They are some wood horns made by Woody Banks, slightly smaller but similar to the Yuichi A-290.
They are some wood horns made by Woody Banks, slightly smaller but similar to the Yuichi A-290.
If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.
I have tried to invert the colours which makes the graphs more legible. Do let me know if it isn't helpful, and I will delete this post.
It is striking that there is suck-out at 19 kHz, regardless of the diaphragm material.
The graphs are in the same order as above, i.e. aluminum, beryllium, and titanium:
It looks better to me. I thought I should just change them to black on white, they are exported in bitmap originally and have great resolution and far better legibility but the files are huge. I should learn more about that kind of stuff but I don't do this kind of thing at all (post measurements and the like) except once in a while here. My apologies, and thanks.
There are more than a few things that interest and puzzle me. One being the 2nd harmonic of the Ti diaphragm beginning at about 7 kHz, the phase response of it (the 2nd harmonic) at that point takes a big jump out of time from that point on up where the other two metals don't, they just follow a relatively smooth curve on out. I have my suspicions but have drawn no conclusions as yet.
If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.
Nice measurements! In case you missed this I posted the Truextent White Paper in the Technical Reference Section. Might help answer some of your questions. The long and short are Be/Al/Ti in that order. The ribbed Ti diaphrams were the "worst" of the bunch. If you look at the wavelet analysis/waterfall the Al is quite good compared to the Be.
Rob
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...351#post305351
"I could be arguing in my spare time"
Thanks Rob, I did see and read that paper.
Part of what I am doing, besides exploring for fun is to continue to learn to make accurate meaningful measurements, in hopes of improving my own listening pleasures. TEF has many capabilities that I have yet to fully explore. I normally just buzz test, SPL and impedance sweep diaphragm installments and decided to take that a step further and distortion test them to see what you really get should they rub in the gap at all. That kind of led to some of what I posted. I really want to compare the SL's to the standard Ti's. TEF will do all the energy time analysis stuff, display in waterfall as well but if you think the line plots look bad by the time I get them exported, well,,.
If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.
I had a chance to listen to the Yamaha NS-1000’s this weekend. This was my first chance to audition any beryllium material. The main reason for the listening session was to find out when replacing my old diaphragms in the 2440’s, should I go OEM or Be. $1,200 vs $650 is a lot of coin to spend for me on an experiment, and the Be route meant the Altec 846B’s in storage would need be sold. I also didn’t know anyone in the South East Wisconsin area to actually audition a pair of JBL BE drivers, so I figured this would have to do. The Yamaha’s did sound great, but I’ve always been a horn fan. My question is this, if I would switch to Be in the 2440’s would they sound as detailed in the mids of the 1000’s and still have the dynamics of the horn? The system is currently a 2235/2440/2397/2405 with Giskards CC L300 Crossover.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)