Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Power handling on 4300's, 4400's, and L Series

  1. #1
    Senior Member shaansloan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    ABQ NM
    Posts
    331

    Power handling on 4300's, 4400's, and L Series

    So why is it that the 4300 series and 4400 series systems have such low power handling? And is it really true?

    4311 - 75 watts RMS
    4313B - 50 watts RMS
    4333A - 75 watts RMS
    4343B - 75 watts RMS
    4410 - 125 watts RMS
    4412 - 150 watts RMS

    L96 - 50 watts RMS
    L112 - 300 watts RMS

    Thanks for your insight

    Shaan

  2. #2
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Have to read the fine print, in how "power handling" was defined...
    Materials and adhesives improved, so one might expect newer, comparable
    systems to handle more power, but "continuous sine wave" and
    "music program" power handling (let alone "recommended amplifier power")
    are all convenient ways for consumers to compare systems in ways that they
    are typically used... at least it would be convenient if all manufacturers chose
    the same "spec" or definition to adhere to in testing/reporting.

    Frankly, I personally think it's one of the less useful performance metrics (for
    home use).

  3. #3
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Low power handling?? In actual use many of these systems will get uncomfortably loud before you are even close to those RMS ratings. Some of them can literally hurt you, permanent hearing damage, and go on playing all day long at those levels, especially the larger systems. Don't let those seemingly low ratings fool you. They are conseratively rated and can handle peak levels well about the stated RMS levels.

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  4. #4
    RIP 2013 Rolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Skien, Norway
    Posts
    2,298
    I have used up to a 1000W/Ch - and I mean really W - playing so loud you could not be in the room. (For testing) NO problem. Don't worry if the sound is clean. eee That if your ears are "clean".

    Quote Originally Posted by shaansloan View Post
    So why is it that the 4300 series and 4400 series systems have such low power handling? And is it really true?

    4311 - 75 watts RMS
    4313B - 50 watts RMS
    4333A - 75 watts RMS
    4343B - 75 watts RMS
    4410 - 125 watts RMS
    4412 - 150 watts RMS

    L96 - 50 watts RMS
    L112 - 300 watts RMS

    Thanks for your insight

    Shaan

  5. #5
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,736
    Your ears will hurt and you will hear "distress" from the speakers before they get destroyed. If you keep playing them under those conditions you are abusing the speakers and could very well blow them.

    Manufacturers have tried different methods to make a recommendation on amplifier power and at the same time not expose themselves to complaints, warranty work and legal claims from ham fisted bozos.

    Most recent JBL specs (LSR32, for example) give a number for how much the speaker will sustain more or less constantly and another number for maximum size of recommended amplifier. The latter is always higher. The higher-power amplifier will deliver the instantaneous peaks the speakers can withstand and the dynamics of the music require, but the speaker cannot endure being driven with that amplifier flat out and driving the speaker into gross distortion. JBL speakers are designed to reproduce those peaks, and so you are missing some of the JBL value by using a small amplifier that cannot power them, but you have to be able to discern the differences in these ideas.

    The classic 604-8G, for example, is a very efficient speaker and will play your music with a small amp for almost all uses, but driven with 200 watts of clean power it really opens up and does a different thing. Its power rating was 50 watts "program", whatever that means.

    For a final example, Greg Timbers and Co. in their 80's article on the 380 and 460 subwoofers gave the power rating but added that with more power they sounded better and admitted that they had used up to 2400 watts. He also added that if you use that much power you are on your own.

    You need to be able to be guided by your hearing. If the speaker is sounding distressed, you need to turn it down. If your use of the speakers is contradicted by common sense you are headed for trouble. A few years ago someone came on the forums to ask if we could help him understand why L100's were not standing up to being used as SR for his son's band! A member recently posted about the possibility of using 4333's for DJ work. I would never do that. It is a monitor, not a sound reinforcement speaker, and such use would be abuse, especially given that in DJ and SR contexts the culture often leads to cranking it up until something gives.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •