I read great things about both...the ti's obviously having the advantage of being much newer....which do you prefer the sound from?
I read great things about both...the ti's obviously having the advantage of being much newer....which do you prefer the sound from?
True...but the designer of the Corvette prefers the 2008, yet I bet popular opinion is the 1967 is more fun.
....Why are the 4343's 3 times as expensive?
I'm quite convinced that Greg never touched the 4343. At least that is what he states every time the topic comes up. He has never been able to find the EDS for it to add to the website either.On the other hand Greg Timbers was the juice for both the 4343 and L250ti.
The Pro systems from the same era as the L250 and 250Ti would be Greg's 4345 and 4355 (Greg didn't do the 4344.)
Greg's comments on both the 250Ti and the 4345 can be found on this website.
here it is: http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...5&postcount=27
That would be very interesting to know Greg's opinion on a comparison between the 4345 and 4355, as he did with the 4315/XPL200 and 4345/250Ti !
I prefer the 4343s but that's a matter of taste. Your never going to know unles you hear the 2 yourself.
I got the 250TI's home from San Mateo yesterday...haven't hooked them up yet but they sure look nice!
Nice! You won't be disappointed with the 250's. They've got more than enough guts to go beyond what you'd need. The horn loaded systems like the L-300's (I haven't heard the 4343, but I have the home version of the 4333) are more dB sensitive and get louder sooner, but in a side-by-side comparison, the 250's hit the mark as well. They just needed to be fed more power.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)