Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: using line level impedance transformer/balun?

  1. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    Electronic Vodoo products

    Quote Originally Posted by alessa View Post
    This is also my experience with my Tube preamp that has a impedance transformer, it sound way more lively and dynamic than the one without and i've grown quite found of it.
    That's why i'd really like to replicate this device.
    Transformers will not soften Your sound. They will produce distortions when overdriven but that would take away the freedom to adjust the volume for the right loudness.

    Look for products which do TSE (Tape Saturation Emulation) or products from www.soundperformancelab.de. They give You that Vodoo sound. Some of them use DSPs

    Ruediger

  2. #17
    Senior Member Beowulf57's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by alessa View Post
    This is also my experience with my Tube preamp that has a impedance transformer, it sound way more lively and dynamic than the one without and i've grown quite found of it.
    That's why i'd really like to replicate this device.
    Are these two tube preamps identical except that one uses an input transformer ( not a step-up transformer I assume: 1:1?) and the other does not? What are the input impedances of the two preamps? Just want to be sure we're talking about a transformer effect. Also, the output voltage capability of your source and the gain of the preamp will affect the "dynamics." Are the gains of the two preamps identical?

    We are getting a bit far from the forum's content area...

  3. #18
    Senior Member Eaulive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Back in Montreal
    Posts
    1,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Beowulf57 View Post
    We are getting a bit far from the forum's content area...
    This thread was in the wrong forum since the beginning anyways

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,162
    Back in the eighties, I remember Ed Meitner was advocating the use of transformers between pre and power amps. I think Museatex (where he worked in Montreal, at the time) even sold them for a while.

    Of course, this was well before balanced lines came into vogue in consumer systems. Not that the two things are related. Or maybe they are with regard to CMRR?

  5. #20
    Senior Member Eaulive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Back in Montreal
    Posts
    1,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Chas View Post
    Of course, this was well before balanced lines came into vogue in consumer systems. Not that the two things are related. Or maybe they are with regard to CMRR?
    I don't think transformers and CMRR are related in any way. A transformer can sometimes reduce noise due to its isolating properties but not because it provides any common mode rejection.

    CMR is provided by having signal or opposite polarities travel the same path through the same cable-interconnect-field of interference so the similarities of the noises picked up are easy to cancel at the receiving end. The path may or may not include transformers.

  6. #21
    Senior Member jcrobso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,099

    Balance lines in consumer gear???

    If you go back to the first post and go the link the unit has RCA jacks, not balanced!

  7. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    Input transformers are for a high CMMR

    Quote Originally Posted by Eaulive View Post
    I don't think transformers and CMRR are related in any way. A transformer can sometimes reduce noise due to its isolating properties but not because it provides any common mode rejection.

    CMR is provided by having signal or opposite polarities travel the same path through the same cable-interconnect-field of interference so the similarities of the noises picked up are easy to cancel at the receiving end. The path may or may not include transformers.
    The purpose of (input) transformers is a high CMRR, that's what they are good for. See the technical papers at Jensen transformers.

    Ruediger

  8. #23
    Senior Member jcrobso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,099

    Transformers can be both ways.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruediger View Post
    The purpose of (input) transformers is a high CMRR, that's what they are good for. See the technical papers at Jensen transformers.

    Ruediger
    They can be hooked up balanced or unbalanced, CMRR only happens in the balanced configuration.

    I find it interesting, one of the goals over the years in amp design to get the "straight wire with gain" was to eliminate transformers from the signal path.
    I have a mixer board at the station that is around 20 years old it has transformers on the inputs and outputs to keep things balanced.
    I also have a new state of the art computerized DSP digital mixing board the has balanced ins and outs, no transformers! This board sounds great, cost $50,000 so it should.
    My take on transformers is that if you NEED them use them.

  9. #24
    Senior Member Eaulive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Back in Montreal
    Posts
    1,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruediger View Post
    The purpose of (input) transformers is a high CMRR, that's what they are good for. See the technical papers at Jensen transformers.

    Ruediger
    Here we go again.

    No, input transformers have no influence on CMRR. Common mode rejection is made possible by the transmission line configuration, the processing at the receiving end may or may not be a transformer.
    Modern equipment have a very high CMRR and do not use transformers.

    If you use standard unbalanced RCA cable, your equipment's input stage can have the highest CMMR and all the transformers in the world, no common mode rejection will occur.

    I suggest you read too

  10. #25
    Senior Member Eaulive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Back in Montreal
    Posts
    1,289
    Quote Originally Posted by jcrobso View Post
    They can be hooked up balanced or unbalanced, CMRR only happens in the balanced configuration.
    Exactly, assuming the line is balanced as well of course.

  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    Silly

    Quote Originally Posted by Eaulive View Post
    Here we go again.

    No, input transformers have no influence on CMRR. Common mode rejection is made possible by the transmission line configuration, the processing at the receiving end may or may not be a transformer.
    Modern equipment have a very high CMRR and do not use transformers.

    If you use standard unbalanced RCA cable, your equipment's input stage can have the highest CMMR and all the transformers in the world, no common mode rejection will occur.

    I suggest you read too
    This gets silly.

    http://www.jensen-transformers.com/an/ingenaes.pdf

    http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampin...d/balanced.htm

    In the latter paper look for "impedance balanced output".

    Ruediger

  12. #27
    Senior Member Eaulive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Back in Montreal
    Posts
    1,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruediger View Post
    This gets silly.

    http://www.jensen-transformers.com/an/ingenaes.pdf

    http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampin...d/balanced.htm

    In the latter paper look for "impedance balanced output".

    Ruediger
    So, where did I say this was not true?
    I agree that english is not my mother tongue but still...

  13. #28
    Junior Member alessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    7
    Cool, i opened the tube preamp that sounded good, and got the transformer spec:
    it's a OEP A262CAN SCRN (screening can)
    http://www.canford.co.uk/ProductResources/ig/2739.pdf
    I can't really understand what it does..
    but as it is cheap, maybe it's worth a buy to test it with power amps, or other preamps..?
    Got tubes?...then it's all good!

  14. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    What kind of connector?

    Quote Originally Posted by alessa View Post
    Cool, i opened the tube preamp that sounded good, and got the transformer spec:
    it's a OEP A262CAN SCRN (screening can)
    http://www.canford.co.uk/ProductResources/ig/2739.pdf
    I can't really understand what it does..
    but as it is cheap, maybe it's worth a buy to test it with power amps, or other preamps..?
    What kind of input connector does the preamp have? What do You connect to it and how is that wired?

    Ruediger

  15. #30
    Junior Member alessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruediger View Post
    What kind of input connector does the preamp have? What do You connect to it and how is that wired?

    Ruediger
    It's got XLR input, i connect the balanced output of my Soundcard RME fireface 800, it is wired in balanced stereo jack to XLR..
    Got tubes?...then it's all good!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JBL Control 1 summertime project surround array and more!
    By JBL 4645 in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 12:29 AM
  2. Any reason I can't use 14ga for transmission of line level signals???
    By Tweak48 in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-28-2008, 05:00 PM
  3. JBL Control 1E
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-28-2007, 06:07 AM
  4. passive line level 500 Hz cross over..
    By Harkness in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-03-2007, 05:08 PM
  5. Subsonic Line level filter
    By duaneage in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-19-2005, 08:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •