Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: how to improve my sytem

  1. #1
    Klaus
    Guest

    how to improve my sytem

    Hey everybody

    My cabinets are about 20 years old and i would like to start a new DIY-project.

    My set up:
    2235 H
    2118 J
    2404 H
    Amcron 1201

    They sound loud and powerfull but i would like more low end and more hifisound. Should i go with two 2235 H per new cabinet and replace the 2118 J or the 2404 H and biamp them ?

    Any idea?
    Thanks for your help
    Regards

    Klaus
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Alex Lancaster
    Guest

    Smile

    Is the picture upside down?, if not, put the woofers on the bottom.

  3. #3
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Hey, Klaus...

    Great idea to put this to the Forum!

    Alex is right - you should get better imaging with the HF closer to ear-level. That will bring more HiFi sound.

    What is the interior dimension of that cabinet (less the interior volume of the 2118 subenclosure)?

    What is the port tuning?

    What network are you using?
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  4. #4
    Klaus
    Guest
    Originally posted by boputnam
    Hey, Klaus...

    Great idea to put this to the Forum!

    Alex is right - you should get better imaging with the HF closer to ear-level. That will bring more HiFi sound.

    What is the interior dimension of that cabinet (less the interior volume of the 2118 subenclosure)?

    What is the port tuning?

    What network are you using?

    The interior volume is 5,3 cf. Subenclosure 0,5 cf
    The port : 3,94 X 3,94 X 5,51
    The network is DIY. Unfortunately i do not know much about it.
    Thanks
    Klaus

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Klaus,

    Sounds like you have a well engineered system, I recall kits marketed by Goldsound in the USA using similar components.

    You could try bi amping the system after the 2118 crossover point to extend the performance or better capacitors in the passive crossover.

    Alternatively, if you were to lay the system on its side with some low profile stands you could add a mid range horn on top like a 2397 (see the Library for alternatives) between 1200 - 8000 hertz and upgrade the crossover network.

    This would sharpen up the clarity of the system and make it more of the classic 43xx vintage.

    Another idea is to replace the 2404 with the 2344A/2426 driver, again crossing over around 1000-1200 hertz, the 2344a has found favour among our most senior members.

    If you check out the Widgets 4355 thread he has the horn resting in the top of the enclosure.

    I expect you would find this an advantagous way to start a new diy project with your existing system.

    Ian

  6. #6
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Originally posted by Ian Mackenzie
    ...I recall kits marketed by Goldsound in the USA using similar components.
    Well done, Aussie!!

    Gold Sound Kit 11

    Notice they cross at 300Hz and 5,000Hz...

    I'd say you're on to something, Klauss. Notice the orientation of the cabinet, and the "reviews"...

    Gold Sound Link
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  7. #7
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,207
    Hello Klaus

    That's a nice set up. Should kick. I would take a look at the Gold kit posted, reorient the drivers into an offset vetical array and see what's up with the crossover and tunning on the box. You have dimensions and depth on the port so we can get an idea where the box is tunned??

    Rob

  8. #8
    Klaus
    Guest
    Originally posted by Robh3606
    Hello Klaus

    That's a nice set up. Should kick. I would take a look at the Gold kit posted, reorient the drivers into an offset vetical array and see what's up with the crossover and tunning on the box. You have dimensions and depth on the port so we can get an idea where the box is tunned??

    Rob
    Thank you all for your help.

    Interior volume is 5,3 cf. Subenclosure 0,5 cf
    The ports : 3,94 X 3,94 X 5,51
    What about two 2235 H per cabinet?

    Regards Klaus

  9. #9
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Hi Klaus!

    This is what I got in BB6. Looks good!

    For me this sounds like a xover Prob.

    Could you show us a pic of the xover?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #10
    Klaus
    Guest
    Originally posted by Guido
    Hi Klaus!

    This is what I got in BB6. Looks good!

    For me this sounds like a xover Prob.

    Could you show us a pic of the xover?
    Hey Guido

    The pic from the xover comes soon. I have to open the cabinet.

    Klaus

  11. #11
    Klaus
    Guest
    Originally posted by Klaus
    Hey Guido

    The pic from the xover comes soon. I have to open the cabinet.

    Klaus
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  12. #12
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    Klaus' beta

    Originally posted by Robh3606
    You have dimensions and depth on the port so we can get an idea where the box is tuned??
    Here's what my run at BBPro tells me - Fb is 29.6Hz.

    I've assumed:

    Net volume = 4.8ft3 (net of sub-enclosure)
    Damping = "Typical" (cabinet walls, none on baffle)
    QL = 7
    QLv is default (not specified)
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  13. #13
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    Klas' beta, more...

    Venting:
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  14. #14
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Originally posted by Guido
    This is what I got in BB6. Looks good!
    Hey, Guido...

    What Fb did your run yield...?
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    The crossover looks okay for a production unit.

    The 2nd crossover point is a stretch for both the midrange and tweeter, this is where you can amend the design by adding a horn and driver.

    The guys can help you out with the re work on the crossover.

    If you seriously wont to play with different kinds of drivers consider an electronic crossover unit. Robs system is setup like this, ask him for details. You could then use an upper midrang dome like the 093 and a dome tweeter like the 035/055/066...very hifi.... without having to consider matching driver sensitivity as you do in a passive crossover.

    The system will give differing bass response pending position in the room as configured, better to have lesser bass than boom.

    Where are your Boxes located? The repositioning the boxes.
    What sort of amplifier are you using?

    The thing about JBL is you can always add a little bass in with an Equaliser or tone controls to extend the bottom end.

    Ian

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •