Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: What Surround/Satellites to go with Array 1400s?

  1. #16
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,092
    Opps, all I saw mentioned was theater.

    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  2. #17
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,719
    Quote Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post
    I agree the 880 is overkill for surrounds. But it wouldn't be the first time that was done. (overkill I mean) But where on earth would you ever find 4 of them?
    Interesting statement. In my world most people buy new speakers... I imagine if I ordered a hundred of them it might take a bit of time to have the order filled, but four isn't an issue.

    Like Barry, I was thinking surround sound as in HT. For a music system, I agree you do want the speakers to be voiced as closely as possible.


    Widget

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863
    Quote Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post
    I agree the 880 is overkill for surrounds. But it wouldn't be the first time that was done. (overkill I mean) But where on earth would you ever find 4 of them?
    I still kick myself for not buying an 880 when Harman was doing their "closeout" deal a few years back. RobH got the last one, and his posting that he had scored it made me realize I had missed that unit when perusing the offerings. Now they sell for about 4X what those were going for

  4. #19
    Senior Member hsosdrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by 1audiohack View Post
    Agreed. In real theaters the boxes hanging on the side walls share no common components with the front mains. They are purpose built though.

    Barry.
    Yep. Surround channels for film do a completely different job than surround channels for multi-channel music. Surround speakers in real movie theaters are not intended to reproduce discrete music sources the way they do in a home setup playing 5.1- or 7.1-channel music; they're designed for a film's ambient effects and momentary directional effects, so a tonal mis-match with the screen channels does not interfere with the illusion they're designed to create. In fact, it helps the illusion, since there is a tonal shift in real-life sounds as they arrive at our ears from different angles or move around our heads. And the comb-filtering created by the differing arrival times from multiple surround speakers would negate any carefully-matched tonal similarity between a theater's surround channels and screen channels.

    The keys to creating a believable film surround illusion in a home are 1) Placement. The surround speakers must be located far above the listeners' heads. Real ambient sounds are perceived as coming from above, so locating the surround speakers high up increases the realism of this illusion, and 2) Less-specific directionality. Real ambient sounds are more difficult to localize than are sounds that occur in front of our heads. Speakers that broadcast sound so that its source can be easily localized don't work as well when only 2 surround speakers are employed as do speakers that make it harder for the brain to determine where the sound is coming from. Having timbre that closely matches the screen channels is a distant third behind the previous two qualities.

    HOWEVER, if your system is primarily intended to reproduce 5.1- and/or 7.1-channel music, the #1 attribute of the surround speakers should be having timbre that matches the front channels as closely as possible.

    And for both film reproduction and multi-channel music reproduction, the center speaker should be identical to the left and right speakers. Period. The less identical it is, the less good the system will sound with both films and multi-channel music. I guarantee that a system with 3 Array 1400s across the front will outperform one with 2 Array 1400s for left/right and 1 Array 880 for center when playing films and multi-channel music. I realize that in most cases using 3 identical speakers across the front is impractical, but anything less than that is a compromise, no ifs, ands or buts. (Of course, pretty much everything about audio reproduction is some sort of compromise. The crux of the biscuit is making the ones that you can best live with.)

  5. #20
    Senior Member rdgrimes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    2,216
    Using ANY center speaker is a trade-off. Virtually everything will sound better coming from 2 front speakers compared to one. Phantom center setups are under-used and under-rated.

  6. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863
    Quote Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post
    Using ANY center speaker is a trade-off. Virtually everything will sound better coming from 2 front speakers compared to one. Phantom center setups are under-used and under-rated.
    Wanna sell that 880?

  7. #22
    Senior Member hsosdrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post
    Using ANY center speaker is a trade-off. Virtually everything will sound better coming from 2 front speakers compared to one. Phantom center setups are under-used and under-rated.
    When program material is created with the intent that it be reproduced via an L/C/R front-channel setup (all films made since 1976 and a large number of multi-channel music recordings), playing it back without a dedicated center channel (i.e. via phantom center) will always be 100% wrong.

    You may like it better, but it will still be wrong, because unlike stereo music recordings, which are created in studios built to absolutely no consistent acoustic performance standards (therefore there's no objective reference for how the recording is supposed to sound), film soundtracks and many multi-channel music recordings are created in dubbing stages that are built to adhere to SMPTE acoustical performance standards and all sound pretty much the same. This results in an objective reference for how their creator intends them to sound. Since all dubbing stages (100% of them) have a dedicated center channel and speaker (large ones have 5 screen channels), and since all film soundtracks and many (if not most) multi-channel music recordings are mixed for reproduction via 3 front channels (L/C/R), reproducing them with a phantom center is wrong. You may like it better, but you're not hearing what the artist intended you to hear. You can put on a pair of tinted glasses to look at the Mona Lisa and think "Wow, the flesh-tones are even more realistic; I like this better!", but you shouldn't fool yourself into thinking that you're seeing what Da Vinci wanted you to see. (I won't even get into how the comb filtering that phantom center creates changes the sound by altering the spectral balance of any sound that's reproduced equally by both speakers.) Again, I'm only talking about films and music created with the intention of being reproduced through an L/C/R system. With 2-channel music recordings all bets are off.

    And phantom-center systems will only work for a single listener, which I've always thought is one of the biggest reasons why high-end audio will always remain a very small "niche" hobby: you can't share the experience. You can take turns sitting in the sweet-spot, but somebody's always on the outside looking in. Using a dedicated center channel eliminates this "winner-take-all" aspect of music listening. A properly set-up system with a dedicated center channel allows multiple listeners to share the same sonic experience.

    It's interesting to note that conventional "phantom center" stereo sound reproduction (1 sound source -> 2 microphones -> 2 recording/reproduction channels -> 2 amplification channels -> 2 speakers -> 2 ears) has no counterpart in the natural world; no naturally-occurring sound is created and experienced that way.

    P.S. All properly set-up 2-channel stereo systems and all headphones are phantom-center setups, so I would be reluctant to characterize them as "under-used."

  8. #23
    Senior Member baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Haugesund, Norway
    Posts
    824
    Quote Originally Posted by audiomagnate View Post
    I agree. I think positioning - especially proper height - and adequate dynamic capability are important, but the suggestion that the rears be tonally identical to the fronts is just marketing hype to sell more speakers from the same company. How often do voices come from the rears after all?
    I have to disagree!!

    I've had two setups running identical speakers in front and back, first was 5 x JBL HT1 THX and the second was a setup With JBL 8340 both in front and as surround. It give much more natural and a "complete" sound useing identical speakers and I really miss it now With my current setup. Now I'm running 8xJBL 8340 as surround and Atmos speakers and 3 x large (identical) JBL Pro cinema in front. Of course the front speakers now are way better but I really miss the effect identical speakers gave me.

  9. #24
    Senior Member audiomagnate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado and Georgia
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post
    Using ANY center speaker is a trade-off. Virtually everything will sound better coming from 2 front speakers compared to one. Phantom center setups are under-used and under-rated.
    I was going to say that, but I say it every time multichannel systems are brought up and didn't want to beat a dead horse. I don't have a problem with a center channel speaker that is identical to the mains, but that is rarely done, usually for the reason that it would block the screen, or for economic, practical or esthetic concerns. The other reason I prefer 4.x (where x = or > 2!) is that the purpose of the center channel is to keep vocals coming from the center of the screen for off-center listeners. I'll bet nobody posting here listens off-center themselves; we all love our "sweet spots" after all. As for other viewer/listeners (guests), let's face it, most of them don't give a crap. If they do we can stick them in the center and suffer through a movie or listening session for the duration of their visit. Now if your listening/viewing is habitually done with a partner who is also an audiophile, consider yourself blessed and by all means figure out how to do a center channel correctly.

  10. #25
    Senior Member audiomagnate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado and Georgia
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by baldrick View Post
    I have to disagree!!

    I've had two setups running identical speakers in front and back, first was 5 x JBL HT1 THX and the second was a setup With JBL 8340 both in front and as surround. It give much more natural and a "complete" sound useing identical speakers and I really miss it now With my current setup. Now I'm running 8xJBL 8340 as surround and Atmos speakers and 3 x large (identical) JBL Pro cinema in front. Of course the front speakers now are way better but I really miss the effect identical speakers gave me.
    The we can agree to disagree. I would much rather have slightly mismatched but excellent speakers all around than four (or five) lesser quality but matched speakers. In one of my systems I had (modified) L300's up front and ADS L1530's in the rear with three good subs and and the sound was terrific for movies and music. It was orders of magnitude better than fully matched systems of lower quality I've set up. Now 5 L300's and a sub swarm would be even better, but I'd want to get the rear L300's in up the air, which isn't exactly easy and would look downright weird. L1530's make superb surround speakers because of their lack of coloration and superb dynamic capability and wide response, as well as their form factor; minimum depth and perfect height which is actually a little high for use as mains.

  11. #26
    Senior Member baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Haugesund, Norway
    Posts
    824
    Quote Originally Posted by audiomagnate View Post
    I would much rather have slightly mismatched but excellent speakers all around than four (or five) lesser quality but matched speakers.
    I agree on this part that much better speaker in front is even more important than identical and that's what I chose at home. BUT I don't agree to this part: "that the rears be tonally identical to the fronts is just marketing hype to sell more speakers from the same Company." Because if possible speakers really should be identical.

    And now with Dolby Atmos many people use one type of speakers as surrounds and others in the ceiling... it's absolutly not a good solution! You hear it when the sound move from speaker to speaker... With identical speakers you don't and the shound just floats! And this is the problem you get also with noneidentical speakers in front

  12. #27
    Senior Member rdgrimes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    2,216
    Quote Originally Posted by baldrick View Post
    I agree on this part that much better speaker in front is even more important than identical and that's what I chose at home. BUT I don't agree to this part: "that the rears be tonally identical to the fronts is just marketing hype to sell more speakers from the same Company." Because if possible speakers really should be identical.
    I'm with you. And I suspect that folks who say otherwise haven't spent much time with a completely matched setup, or just don't listen to much 5.1. The difference can be quite striking. Its the reason that any current processor has a complex PEQ setup system - partly to help deal with dissimilar speakers.

    Anyhow, spending more and more time with the Array/PT800 system and not finding any perceivable shortcomings to the PT800 as an Array surround. I'm recommending it to anyone who's interested.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JBL Control 1 summertime project surround array and more!
    By JBL 4645 in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 12:29 AM
  2. Satellites Using LE5 and 044
    By Zekeman in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-14-2007, 09:11 AM
  3. JBL control 1 multi- surround array
    By JBL 4645 in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2006, 02:17 PM
  4. is that a foam surround or a textile surround ?
    By Steelyfan in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-20-2006, 01:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •