Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 83 of 83

Thread: JBL 2445_46 frq.response

  1. #76
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    I have decided to "fill-in" the large cavity under voice coil path, and the i will make new measurements to see what would happen. I expect that the efficiency would rise, and that the notch would move towards higher frequency, may be 'out of the interest'.
    After some problems, I have done, but notch remain, so now may be some experiments with phase-plug.....

  2. #77
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    7
    Hi, has the back sticker of the 2446J changed at some point? In the attached pictures there are two different 2446J drivers (serial numbers 16992 and 01679). Their back stickers are little different from each other, the color is different and the little text reads "JBL incorporated ..." in the newer and "James B Lansing Sound..." in the older. I found that at least 2445J drivers had the "James B. Lansing..." text, but did also the first 2446Js had it and the sticker was changed at some point? If this is the case, I take there should not be significant (/any) changes in measured performance of different patches?

    Regards,

    Legis
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  3. #78
    Senior Member Mike F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by Legis View Post
    Hi, has the back sticker of the 2446J changed at some point? In the attached pictures there are two different 2446J drivers (serial numbers 16992 and 01679). Their back stickers are little different from each other, the color is different and the little text reads "JBL incorporated ..." in the newer and "James B Lansing Sound..." in the older. I found that at least 2445J drivers had the "James B. Lansing..." text, but did also the first 2446Js had it and the sticker was changed at some point? If this is the case, I take there should not be significant (/any) changes in measured performance of different patches?

    Regards,

    Legis
    Have you measured or listened to the drivers?

  4. #79
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Legis View Post
    Hi, has the back sticker of the 2446J changed at some point? In the attached pictures there are two different 2446J drivers (serial numbers 16992 and 01679). Their back stickers are little different from each other, the color is different and the little text reads "JBL incorporated ..." in the newer and "James B Lansing Sound..." in the older. I found that at least 2445J drivers had the "James B. Lansing..." text, but did also the first 2446Js had it and the sticker was changed at some point? If this is the case, I take there should not be significant (/any) changes in measured performance of different patches?

    Regards,

    Legis
    JBL dropped the whole James B. Lansing Sound thing years ago.

    I suspect it finally got too costly to print all that out on everything.

  5. #80
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
    Have you measured or listened to the drivers?
    No I haven't but I will as soon as I get them.

  6. #81
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,735
    Quote Originally Posted by Legis View Post
    I take there should not be significant (/any) changes in measured performance of different patches?
    There shouldn't be, but I'd be surprised if these two drivers measure identically. I have measured a number of used JBLs and depending on the life they have led, their performance can be all over the map.


    Widget

  7. #82
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    There shouldn't be, but I'd be surprised if these two drivers measure identically. I have measured a number of used JBLs and depending on the life they have led, their performance can be all over the map.


    Widget
    I have almost the same experience with the old and 'older' used JBL drivers, that their responses are different, but generally (all measured with 2311 horn and 2308 lens) older diaphragms have some losses ( up to several dB-s) in the region from about 1.5kHz to about 3~4kHz, , and may be expectable over 10kHz. I vane no idea what are the reasons why mentioned losses happened. May some structural characteristics of titanium dome or suspension have changed over time, or over 'heavy" usage.
    If it is assumed that the dome radius is near about 3 inch ( some calculation give "me" R=2 27/32"=72mm), that would lead to the maximal line over the dome mid-point of about 110mm what would, may be, correspond to wave length around 3.1kHz, and half wave length around 1.55kHz, but unfortunately, I have not seen any, technically acceptable, explanation of such "phenomena" .
    May be some of the forum members have better explanation.

    Regards
    Ivica
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  8. #83
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    7
    Interesting, I hope the differences are not that great with my pair. I actually planned to use them with original phrams for the first few months in order to get to know the drivers, and then at some point change to beryllium phrams (Truextent), so the bigger factor is the mint looks than the condition of the original dia. My main concern was that the other one is a counterfeit driver, but I quess this is not the case.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Frequency Response
    By Mr. Widget in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 12:20 PM
  2. Step Response
    By Robh3606 in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-09-2009, 05:14 PM
  3. Need help with bass response
    By invstbiker in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 136
    Last Post: 05-11-2006, 02:06 PM
  4. Do These Look Right? (Need Fast Response Please)
    By toddalin in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-28-2005, 11:41 AM
  5. Does Ti Increase UHF Response?
    By Mr. Widget in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-25-2005, 02:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •