Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: s1s-ex vs 4645c

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    leif
    Guest

    s1s-ex vs 4645c

    Anyone have any opinions about these two subs?
    They both use the 2442H, and both enclosures are 225 liters.
    The price here is Norway is 3 times as high on the s1s-ex as the 4645H.
    Are they actually equal, exept for the finish? (and that one have 3 ports, while the other has 1)?

    Leif

  2. #2
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    Other than cosmetics...

    I would use the cheaper one myself

    Regards, Ron
    JBL Pro for home use!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    This was discussed elswhere.
    The 2 units are the same (except design).
    The one is professional and therefore has a reasonable price, the other is synthesis and therefore has a not reasonable price.

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    The S1S and 4645 are functionally equivalent - the ubiquitous 8 cubic foot volume tuned to 25 Hz first started way back when with the B460.

    There are some S1S's and 4645's out there in the field with 30 Hz tuning frequencies instead of the 25 Hz tuning frequency. They usually use the older 2245H instead of the newer 2242H. At one point JBL was trying to keep 2245H's from blowing up left and right so they changed the tuning frequency upwards 5 Hz. When the monster 2242H became available they went back to the 25 Hz tuning frequency.

    The S1S-EX uses the 2242H in a 6.5 cubic foot volume tuned to 25 Hz using three 4" flared tubes.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Valentin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    725
    3 times for the same performance

    the 4645c is a bit larger in volume but it si slimmer

    4645c H1010 x W67.4 x D45 = 225 liter (internal)
    S1S ex H87.6 x W53.3 x D55.9 = 185 liter (internal)

    it an easy decision here

    but then why the smaller but deeper enclosure

    for installation in rooms deeper has more problems than slimmer designs

    4313b Is there some adjustment done too the volume too work better in small rooms?

    4645c was intended for large spaces

    there must be a way to the smaller but not so practical enclosure

  6. #6
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    ping: 4313B

    I too am interested if a smaller size cabinet(but tuned higher) that could be used in a smaller room.

    The only difference for me is not needing response below 35hz as my room nodes go crazy below that. So the tuning for my scenario would be higher than most folks need for a larger room!

    Regards, Ron



    Quote Originally Posted by Valentin View Post

    4313b Is there some adjustment done too the volume too work better in small rooms?

    4645c was intended for large spaces

    there must be a way to the smaller but not so practical enclosure
    JBL Pro for home use!

  7. #7
    JBL 4645
    Guest
    As for the ports on sevreal of the JBL 46 sub bass model range some have two ports like on the JBL 4645B they bend inwarads at 45 degee angle. The sub has nice deep low end shake n' feel.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Valentin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    725

    Wink

    thanks for your coments

    The 1500 Array would be my choice if cost were no object
    mine too (design i like more the hb5000)but at the moment cost is factor
    especially if you think in buying 2 units for better in room bass

    but i think my 2 b460 (2242) clones in my specialized music room should do extremely well


    I've been told that JBL has since come up with a new eighteen that behaves more like the venerable 2245H. I can't remember the model number right now.
    maybe in the near future

  9. #9
    JBL 4645
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Valentin View Post
    thanks for your coments



    mine too (design i like more the hb5000)but at the moment cost is factor
    especially if you think in buying 2 units for better in room bass

    but i think my 2 b460 (2242) clones in my specialized music room should do extremely well



    maybe in the near future
    Maybe stereo sub bass!

  10. #10
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Valentin View Post
    but i think my 2 b460 (2242) clones in my specialized music room should do extremely well
    No doubt

    The characteristic that jumped out at me when I heard my first pair of 2242H's was how incredibly clean they sounded.

  11. #11
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    I 2nd that comment!

    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    The characteristic that jumped out at me when I heard my first pair of 2242H's was how incredibly clean they sounded.

    When I had a pair of 2242H in 9 cu ft cabs in my living room I was using a single PE sub plate amp (250 watts) and never came close to tapping the wattage.

    My WT2 measured approx -3db/35hz, but pipe organ music never missed a note!!!


    In my 12' x 16' room I feared structural damage if I continued to run them on a regular basis.

    I now have a pair of 2245 cores that were reconed to 2240H's and plan to try them out in 6 cu ft box sealed run off a McIntosh MC-240 and using a Reckhorn B1 to control the bottom end. It has a variable HI/LO pass filters and a variable EQ.

    I'm just researching the resistor network to pad down my main amps speaker output and reduce it to line level for input to the B-1. I don't have a pre out/pwr in on my integrated 300B amp. Also, the B-1 has a input impedance of only 10K ohms which would kill a tube preamp looking for a MUCH higher input impedance.

    I look for room gain to fill in the rest.

    That project will be a few months down the road as my throat surgery next Monday is center stage for attention right now.

    Regards, Ron
    JBL Pro for home use!

  12. #12
    Senior Member Doc Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Southern, California, USA
    Posts
    1,371
    Hey, Ron,

    Best of luck in your upcoming surgery, Sir! Get well soon, so you can continue singing the praises of the things we all love: JBL goodies!! I still have not yet played around, too much, with my 4645 cab & 2242H woofer. I got sidetracked with a horrible hum in the system, and have yet to track down the source, though as Bo so wisely suggested, it's probably my H/K preamp. Again, please keep us posted as to your recovery after the surgery, and we'll keep you in our prayers and thoughts. Take care, and God Bless!

    Every Good Wish,
    Doc
    The only thing that can never be taken away from you, is your honor. Cherish it, in yourself, and in others.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. sub 4645c
    By faulken in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 12-24-2013, 04:30 PM
  2. S1S vs S1S-EX
    By Loffen in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-19-2008, 05:16 AM
  3. 4645C recommended EQ??
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-16-2008, 10:25 AM
  4. JBLpro 4645C sub?
    By porsche911 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-04-2006, 06:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •