Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Truextent diaphragms measurements

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629

    Truextent diaphragms measurements

    Here is a set of measurements I made of the Truextent Be4016 beryllium dipahragn (16ohm version) in a 2450SL core (1.5") on the rectangular 90x50 PT waveguide (PT-F95HF).
    For comparison purpose the measurements also include other JBL OEM diaphragms.

    All measurements were taken under the exact same conditions:

    - dayton mic calibrated by cross spectrum
    - mic at ~40cm from the horn mouth (not far enough to get a meaningful response curve, but ok for comparison purpose), exact same position for all measurement
    - Studio Projects VTB1 V preamp ("tube blend" turned off)
    - creative labs sound card (line level), not calibrated
    - holmimpulse software in sweep mode
    - Ev dx46 active crossover in digital input mode, no eq or filter except a FIR HP at 600Hz (no influence on phase)
    - Ram-audio S4044 power amp set to a very moderate SPL
    - 75uf protection capacitor (shall not have much influence on phase above 1.5khz, even for the 8ohms diaphragms)
    - PTF-95HF horn (no really usable under 1khz, so only the HF response can really be compared)
    - 2450SL core (1.5" coherent wave phasing plug, 4" diaphragm, neodymium motor)

    The diaphragms under test are:

    - JBL D8R2450SL (2450SL): 8 ohms 4" Titanium diaphragm without ribs but with aquaplas, used in the 2450SL, 2452H-SL, and 475nd
    - JBL D8R2450 (2450Ti) : 8 ohms 4" Titanium diaphragm with ribs, used in the 2446H/2450H/2451H
    - Truextent Be4016 (2450Be) : 16 ohms 4" Beryllium diaphragm

    The 16ohms truextent diaphragm was of course given 3dB more level in the active crossover, so every diaphragm received approximately the same wattage, as is confirmed by the fact that the levels are matched in the low end.

    As you will see the measurements do track the ones found in the Truextent white paper quite well:
    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...351#post305351


    In a second set of measurements, post #4, the 2450Be is compared to a 2435HPL

  2. #2
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    amplitude
    Name:  amplitude.png
Views: 9899
Size:  15.1 KB

    phase
    Name:  phase.png
Views: 5967
Size:  15.5 KB

    noise
    Name:  noise.png
Views: 5811
Size:  17.9 KB

    THD
    Name:  THD.png
Views: 5986
Size:  16.4 KB

    2nd harmonic distortion

    Name:  2nd.png
Views: 5935
Size:  17.1 KB

  3. #3
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    3rd harmonic distortion

    Name:  3rd.png
Views: 5616
Size:  17.4 KB


    impulse comparisons

    Name:  impulse sl vs ti.png
Views: 5807
Size:  16.2 KB

    Name:  impulse ti vs be.png
Views: 5794
Size:  16.5 KB

    Name:  impulse sl vs be.png
Views: 5692
Size:  16.5 KB

  4. #4
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629

    Truextent vs 2435HPL

    Hereafter is a second set of measurement, taken under very similar condition as the first one, this time comparing the 2450SL with Truextent diaphragm (2450Be) to a not aquaplassed 2435HPL (2435).

    Note: it is well known that the 2435 short phasing plug has a "problem" with the PT-F95HF that results in a dip at ~13khz (as well as very poor off axis behavior). This problem does not exists (or to a much lesser extend) on the H9800 and some other horns (the off axis behavior remains bad in the UHF tho, because of the 3 slits phase plug)

    amplitude
    Name:  2435 vs 2450Be.png
Views: 6579
Size:  15.9 KB

    phase
    Name:  2435 vs 2450Be phase.png
Views: 5779
Size:  16.1 KB

    2nd harmonic distortion
    Name:  2435 vs 2450Be 2nd.png
Views: 6215
Size:  17.8 KB

    3rd harmonic distortion

    Name:  2435 vs 2450Be 3rd.png
Views: 5907
Size:  18.1 KB

    impulse
    Name:  impulse Be vs 2435.png
Views: 5964
Size:  17.1 KB

  5. #5
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,735
    Cool... any other horns on the horizon?

    Widget

  6. #6
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    I have pairs of 2332 and H9800 that I will also try to measure (but probably only with the Be, and not the other diaphragms anymore).
    I chose the PT waveguide as it was the most well behaved in the HF, and the most representative of the natural behavior of the driver.
    The H9800 will probably be the horn I will use in my final system.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    BRIGHTON MI 48114
    Posts
    16

    Retrofitting with "truextent'

    Any JBL 2" format driver (except 2480,2482) will sound better, smoother , more detailed;
    Than any Alum. or Ti. fitted driver PERIOD Field coil versions of the truextent 4" and 3" 2435 dia
    are even better. Unless you are committed to a "vintage" sound .
    The driver/horn combo must remain the same in your comparisons.
    Frequency graphs will show "smoothness" but give no indication of detail,attack and decay,
    which are all a part of proper music reproduction
    jw5115

  8. #8
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    A little update with a more recent measurement comparing a 2452H and a 2450SL with truextent diaphragm on a PT-F95HF waveguide.

    It should be more reliable than the measurements on the first page because the noise/distortion coming from the amp has been minimized to have no impact on the measurement (using an autoformer or a Lpad, can't remember...).
    It is the 3rd order harmonic distortion only, as my mic is not good at measuring 2nd order harmonic distortion...

    Name:  2452H vs 2450Be disto.jpg
Views: 2806
Size:  94.3 KB

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Covington, Ohio
    Posts
    785
    Here's a link to Vue Audiotechnik and their info article on using Truextent diaphragms in their latest products.
    http://www.vueaudio.com/about/beryllium/

  10. #10
    Senior Member Champster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Caldwell View Post
    Here's a link to Vue Audiotechnik and their info article on using Truextent diaphragms in their latest products.
    http://www.vueaudio.com/about/beryllium/
    I had an opportunity to get a personal tour through VUE with Ken Berger, CEO. What a great guy and cool business. I wish I could work there... What great products too. Their DSP systems are killer. They have an isobaric sub with 4 - 18" drivers that I would love to try out at home. They are the only Pro company using Be as far as I know and, based on their growth, it sure looks like that gives them a great competitive advantage over the other guys.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-08-2011, 07:01 PM
  2. Got a email from Truextent
    By moparfan in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-02-2010, 08:13 PM
  3. Truextent Diaphragms in JBL four-inch compression drivers
    By 4313B in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: 03-29-2010, 09:41 AM
  4. Truextent 4" diaphragms available soon
    By Guido in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-23-2010, 03:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •