi-amp mode and set the amp gain levels.
    The 300w question is the silly one

  3. #3
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154
    Thanks,

    well, I was writing this concern about the power because the manual of the 4430 is saying: "recomanded power amplifier" in biamp 75 W for the compression and 200 W for the boomer.... and the 2425H manual is saying 70 W - 100 W....yes its "continuous program, and music is not, but still... I do not want to blow a 2425H in the process....

  4. #4
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Hallo!

    Just go for it!!

    You have limiters in those Crowns as long as you do a proper Gain Structure. Connect one amp to one speaker and use x-over settings at 1000Hz, you have to try out what sounds best here regarding slopes.

    One amp to one speaker, Channel 1 to Bass and Channel 2 to HF, or vice verca, look in the manual of the XLS1500.

    It's a great amp!!

  5. #5
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Hallo!

    I see in the manual of the XLS that you can connect the crossover system in four modes. Just choose!

  6. #6
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154
    The slope is fixed at 24dB LR....
    i need to find a way to completely bypass the remaining of the passive xover for the comptession ?
    Would this slope do ?

  7. #7
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    No. If the slope is fixed, you will need to rethink what you are attempting to do
    (you would be redesigning a speaker crossover and the required contouring EQ,
    as opposed to using it as intended).

    At this point, I would drop the biamp idea and just do the recommended series
    of modifications/updates for this speaker (bypass the biamp switch, replace or
    clean the L-pads, perhaps "charge-couple" the crossover, consider other diaphragms
    if Ti is in place...)

    Regarding power to the compression driver, 75W is sufficient (more is just unnecessary),
    but a 300W amp will not hurt it any more than a 75W amp that is in clipping... at which
    point you will be damaging your hearing anyway.

    I still have a pair of 4430s and enjoy them quite a bit

  8. #8
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154
    Oh ! I thought every analog crossover had a fixed 24 dB / o slope....

    And, when using digital crossover, often, people advise to start with a 24 dB slope and see from this on.... So it means I cannot even use a DBX 223XS
    which has, for being an analog crossover, a slope fixed at 24 dB.... it is said to replace the M 552 .... which itself could be used for bi amp the 4430....

    This crown 4430 thing comes from 1 that I want to avoid digital crossover (but this pretens is getting weaker every day) and 2 I wanted to do a sort of crown M2 system, because of the analogy between both speakers....
    The crown XLS have no sophisticated DSP but an analog crossover.... I was so happy with my idea....

  9. #9
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    if this doesn't help, then I stand by my reply:

    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...hlight=52-5130

    ... doesn't mean it can't be done, it just means you are playing in the deep end of the pool

  10. #10
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by davidpou View Post
    Oh ! I thought every analog crossover had a fixed 24 dB / o slope....

    And, when using digital crossover, often, people advise to start with a 24 dB slope and see from this on.... So it means I cannot even use a DBX 223XS
    which has, for being an analog crossover, a slope fixed at 24 dB.... it is said to replace the M 552 .... which itself could be used for bi amp the 4430....

    This crown 4430 thing comes from 1 that I want to avoid digital crossover (but this pretens is getting weaker every day) and 2 I wanted to do a sort of crown M2 system, because of the analogy between both speakers....
    The crown XLS have no sophisticated DSP but an analog crossover.... I was so happy with my idea....
    Hallo!

    My thought was that you would keep the passive x-over intakt in 4430. My recommendation seems not to be good if you are choosing XLS1500 amps without the x-over in the speakers. It is 12dB/oct slope in the 4430 at 1000Hz according to specs.

    Keep the 4430 as it is and use one XLS1500 and bi-wire them instead. More then enough power for them.

    If bi-amping without x-over in the speakers, use dbx260, here you have all the feature you'll need.

  11. #11
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154
    hi,
    I have also contradictory echoes from the JBL forum in France. An "authority" of the site, to my big suprise, advised me the same: keep the passive part and pug the crowns with the 1kHz crossover point respected... An other one, adivised numerical crossover like the one you said, or DCX 2496, they all do that it seems.

    I will have a look at the passive crossover upgrade (audiokarma thread, I think) as Grumpy said. I went to fast on that one....

    An old repair guy here told me the same: bi amp is lots of trouble for an uncertain result....

    BUT on the other hand every one gone bi amping is not wanting to come back to mono.... and there is that: http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm

    I think i will give it a go. I will just buy one crown and if it sounds bad I will find another use for it (Home cinema for instance). I will give it a try on one speaker running in mono (not stereo) and keep the passive part on the mid and high. I will let you know....

  12. #12
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by davidpou View Post
    hi,
    I have also contradictory echoes from the JBL forum in France. An "authority" of the site, to my big suprise, advised me the same: keep the passive part and pug the crowns with the 1kHz crossover point respected... An other one, adivised numerical crossover like the one you said, or DCX 2496, they all do that it seems.

    I will have a look at the passive crossover upgrade (audiokarma thread, I think) as Grumpy said. I went to fast on that one....

    An old repair guy here told me the same: bi amp is lots of trouble for an uncertain result....

    BUT on the other hand every one gone bi amping is not wanting to come back to mono.... and there is that: http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm

    I think i will give it a go. I will just buy one crown and if it sounds bad I will find another use for it (Home cinema for instance). I will give it a try on one speaker running in mono (not stereo) and keep the passive part on the mid and high. I will let you know....
    Hallo!

    You can test with stereo config as well. Just connect channel 2 in bi-wire and don't connect the channel 1. Turn the knob "off" for channel 1. Here you can compare with mono and stereo mode. But I think in mono mode for the 4430 is overkill, in bridge mode you will have 1050Watts of power in 8ohms. Way to much power...

  13. #13
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by Mctwins View Post
    Hallo!

    You can test with stereo config as well. Just connect channel 2 in bi-wire and don't connect the channel 1. Turn the knob "off" for channel 1. Here you can compare with mono and stereo mode. But I think in mono mode for the 4430 is overkill, in bridge mode you will have 1050Watts of power in 8ohms. Way to much power...
    No I have been misunderstood. The test is simply to put the preamp on mono so as to have the full audio message on one speaker (and not just the right voice) but the Crown would be run at 8 ohms so 2 times 215 W.

    I wanted to come back to your previous post: the best would be to connecte the HP directly onto the binding post and the filtering will be ONLY external, the passive filter can only induce bad response, and its contradictory with the biamp idea to keep passive components. Why did you say I had to keep the passive part for the high freq ?

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by davidpou View Post
    No I have been misunderstood. The test is simply to put the preamp on mono so as to have the full audio message on one speaker (and not just the right voice) but the Crown would be run at 8 ohms so 2 times 215 W.

    I wanted to come back to your previous post: the best would be to connecte the HP directly onto the binding post and the filtering will be ONLY external, the passive filter can only induce bad response, and its contradictory with the biamp idea to keep passive components. Why did you say I had to keep the passive part for the high freq ?
    On the 4430/35 when in biamp mode network provides the EQ needed for the horn. Check out the link for the correct curves, if you want to properly bi-amp the 4430/35 you need to go digital or find a 5235 crossover and use the proper cards. The required voltage drive isn't a simple curve to get the desired response from the system.

    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...hlight=52-5130

    Allen

  15. #15
    Mctwins
    Guest

    I am confused!!

    Quote Originally Posted by davidpou View Post
    No I have been misunderstood. The test is simply to put the preamp on mono so as to have the full audio message on one speaker (and not just the right voice) but the Crown would be run at 8 ohms so 2 times 215 W.

    I wanted to come back to your previous post: the best would be to connecte the HP directly onto the binding post and the filtering will be ONLY external, the passive filter can only induce bad response, and its contradictory with the biamp idea to keep passive components. Why did you say I had to keep the passive part for the high freq ?
    Hallo!

    In your first post you said Crown XLS 1500, has 300 Watts into 8 ohms. Here you are talking about Crown XLS 1000, 215 Watts into 8 ohms. Now, which amp are you gonna use?

    What preamp are you using? If you mean "to put preamp on mono" by using a y-link, please explain?

    Keep the passive(network) inside the 4430 and use external active x-over unit, or, as Allen said, use a 5235 crossover.

    Some links...
    https://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j...79142246,d.bGQ

    https://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j...79142246,d.bGQ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Crown Vs. Crown..The China Syndrome !
    By jeenie67 in forum Professional Amps
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-17-2016, 09:57 AM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-30-2013, 04:23 PM
  3. Crown XLS 1500
    By Rusnzha in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-13-2011, 02:17 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-02-2009, 09:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •