Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: L-100A vs L-166

  1. #1
    Junior Member Gregory Earl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9

    Question L-100A vs L-166

    Hello all. My first post here.

    I've spent a lot of time listening to the L-166's at a friends house for many years. Great speaker IMO. I've heard many good things about the L-100. A matter of fact I've read so many good things about it that I just bought a pair. L-100A's to be exact.

    My question is this.

    What will I hear different from the 100's compared to what I've been hearing from the 166's over the years?

  2. #2
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregory Earl View Post
    What will I hear different from the 100's compared to what I've been hearing from the 166's over the years?
    You tell us what you hear.

  3. #3
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregory Earl View Post
    What will I hear different from the 100's compared to what I've been hearing from the 166's over the years?
    boomey bass ?

    I have both, prefer the L166
    and generally the L100's sell for MORE.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  4. #4
    Senior Member SMKSoundPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,019
    Weird spike at around 8K with nothing on upto 20k.

    I have had both. 166 Horizon is much more musical IMHO.
    One step above: "Two Tin Cans and a String!"
    Longtime Alaskan Low-Fi Guy - E=MC² ±3db

  5. #5
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregory Earl View Post
    Hello all. My first post here.
    Welcome to the Forum!

    Many of us trash the L100s and others find them to be near perfection. I wouldn't sweat it.

    I own a pair and do enjoy them in a mid to near field listening situation at ear height up off the floor. In larger rooms with them over 6-10 feet away I don't much care for them. Oddly, they were originally designed as a mid to near field monitor.

    I would agree with the couple of other posters here that the L166 is a more accurate and musical loudspeaker... and many newer JBLs are even better still. Do not assume just because a speaker is popular or expensive that it will please you more however.


    Widget

  6. #6
    RIP 2013 Rolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Skien, Norway
    Posts
    2,298
    I love the L-100. Have heard the 166, but the "unnatural" sound of the L100 is my choice.

  7. #7
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    L100: Fake, but also FUN!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042
    L100 is a near-perfect small room (think: dorm room) speaker, if, as Widget recommends, you get them up off the floor, and if you want vintage JBL early 70s sound. Bigger room? Not so good.

    The L166 is a better speaker in most respects, but I don't really like it as much. Perhaps it's important to disclose the fact that my first pair of JBLs ever was a brand new set of L100 Century speakers (with the in line drivers) and I still have them to this day.
    Out.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Fangio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    789
    How about performing an A/B at your friends place.

    I did this once with my Horizons (vs. L100). Blind test or not, IMO the result was predictable – he added L166's to his collection.

  10. #10
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Fangio View Post
    How about performing an A/B at your friends place.
    Yeah, asking a bunch of people what they think beforehand is probably a good way to make sure one has preconceptions.

  11. #11
    hosee
    Guest
    I remember that the L-100 was the standard of reference which other similar sized speakers were compared in publications at the time (i.e. Stereo Review, etc). The writers felt that the L-100 was very accurate speaker.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Fred Sanford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by hosee View Post
    I remember that the L-100 was the standard of reference which other similar sized speakers were compared in publications at the time (i.e. Stereo Review, etc). The writers felt that the L-100 was very accurate speaker.
    That's true. And then, science & technology marched on, and other speakers came out- lots of 'em.

    I honestly keep trying to like my L100s, and...I keep trying. They're OK. I think others are better.

    je

  13. #13
    Senior Member Akira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    327
    I really like the inline early L100's. I think that one reason they sound so good on 70's rock is a lot of material was mixed on 4310's. There are certain albums that the box seems to be uniquely made for...Carly Simon's 'No Secrets' and 'Who's Next' 'Yellow Brick Road'
    Off the floor they used the big boys, but in a down mix near fields were standard practice even back then and 4310's ruled the day.

  14. #14
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Akira View Post
    I think that one reason they sound so good on 70's rock is a lot of material was mixed on 4310's.
    BINGO! You win!

  15. #15
    Junior Member Gregory Earl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by hosee View Post
    I remember that the L-100 was the standard of reference which other similar sized speakers were compared in publications at the time (i.e. Stereo Review, etc). The writers felt that the L-100 was very accurate speaker.

    Quote Originally Posted by Akira View Post
    I really like the inline early L100's. I think that one reason they sound so good on 70's rock is a lot of material was mixed on 4310's. There are certain albums that the box seems to be uniquely made for...Carly Simon's 'No Secrets' and 'Who's Next' 'Yellow Brick Road'
    Off the floor they used the big boys, but in a down mix near fields were standard practice even back then and 4310's ruled the day.
    That's exactly the reason I want to have these speakers in my repertoire. And since I'm a child of the 70's you can see what I'm going for here.
    I can totally see the whole "small room is better opinion" with these speakers also.

    Thanks for the replies and all opinions gentlemen. I'll post on what I hear a few days from now after I've received them and have spent some quality time getting to know them.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 100A Bass Energizer
    By dbALE in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-02-2008, 01:19 PM
  2. JBL 166?
    By seven in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-10-2007, 05:41 AM
  3. L 166 grills repair (glue and shape)
    By clh1997 in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-08-2006, 02:24 PM
  4. Lx 166
    By herve M in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-06-2004, 12:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •