Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: JBL 4435 vs 4343 Opinions?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    42

    Lightbulb JBL 4435 vs 4343 Opinions?

    Hi all,

    A set of 4343's have recently popped up for sale in the neighborhood and as an owner of a set of 4435's i'm wondering if the 4343's would bring anything extra to the table or would this be a lateral move at best?

    Thanks for the feedback!

    P.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Champster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by DonBocadillo View Post
    Hi all,

    A set of 4343's have recently popped up for sale in the neighborhood and as an owner of a set of 4435's i'm wondering if the 4343's would bring anything extra to the table or would this be a lateral move at best?

    Thanks for the feedback!

    P.
    I would, personally, consider the 4343 an upgrade, but I think it is largely a matter of personal preference.

    Paul

  3. #3
    Senior Member richluvsound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    london england
    Posts
    2,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Champster View Post
    I would, personally, consider the 4343 an upgrade, but I think it is largely a matter of personal preference.

    Paul
    I miss my 4435s more than 4345s …. 4435's had far better off axis sound for home use …. Just my 2 cents worth .

    I If I had them still i'd be looking to put a Be based CD in there .


    Rich

  4. #4
    Senior Member HCSGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    752
    I have 4343's and 4430's, and am generally more satisfied with the sound of the 4430's - they image much better. The 4343's have a smaller sweet spot and don't have good image focus even there. I also think the 4430's have more HF Detail, though they have less HF output. However, I am not in love with either in this regard, and so have a set of TAD drivers waiting to try in the 4430's and S3100's to see how much improvement I can get. However, up loud, the 4343's have more punch. If I were to get rid of one pair, it would be the 4343's, but I'm more of a HiFi dude and low level listener - not really the 4343's intended customer.
    That the internet contains a blog documenting your life does not constitute proof that your existence is valid. Sorry.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    42
    Thanks for the feedback...looks like I'll have to hold out for a set of 4345's :-)

  6. #6
    Senior Member martin2395's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    928
    The 4343 doesn't image at all but the sound has a lot of depth (at least to my ears).
    Yes, the sweet spot is very small but it doesn't matter to me because my listening position never changes.

    The BiRadials sound smoother and throw a bigger soundstage but I like the older designs more, they are FUN!

    I'd jump on em if the price is right and upgrade the units to 2441, 2122/23 and 2235H, probably a pair of new CC networks would make an even bigger difference.

    Oh yes and for me the 4343's have the looks to die for

  7. #7
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703

    4343 horizontal disparsion

    Quote Originally Posted by martin2395 View Post
    The 4343 doesn't image at all ...............
    Yes, the sweet spot is very small but it doesn't matter to me because my listening position never changes.

    The BiRadials sound smoother and throw a bigger soundstage but I like the older designs more, they are FUN!

    ................
    Hi martin2395,

    Are You using 2308 lenses on the mentioned 4343, boxes?
    I have just opposite feeling while listening 4333.....
    I have experience that 2308 lenses have wide dispersion angle in the horizontal plane.

    Regards
    Ivica

  8. #8
    Senior Member martin_wu99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Xi'An,China
    Posts
    1,479
    Quote Originally Posted by DonBocadillo View Post
    Hi all,

    A set of 4343's have recently popped up for sale in the neighborhood and as an owner of a set of 4435's i'm wondering if the 4343's would bring anything extra to the table or would this be a lateral move at best?

    Thanks for the feedback!

    P.
    I like the sound of 4343,the image of 4435.
    46 lover

  9. #9
    Senior Member martin2395's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    928
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    Hi martin2395,

    Are You using 2308 lenses on the mentioned 4343, boxes?
    I have just opposite feeling while listening 4333.....
    I have experience that 2308 lenses have wide dispersion angle in the horizontal plane.

    Regards
    Ivica
    Hi Ivica,

    Yes, I do have the 2308's but with H93 horns and 2441 drivers behind em. They sound big and spacious but that doesn't mean that they image good

    Maybe a different design of the lens would help?

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Land of Sunshine
    Posts
    423
    Go to jbl43.com and search for video clips for 4343 and 4430 or 4435. I'm sure you'll come to the same conclusion...

  11. #11
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,754
    Quote Originally Posted by ngccglp View Post
    Go to jbl43.com and search for video clips for 4343 and 4430 or 4435. I'm sure you'll come to the same conclusion...
    I conclude they all sound a lot like . . . my laptop speakers!
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Land of Sunshine
    Posts
    423
    Haha, follow his instructions, plugged in your head/ear phones and crank it up. The difference between the 44 series and the 43 series is quite apparent, which is why the 43 still fetches a premium over the 44 series.

  13. #13
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by ngccglp View Post
    Haha, follow his instructions, plugged in your head/ear phones and crank it up.
    ... what about the process of sound recording

  14. #14
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,754
    Quote Originally Posted by ngccglp View Post
    Haha, follow his instructions, plugged in your head/ear phones and crank it up.
    Unless you're hearing them both with your ears in the same room at the same time . . .
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  15. #15
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWCCA View Post
    Unless you're hearing them both with your ears in the same room at the same time . . .
    totaly agree with that and i'm always surprise how people can compare JBL monitor speakers from youtube even from the best PC sound card with the best earphones ... and without knowing the whole rec/play process!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JBL L-50 opinions please
    By Bill Ding in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-07-2009, 03:33 AM
  2. opinions
    By hector.murray in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-13-2005, 06:39 PM
  3. Blue vs Black (4343 vs 4435)
    By John Nebel in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 08-12-2004, 03:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •