Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 2397's plus mid's

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667

    2397's plus mid's

    Hi all,
    I just got to wondering that (as far as I know) the 2397 /244* is a well regarded combo and yet never made it into a big 4*** series monitor.
    My question is what would be a logical 'upgrade' to my early Westy clones?
    Searching the forum does tend to favour the addition of a cone midrange to make them 4 ways I'm just wondering if the cone mid plus the 2397 opens a can of worms in terms of baffle placement, integration of drivers etc.I'm reasonably happy with them at the moment but am sure some mid help could be worth it but would it mean having to forgo that lovely horn?
    Cheers
    Cooky

  2. #2
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,744
    Quote Originally Posted by cooky1257 View Post
    I'm reasonably happy with them at the moment but am sure some mid help could be worth it but would it mean having to forgo that lovely horn?
    What's wrong with using a nice wood diffraction horn and a midbass?


    Widget
    .
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    Hello Widget,
    Wonderful, I know, I know but though unable to find it, I remember all your permutations of baffle layouts without entirely nailing it(as I recall)to your satisfaction.
    I can just manage the 3m distance needed for good integration.
    Also I really can't go any larger/wider-not in our average uk listening rooms anyway so 10" mids would be the max I can go with-any suggestions?.
    Cooky

  4. #4
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    If you are after better low mids why not convert your 2235s to 2234s and use a 2.5 way approach like the 4435 and everest 2 do?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    If you are after better low mids why not convert your 2235s to 2234s and use a 2.5 way approach like the 4435 and everest 2 do?
    Thanks for the suggestion-it's all up for grabs at the minute tho' I've only just re-coned the 2231's to 2235's so scalpel time doesn't exactly thrill me;-)
    It's not the amount of low mid but the quality which is actually ok but having read glowing reports of the benefits of JBL 12"/10' mids and a higher xover for the 2441's it gets me wondering.
    Cooky

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Hi

    Quote Originally Posted by cooky1257
    Wonderful, I know, I know but though unable to find it, I remember all your ( Widgets' ) permutations of baffle layouts without entirely nailing it(as I recall)to your satisfaction.
    As I remember that period ( winter/spring 2004 ), it was a 12" ( 2202h ) that Widget struggled to integrate ( without finding sonic satisfaction ) .

    JBLs' 10" mids have a better track record at integrating ( as observed, strictly from the number of permutations & combinations found in the 434x series ) .

    <>

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JBL's BEST Mids?? Any Opinions?
    By Nightbrace in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 04-15-2006, 01:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •