Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Diaphragms: better new or replaced? Why?

  1. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bartlett, Illinois
    Posts
    180
    Sure would of been helpful if JBL had put their logo on the diaphragms, or their part number. Not always possible of course, but on compression driver diaphragms, the plastic mounting ring sure could have something put on it. I don't have much experience with JBL compression drivers and their diaphragms, having only pairs of 2420s, 2425s, 2402s and 2405s. I think the 2402 had a number on the edge of the diaphragm, and I think my 2420s (labeled LE85) were redone, they are missing the wax seals, and I've never opened the 2425. So JBL never marked their compression driver diaphragms at all? Seems kinda odd...

  2. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Christchurch, NZ
    Posts
    1,400
    It would be far to easy for a JBL logo to appear on the diaphragms. I have never seen an ID on the cone kits either.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 288 Diaphragms and DC resistance.
    By gek in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-03-2007, 06:28 AM
  2. 4" diaphragms
    By aust-ted in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-22-2005, 08:44 PM
  3. Difference between JBL coated diaphragms
    By Niklas Nord in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-26-2004, 01:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •