Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 60

Thread: My Project 1400 Array's..

  1. #16
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    I'm not there yet... but I am teetering on the fence and will possibly join that club.


    Widget
    I want to hear these, and after a good season I would probably want to be a member too! I hear really good things about this particular speaker system.

    scottyj

  2. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Coast of Maine
    Posts
    541
    I thought some may find this an interesting read. James Tanner, The person I bought these from wrote about the Arrays.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  3. #18
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343
    AHH, one thing I notice in James words is the crossover point. 750hz, and this point allows the compression driver a very nice dynamic sound that really shines on percussions and transients. I have been using THAT 750hz point for ages, and I don't like it lower, OR higher, 750 is the #.

    As far as the NOT as in yer face as other traditional horn systems, that might not be bad, even tho some of the old horn systems were very lively and dynamic, some of them could become fatiguing to the ears after a while. And then, these are for home use, where I personally do NOT have enough space for a fully horn loaded rig to operate properly. So I like the idea of the ported bas enclosure mated to that horn/comp driver for my living room.

    Interesting read, and thanks for posting.
    scottyj

  4. #19
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    It isn't arbitrary, that's where the horn/c.d. combo begins to roll off and Greg uses that mechanical roll-off along with the electrical roll-off in the high pass filter to create the 24 dB/octave acoustic roll-off. The low frequency transducer has to be able to meet the horn at that point.

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042
    If memory serves me, the SAM1HF transition to the SAM2LF target is 890 Hz. If true, this is no doubt possible with the nut-cracking range/power of the SAM2's dual 8s.
    Out.

  6. #21
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    this is no doubt possible with the nut-cracking range/power of the SAM2's dual 8s.
    Probably more to due with the match in directivity at the crossover point.

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  7. #22
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    It isn't arbitrary, that's where the horn/c.d. combo begins to roll off and Greg uses that mechanical roll-off along with the electrical roll-off in the high pass filter to create the 24 dB/octave acoustic roll-off. The low frequency transducer has to be able to meet the horn at that point.
    I understand that, but, at the same time, I have things that are able to be used with different xover points, and have alway found I like what I hear at 750hz, you can even hear it from coming down from 800hz.

    I know it is the proper point for this horn, but there is a certain trait in the sound. That TINY TINY little bit of excursion is audible, or what sounds like that, in a good way.

    Particularly with JBL comp drivers.
    scottyj

  8. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Probably more to due with the match in directivity at the crossover point.

    Rob
    True enough, but without the SAM2's 92dB sensitivity (the SAM1 is not "dialed back" like in the 1400 Array) and ability to extend beyond 900 Hz, directivity alone would be insufficient.

    However, you're a builder and I'm a listener, so...
    Out.

  9. #24
    Senior Member Valentin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    725
    Quote Originally Posted by tom1040 View Post
    I thought some may find this an interesting read. James Tanner, The person I bought these from wrote about the Arrays.
    James Tanner is the one of the owners of Bryston

  10. #25
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,736
    Quote Originally Posted by Valentin View Post
    James Tanner is the one of the owners of Bryston
    Is he moving up to Everest II's?

  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042
    Quote Originally Posted by tom1040 View Post
    I thought some may find this an interesting read. James Tanner, The person I bought these from wrote about the Arrays.
    Thanks for the link. It's interesting to see how similar his feelings about horns are to mine and how this somewhat colored his preconceptions about the 1400s. He's absolutely correct that the Array Series is so un-hornlike that you wouldn't identify it as such unless you already knew. Same for the SAMs only perhaps more so since they are running with greater sensitivity.

    I will say, the Everest II is even better, but for those of us who still live in the middle class, the Array Series is as good as it gets for ANY horn-based consumer system I've ever heard. I haven't heard the K2 S9900, but I prefer the over all sound of the Array to the K2 S9800, though it's hard not to be impressed with the overall sheer strength of the K2.

    It will be interesting to see how your appreciation changes as your ears and listening habits get accustomed to your wonderful 1400 Arrays. James Tanner seemed to go through an evolution of his own as he gained experience with them.
    Out.

  12. #27
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    I haven't heard the K2 S9900, but I prefer the over all sound of the Array to the K2 S9800, though it's hard not to be impressed with the overall sheer strength of the K2.
    Yeah, the S9800 didn't add up to the sum of its parts. The S9900 does though.

    The Arrays are super tough to beat. I really need to get four Synthesis 8's before they "go foreign". After June of this year JBL ceases to be a viable brand for me personally. It's been a great 35 year run though!

  13. #28
    Senior Member timc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    953
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    Yeah, the S9800 didn't add up to the sum of its parts.

    Awww...Come on. You're almost making me cry.............



    -Tim
    2213 + 2435HPL w/aquaplas + H9800 (Matsj edition)

  14. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Congratulations Tom on getting your Arrays .

    Quote Originally Posted by tom
    First impressions, with MY room, as is: They are waayy different than the S/2600's. The sweet spot with these is straight on, the S/2600 are everywhere....
    - Have you played with various angles of toe-in ?
    - Dr. Geddes recommends as much as 45 degrees for his Summas .

    Quote Originally Posted by tom
    The bass is a lot bigger, midrange is superior, top end...well, with my Tannoy Supertweeter on the S/2600's, is up for futher listening before I will say anything more. The visual impression is stunning. They look great with my tiger wood flooring, non intrusive and really do look better in person.

    I have been listening to a number of new sacd & redbook cd's-all sounding different than the other JBL. The speakers are beautiful and sound as advertised. I think, as with the S/2600's, it will take a while to get use to the clarity of the midrange and deeper bass, albiet with a diifferent presentation of the music.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom
    Well it did not take me long to get accustomed to these. They are awesome. The musical term I would use right now is clarity. As people say when listening to a new speaker, I can hear significantly more detail and decay of the instruments is beautifully produced. When I read those statements I was skeptical, however, after a few hours with these babies I have a sense of what they are hearing and understand.

    I will post some pictures when I can get a camera-mine is with my wife in Florida. I am going to borrow one from my business partner.
    - I agree ,the usage of bigger diaphragms ( compression types ) can lead to greater resolution ( clarity ) once some of the (typical) horn issues have been addressed .


    I'm looking forwards to some photos .

    <> cheers

  15. #30
    Super Moderator jblnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Mass
    Posts
    900
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    I'm not there yet... but I am teetering on the fence and will possibly join that club.


    Widget
    Put me on that list too....



    jblnut

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for part number for Project Array 1400 horn assembly
    By TimG in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-23-2008, 08:37 PM
  2. Project 1400
    By Valentin in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-26-2003, 05:26 PM
  3. NEW: project 1400 jbl
    By herve M in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-02-2003, 11:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •