Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: coupling 4311's

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    5

    coupling 4311's

    Does any one have any experience coupling sets of 4311's? I am expanding my control room and I own 2 sets of 4311b's. I am wondering if any body has experimented with coupling these boxes...I am searching for larger monitors (4335) but this is becoming a tough find. so what I have is (4) 4311's

  2. #2
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Control room?

    Stacking?

    A bad idea. It's AXIOMATIC: multiple sources playing the same program concurrently in a single acoustic space interfere with each other in a complex manner dependent upon the differential distances to those sources.

    [Fun, but, well, uhmmm, ... dumb.... ]

  3. #3
    Senior Member SMKSoundPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,019
    I agree with Zilch. I had four 4311's in my living room stereo for a time, with them stacked 2 high. They didn't sound as good as just one single pair. Now, all four of them live in a bar playing dance videos and the juke box.

    For a control room, there are some other options that are not very costly.

    Good luck and welcome to the forum.

    Scotty.
    One step above: "Two Tin Cans and a String!"
    Longtime Alaskan Low-Fi Guy - E=MC² ±3db

  4. #4
    Senior Member demon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    vienna
    Posts
    404
    hello!

    if you have time to spend and if you are willing to try things out (=play around), you could build a two-way d'appo speaker:
    place a nice horn or waveguide on one 4311 (where you only use the woofer), then place the second 4311 on the horn (just the woofer, too).
    this could work if done right (details, details).

    dont know what you think of it, but it was the first thing that came into my mind.

    cheers
    mikey

    ps:
    larger monitors (4335
    you mean 4435? i own a pair, they are great!!
    I'm selling a pair of JBL 4435 in Vienna, Austria

  5. #5

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by demon View Post
    hello!

    if you have time to spend and if you are willing to try things out (=play around), you could build a two-way d'appo speaker:
    place a nice horn or waveguide on one 4311 (where you only use the woofer), then place the second 4311 on the horn (just the woofer, too).
    this could work if done right (details, details).

    dont know what you think of it, but it was the first thing that came into my mind.

    cheers
    mikey

    ps: you mean 4435? i own a pair, they are great!!
    oops, yes 4435....want to sell them?

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    Control room?

    Stacking?

    A bad idea. It's AXIOMATIC: multiple sources playing the same program concurrently in a single acoustic space interfere with each other in a complex manner dependent upon the differential distances to those sources.

    [Fun, but, well, uhmmm, ... dumb.... ]

    easy now......asking questions here....

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by SMKSoundPro View Post
    I agree with Zilch. I had four 4311's in my living room stereo for a time, with them stacked 2 high. They didn't sound as good as just one single pair. Now, all four of them live in a bar playing dance videos and the juke box.

    For a control room, there are some other options that are not very costly.

    Good luck and welcome to the forum.

    Scotty.
    thanks Scotty, I was afraid of that, have not had time to try yet so again thanks........and what a lucky bar!

  9. #9
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Quote Originally Posted by peter G. View Post
    easy now......asking questions here....
    To answer, then, "Yes," I've done it, measured it, posted the results, and briefly enjoyed the ensuing enhanced festival of phase interference.

    http://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio/handb...erference.html

    See 2: Demonstration of Principle here:

    http://www.jblpro.com/catalog/suppor...=231&doctype=3

  10. #10
    Senior Member SMKSoundPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,019
    Thanks Zilch for posting those two links. Very imformative!
    Scotty.
    One step above: "Two Tin Cans and a String!"
    Longtime Alaskan Low-Fi Guy - E=MC² ±3db

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    To answer, then, "Yes," I've done it, measured it, posted the results, and briefly enjoyed the ensuing enhanced festival of phase interference.

    http://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio/handb...erference.html

    See 2: Demonstration of Principle here:

    http://www.jblpro.com/catalog/suppor...=231&doctype=3

    Thank you for this responce, the links are helpfull.

  12. #12
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    To answer, then, "Yes," I've done it, measured it, posted the results, and briefly enjoyed the ensuing enhanced festival of phase interference.
    It's called comb filtering, and presents itself differently dependent upon where you are in the listening area, relative to boundary planes, etc. Trying to stack or array non-arrayable cabinets, while fun , typically yields audible flanging as you move through the sound field. That, btw, is the cheapest method I know of to check for comb filtering...




    This might be hard to see, but here is a good example, taken at a recent Smaart training, of some (bad) flanging produced by a poorly focussed system in a major hall in SoCal.
    • Y-axis = Time in ms
    • X-axis = ƒ in Hz
    • Intensity (gain) is color, in relative dB, with warmer = higher.
    The measurement mic was moved across the sound field, only one side of the PA was firing; comb filtering (flanging) from boundary reflections is represented by the sub-vertical bands of warm color in the MF to UHF ƒ range. Color (gain) range was optimized to enhance the visualization of the "effect".
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4311s trailer find
    By oldr&b in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-02-2009, 05:24 PM
  2. Amp for 4311's
    By nymo in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 08:20 AM
  3. What a Deal!! 4311's @ 10.00!!
    By lgvenable in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-08-2006, 11:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •