I thought some may find this an interesting read. James Tanner, The person I bought these from wrote about the Arrays.
AHH, one thing I notice in James words is the crossover point. 750hz, and this point allows the compression driver a very nice dynamic sound that really shines on percussions and transients. I have been using THAT 750hz point for ages, and I don't like it lower, OR higher, 750 is the #.
As far as the NOT as in yer face as other traditional horn systems, that might not be bad, even tho some of the old horn systems were very lively and dynamic, some of them could become fatiguing to the ears after a while. And then, these are for home use, where I personally do NOT have enough space for a fully horn loaded rig to operate properly. So I like the idea of the ported bas enclosure mated to that horn/comp driver for my living room.
Interesting read, and thanks for posting.
scottyj
It isn't arbitrary, that's where the horn/c.d. combo begins to roll off and Greg uses that mechanical roll-off along with the electrical roll-off in the high pass filter to create the 24 dB/octave acoustic roll-off. The low frequency transducer has to be able to meet the horn at that point.
If memory serves me, the SAM1HF transition to the SAM2LF target is 890 Hz. If true, this is no doubt possible with the nut-cracking range/power of the SAM2's dual 8s.
Out.
Probably more to due with the match in directivity at the crossover point.this is no doubt possible with the nut-cracking range/power of the SAM2's dual 8s.
Rob
"I could be arguing in my spare time"
I understand that, but, at the same time, I have things that are able to be used with different xover points, and have alway found I like what I hear at 750hz, you can even hear it from coming down from 800hz.
I know it is the proper point for this horn, but there is a certain trait in the sound. That TINY TINY little bit of excursion is audible, or what sounds like that, in a good way.
Particularly with JBL comp drivers.
scottyj
Thanks for the link. It's interesting to see how similar his feelings about horns are to mine and how this somewhat colored his preconceptions about the 1400s. He's absolutely correct that the Array Series is so un-hornlike that you wouldn't identify it as such unless you already knew. Same for the SAMs only perhaps more so since they are running with greater sensitivity.
I will say, the Everest II is even better, but for those of us who still live in the middle class, the Array Series is as good as it gets for ANY horn-based consumer system I've ever heard. I haven't heard the K2 S9900, but I prefer the over all sound of the Array to the K2 S9800, though it's hard not to be impressed with the overall sheer strength of the K2.
It will be interesting to see how your appreciation changes as your ears and listening habits get accustomed to your wonderful 1400 Arrays. James Tanner seemed to go through an evolution of his own as he gained experience with them.
Out.
Yeah, the S9800 didn't add up to the sum of its parts. The S9900 does though.I haven't heard the K2 S9900, but I prefer the over all sound of the Array to the K2 S9800, though it's hard not to be impressed with the overall sheer strength of the K2.
The Arrays are super tough to beat. I really need to get four Synthesis 8's before they "go foreign". After June of this year JBL ceases to be a viable brand for me personally. It's been a great 35 year run though!
Congratulations Tom on getting your Arrays .
- Have you played with various angles of toe-in ?Originally Posted by tom
- Dr. Geddes recommends as much as 45 degrees for his Summas .
Originally Posted by tom- I agree ,the usage of bigger diaphragms ( compression types ) can lead to greater resolution ( clarity ) once some of the (typical) horn issues have been addressed .Originally Posted by Tom
I'm looking forwards to some photos .
<> cheers
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)