Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Real World Frequency Forms

  1. #16
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Peoria, Illinois
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffW View Post
    I was under the assumption that that was the entire idea behind building different/better/more accurate systems in the first place, to try to mimic the original source as closely as possible.
    Yes, I managed to state a problem so obvious it should never have seen the light of day. I have since had some sleep for a change wonder why in heck I posted it.
    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears

  2. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    I think it was a great question, and am glad it saw the light of day. I sure don't think anything I wrote is the final word on the subject, just as surely as no "perfect" sound reproduction system exists yet. Just look at the myriad of high end system reviews, virtually every one has some niggling little deficiency that keeps it from sounding just like the "real thing".

    So there's still something aside from perfectly reproducing a waveform that our brains and ears can detect as being a reproduction, so still room for discussion.

    I wonder if this isn't a continuation of a previous thread on digital reproduction?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. My first take in the JBL world
    By secanbj in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-17-2007, 06:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts