since k2s9900 announced for years,and because of s9500 with s5500,s9800 with 5800,i think s9900 will have his younger brother s5900 soon
the drivers would be 2x1201FE(jerry will make it),435AL,045TI, who konws?
How do you think?
And we have'nt seen 18 inches large format studio monitor for a long time,will it be?
46 lover
that's because the "bedroom" DJs/Producers (a market segment buying a ton of production gear in recent years) would have no place to put the monitors...Originally Posted by martin_wu99
The SRX738 would be the closest match
Hi pos,have'n see you for times.
What's your guess on K2 series and studio monitor series that will issue next?
What you mean is that you don't like huge 18' in your room?that's because the "bedroom" DJs/Producers (a market segment buying a ton of production gear in recent years) would have no place to put the monitors...
After k2s9500 and 66000,we don't see double 15' speakers for a long time either,what's wrong with JBL?
We are not the average buyer
We don't care about big boxes and multiple 15 and 18 speakers in our room -
for us its about the results and the beautiful sound IS the result!
Other people prefer beautiful rooms, and speakers are not beautiful to them,
so speakers for them must be small and hidden.
So - better for us in the used speaker market!
2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460
i have in my basement stereo system:
4x JBL 2241 (2x 4642A cabinets, 1 per side)
4x TAD 1601a (2 sealed cabinets per side)
2x JBL 2440 be diaphragms on 350Hz edgar or DAS acoustical lens horn
2x JBL 076
2x Fostex bullet
plus four EAW SB48 (dual 8") subwoofers that I am playing around with....
although my wife thinks the system is too large,
i remind her of the physics studies she did at university
and that I am in an empirical testing phase still....
it's a fun system to play with, IMO....
Hi Martin!Hi pos,have'n see you for times.
What's your guess on K2 series and studio monitor series that will issue next?
The 4345 was the only hifi/monitoring speaker produced by JBL to embark a 18", and I think it was not such a success at the time (probably due to the passive xover)
a quote from GT about the 4345 and its reception in the studio monitoring market at the time:
Fact is dual 15" is assisted alignment (4435 or E2, with only one of the two drivers reaching a high crossover point) seems to typically produce better/deeper/cleaner bass than a single 18"It was never very successful during its life time primarily due to its size. Most people would get something smaller. It also had a reputation for less than detailed bass, which I have always thought was due to the enclosure not being quite large enough.
(that being said, I have 18" in my system, because I think 15" are for sissies))
What's wrong with 15's?!? They make perfectly good mid-bass drivers.I think 15" are for sissies
If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.
You know... I'm beginning to agree with you.(that being said, I have 18" in my system, because I think 15" are for sissies
All joking aside, the E145 is an awesome mid-bass driver... I guess it can go low enough for some, but augmented by a sub it is simply an outstanding mid-bass. The 2220s aren't bad either, but the curvilinear cone is prone to break up when pushed.What's wrong with 15's?!? They make perfectly good mid-bass drivers.
Widget
Man do I feel inadequate nowHi Martin!
The 4345 was the only hifi/monitoring speaker produced by JBL to embark a 18", and I think it was not such a success at the time (probably due to the passive xover)
a quote from GT about the 4345 and its reception in the studio monitoring market at the time:
Fact is dual 15" is assisted alignment (4435 or E2, with only one of the two drivers reaching a high crossover point) seems to typically produce better/deeper/cleaner bass than a single 18"
(that being said, I have 18" in my system, because I think 15" are for sissies
That's impressive.
i have in my basement stereo system:
4x JBL 2241 (2x 4642A cabinets, 1 per side)
4x TAD 1601a (2 sealed cabinets per side)
2x JBL 2440 be diaphragms on 350Hz edgar or DAS acoustical lens horn
2x JBL 076
2x Fostex bullet
plus four EAW SB48 (dual 8") subwoofers that I am playing around with....
although my wife thinks the system is too large,
i remind her of the physics studies she did at university
and that I am in an empirical testing phase still....
it's a fun system to play with, IMO....
18' is too difficult to handle with? why Westlake has many 18' loudspeakers?Hi Martin!
The 4345 was the only hifi/monitoring speaker produced by JBL to embark a 18", and I think it was not such a success at the time (probably due to the passive xover)
a quote from GT about the 4345 and its reception in the studio monitoring market at the time:
Fact is dual 15" is assisted alignment (4435 or E2, with only one of the two drivers reaching a high crossover point) seems to typically produce better/deeper/cleaner bass than a single 18"
(that being said, I have 18" in my system, because I think 15" are for sissies
Besides 66000,we need more duble 15' speakers nowWhat's wrong with 15's?!? They make perfectly good mid-bass drivers.
Does it work?,i'm a real pro gear lover,so far i think 4628B is the most suitable PA box that can be moved to the home.that is "pro sound go home".
Zilch may know this,what a pity he's gone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
