Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 4430 vs 4435

  1. #1
    leif
    Guest

    4430 vs 4435

    I have a pair 4430 (with alnico top) and consider a pair 4435.
    Any that have heard both og them? Experiences?

    Leif

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
    Posts
    2,291
    Quote Originally Posted by leif View Post
    I have a pair 4430 (with alnico top) and consider a pair 4435.
    Any that have heard both og them? Experiences?

    Leif
    4435 has more low end and slam then 4430

    If your using a B460 with your 4430 it might have the low end but I will guess the 4435 will have more slam.

    Now if you united a pair of 4435 + B460 well you might have to fasten your seat belts before you put your foot into her.

  3. #3
    Senior Member baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Haugesund, Norway
    Posts
    824
    Leif: It's my old pair of 4435 that is for sale. The cabinet need some work to get in proper condition and I think he said he also has broken one of the woofer.

    But if you are going to buy them I might be interested in your B460

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Pensacola Beach, FL
    Posts
    28

    4435

    I have the 4430s and a friend of mine has the 4435s. The 4435s have much better bass and the lower midrange sounds cleaner with a sense of ease on orchestral works. My 4430s are tubby sounding compared to the 4435s. Many modern recordings have too much bass emphasis and sound a bit bloated on the 4430s. If I had the room, I would defintely have the 4435s. I still consider the 4430 an excellent speaker just not as good as the 4435.

    I would like to raise the 4430s up 6 inches to see if it helps the bass. I am also considering changing out 2235s with some spare 2234s that I used in my paragon (in storage - need to sell). I wish truextent would start making diaphragms for the small format drivers.
    Stephen C.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
    Posts
    2,291
    Quote Originally Posted by rpstephen View Post
    I have the 4430s and a friend of mine has the 4435s. The 4435s have much better bass and the lower midrange sounds cleaner with a sense of ease on orchestral works. My 4430s are tubby sounding compared to the 4435s. Many modern recordings have too much bass emphasis and sound a bit bloated on the 4430s. If I had the room, I would defintely have the 4435s. I still consider the 4430 an excellent speaker just not as good as the 4435.

    I would like to raise the 4430s up 6 inches to see if it helps the bass.
    I have both and I have never heard my 4430's sound tubby

    They actually sound tight + snappy

    You sure there not up against a corner wall

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Pensacola Beach, FL
    Posts
    28

    4430

    Maybe "tubby" was not a good choice of words. It's just on certain recordings e.g. Jennifer Warnes The Hunter the whole room shakes on the bass notes. A lot of modern (digital) recordings have the very low frequencies emphasized and I don't care for that type of bass. Most of the older classical and jazz recordings are not a problem. I live in a condo and don't want to disturb the neighbors. What I really need is tone controls on my preamp! I still want to try switching out the woofers with the 2234s that I have.
    Stephen C.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,603
    Quote Originally Posted by rpstephen View Post
    Maybe "tubby" was not a good choice of words. It's just on certain recordings e.g. Jennifer Warnes The Hunter the whole room shakes on the bass notes. A lot of modern (digital) recordings have the very low frequencies emphasized and I don't care for that type of bass. Most of the older classical and jazz recordings are not a problem. I live in a condo and don't want to disturb the neighbors. What I really need is tone controls on my preamp! I still want to try switching out the woofers with the 2234s that I have.



    I have no problem with "tubby" because, on certain recordings, this is also the term I have used to describe them.

  8. #8
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    Optimized 4430 system

    I used a HK 3480 rcvr to run my 4430's and they were a bit thin on the bass but were nicer sounding across the rest of the bandwidth.

    I added a JBL 2242 in a 9 cu ft cab run off a PE sub plate amp and found that to be just heavenly.

    Also, while the HK 3480 was very well damped with lean bass response the top end made the HF cheeks sound much better than they actually were!

    Just my personal example is all...

    Ron
    JBL Pro for home use!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4430/4435 Help
    By Music Lover in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 10:30 PM
  2. 4430/4435 Phase problems
    By leif in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-07-2007, 03:41 PM
  3. 4430/B40 vs 4435
    By leif in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 02-26-2006, 12:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •