Martin, please! Help us, translate!
I don't have a 2216Nd, but I do have a 1501Fe and can say it's a very capable driver.
Nd is the future and the 2216Nd will be the next generation of drivers, but for this old fossil I like the heavy cast frame ceramic driver!
I think with what is available that everyone will be happy. DSP will perform the necessary corrections for the future.
Ron
JBL Pro for home use!
What issue is this? Allegedly they are all available via download in multiple languages.
The editor of STEREO SOUND said, he compared S4700 with 4365 in same room with same gear:Accuphase C3800+P6100 or TAD MA2500 and TECHNICAL BRAIN TBC-Zero/EX+TBP-Zero/EX
Two systems are same design,they are both extensive two way systems,but the fineness,stability and the headroom of the sound are different,4365 is very like S9900,with 4' horn characteristic,if you like 4' horn ,you will not miss him.it is worth 1.7 times than S4700,consider S9900 is 2.3 times than 4365,the 4365 has little different with S9900.
In one word,4365 and S4700 are not in the same level.he will chose 4365.
Not like 4313B said,S4700 is better than 4365
46 lover
Thank you very much Martin!
Would that be Japanese magazine Stereo Sound? - http://www.stereosound.co.jp/
We already know that the new 43xx monitors for sale in Asian countries are voiced for the Japanese market,
which have a different desire for low low bass than the original 43xx series produced.
Saying that a Japanese magazine prefers one speaker over another may not equate for American tastes in sound.
No flames meant. Its just a statement that different markets treasure different kinds of sound.
2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460
I didn't say. The designer of both systems did. Despite the fact that the 4365 has the better components the S4700 is the preferred system over here.
And Heather got it right above, I just read her post.
Regardless, both systems have been so thoroughly marginalized by the M2 that they just don't matter anymore. It could have been beneficial for both the 4365 and S4700 if the M2 had been delayed a few more years.
The K2-S9800 and K2-S9900, wonderful as they are, really aren't my personal cup of tea either. I much prefer the 1200 Array, 1400 Array and Everest II.
That brings a question to mind. What makes the M2 so good compared to the s4700? Is it the horn or the D2 driver? We all know they use the same bass driver. I presume you would say the DSP. I know there are threads here suggesting using DSP for the different monitors aswell. Would there be another matter as to "what speaker is the best" if they all had use of a DSP?Regardless, both systems have been so thoroughly marginalized by the M2 that they just don't matter anymore. It could have been beneficial for both the 4365 and S4700 if the M2 had been delayed a few more years.
/Mostly
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)