Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: Best 15 inch JBL Subwoofer?

  1. #16
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,734
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    As an aside - we used to use the 2235H in large sixth order vented alignments way back when there wasn't a whole lot of VLF content on the media available at the time. They were "good" down to 20 Hz with the bump filter set at 20 Hz in the old 5234A. Modern media obsoletes such systems unless the power input is carefully monitored and controlled.
    That is exactly what I was talking about. Thanks for the thorough posts explaining where I was going with this.

    If you watch an action movie at the DTS reference level of 105dB, there are plenty of films that will also cause the 2235Hs in a 5 cu ft enclosure tuned to ~30Hz to slap those mass rings silly. You can filter your signal below 30Hz, but comparing that to a Sub1500 that pressurizes the room to 20Hz and below, you are really missing something.


    Widget

  2. #17
    Senior Member stevem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    How low will you be running your 1401Nd drivers?Widget
    I'm using an 80 Hz crossover at 48 db/octave. I have the lows cut below 15 Hz at 12 db/octave. I use a BSS Omnidrive 366T for all of my crossovers, so I can (and do) use some judicious response tailoring and level matching. Power is from a Bryston 4BST (250 w/ch) amp. Would I gain anything with the SMS-!?

  3. #18
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,734
    Quote Originally Posted by stevem View Post
    I use a BSS Omnidrive 366T for all of my crossovers...Power is from a Bryston 4BST (250 w/ch) amp. Would I gain anything with the SMS-!?
    That's a nice amp. You would gain from getting a better crossover and using the SMS-1 as an EQ only, I don't like it's DSP clouding the response above the subwoofer.

    If you are happy with that BSS DSP you would only gain 8 additional parametric control points and the rather excellent bass interpretation/correction that the SMS-1 offers. I can match what the SMS-1 does using CLIO and DEQX, but it isn't easy. The SMS-1 is easy and sounds really good too.

    You can pick it up brand new on eBay from dealers selling it just above cost for around $500... quite a bargain, I'd say


    Widget

  4. #19
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,200
    If you watch an action movie at the DTS reference level of 105dB, there are plenty of films that will also cause the 2235Hs in a 5 cu ft enclosure tuned to ~30Hz to slap those mass rings silly.
    Hello Widget

    I am not questioning the superiority of the other drivers or that they will go lower. That's a given for obvious reasons. I just don't get the slapping mass rings. With both 4344 in 5 cubic ft and now a B380 I have yet to ring the bell using 2235's. I have been able to get 121A to clank but only in a sealed box at high SPL levels.

    That 105dB is a peak level that should be no sweat over the designed bandwidth for a B380. At least in a typical sized room.

    Anyone else slapping around the mass rings and if so on what DVD's??

    Be nice to have a list to torture test a system.

    Rob

  5. #20
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Anyone else slapping around the mass rings and if so on what DVD's??
    Quite common and it started when CD's hit the market. It was a source of warranty repair.
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    With both 4344 in 5 cubic ft
    Doesn't really count.
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    and now a B380 I have yet to ring the bell using 2235's.
    Shouldn't happen very often in the B380 with the BX63 due to the bump filter.
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    I have been able to get 121A to clank but only in a sealed box at high SPL levels.
    A 20 Hz filter should take care of that. They took a real beating when CD's first came out.

  6. #21
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    That 105dB is a peak level that should be no sweat over the designed bandwidth for a B380. At least in a typical sized room.

    Anyone else slapping around the mass rings and if so on what DVD's??

    Be nice to have a list to torture test a system.

    Rob
    Chase down a copy of the 2005 Ewan McGregor flick "Stay" - there is a scene in the doctor's office where he smacks a thick glass window wall and we thought for sure our picture window had cracked. I figured afterwards it HAD to be a mass ring smacking bottom (B-380 fed by bridged Citation 22)
    Kind of a Vanilla Sky movie otherwise ...
    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  7. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Hello Widget

    I am not questioning the superiority of the other drivers or that they will go lower. That's a given for obvious reasons. I just don't get the slapping mass rings. With both 4344 in 5 cubic ft and now a B380 I have yet to ring the bell using 2235's. I have been able to get 121A to clank but only in a sealed box at high SPL levels.

    That 105dB is a peak level that should be no sweat over the designed bandwidth for a B380. At least in a typical sized room.

    Anyone else slapping around the mass rings and if so on what DVD's??

    Be nice to have a list to torture test a system.

    Rob

    I've "slapped" the mass controlling ring on my 2235 several times when I use this speaker as a sub in parallel with my W15GTI. (Always a quick reach for the volume control!) Longer ports, or sealing one of the two ports, reduced the excursion and 2235 slapping.

    I also used to bottom out the 130As when used as subs (with lots of bottom end eq).

    I've never slapped anything with the W15GTI, but the architecture of the speaker probably makes this a near impossibility.

    When the W15GTI starts to "overexcursion," the other voice coil comes into the opposing magnetic gap repelling the movement.

  8. #23
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    Best 15 inch JBL Subwoofer?

    W15GTi

    Quote Originally Posted by toddalin View Post
    I've never slapped anything with the W15GTI, but the architecture of the speaker probably makes this a near impossibility.
    Yep. It truly is the JBL 15-inch driver for the readership of this forum. Easily obtainable and easy to use. Plus it is nicely built. I can see why you are so one-note about it. The Harman website has the various documents with respect to how to use it so it is no mystery for anyone (I've posted those links numerous times and they should come up via the Search feature).

  9. #24
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,734
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    That 105dB is a peak level that should be no sweat over the designed bandwidth for a B380. At least in a typical sized room.
    The B380 without a proper high pass filter will have difficulty with many DVDs that have content below 30Hz at a 0dB level. The problem is that once you get below the frequency that any reflex box is tuned to, the woofer is unloaded and it will flail wildly if driven hard. Room size isn't much of an issue, it is a mostly a matter of frequency at anything above a few watts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Be nice to have a list to torture test a system.
    I realize that you don't run into this sort of thing because you primarily watch those fine Merchant Ivory films , but if you pop in a Terminator film, or The newish Transformers movie, or almost any contemporary action film, there will be some sound effects that are seriously low in frequency... the mid air collision in Fight Club even caused me to turn down the pair of ported Sub1500s I was running, though the USGS picked up the impact on their seismic gear.



    Widget

  10. #25
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,734
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    If one doesn't have the kind of funds required to run these modern subs one can go with something like the W15GTi mentioned by toddalin above. This driver has a higher Q and shouldn't require any EQ. It will dump a ton of bass tones into a room.
    True... if massive bass is the requirement that would be a solution, however for those interested in a more tuneful bass that is less "one note" sounding, I'd recommend the Sub1500/W1500H woofers. The 2245 is also quite good, though it's Xmax at sub musical frequencies can also become a factor. For music and lower powered HT applications the 2235H is also excellent.

    At the other end of the spectrum from the W15GTi in the 15" JBL woofer catalog is running dual 1500ALs. A pair of these with the SMS-1 will give you about the best bass on the planet in my opinion. For some reason, you really need a pair per side to reach the pinnacle of performance, though one per side is pretty neat too... either way, you need to actively or passively EQ them if you want to plumb the depths of deep bass. While these woofers have a level of finesse that few other woofers offer, they are also remarkably robust and take immense power with grace.


    Widget

  11. #26
    Senior Member timc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    953
    To bad they cost a ton too. I would love to get a pair for sub use.



    -Tim
    2213 + 2435HPL w/aquaplas + H9800 (Matsj edition)

  12. #27
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    True... if massive bass is the requirement that would be a solution
    Well, it keeps coming up over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over so it must be a requirement?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    I'd recommend the Sub1500/W1500H woofers.
    We've already done that numerous times but they are tough to get.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    The 2245 is also quite good, though it's Xmax at sub musical frequencies can also become a factor. For music and lower powered HT applications the 2235H is also excellent.
    Yep, I think we've posted that over a dozen times now.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    1500ALs. A pair of these with the SMS-1 will give you about the best bass on the planet in my opinion. For some reason, you really need a pair per side to reach the pinnacle of performance, though one per side is pretty neat too... either way, you need to actively or passively EQ them if you want to plumb the depths of deep bass. While these woofers have a level of finesse that few other woofers offer, they are also remarkably robust and take immense power with grace.
    Yep, the 1500AL actually responds surprisingly well to sub duty. It is available from Japan. Some may prefer the 1501AL with the higher impedance voice coils to run in pairs. They were designed to run in pairs. Other possibilities would be the 1500FE and the ME150H.

  13. #28
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,734
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    Well, it keeps coming up....

    We've already done that numerous times...

    Yep, I think we've posted that over a dozen times now...


    That's the problem with having an older forum... so many of these topics will be gone over and over again.

    BTW: What is the polarity of a pair of L100s and can I use a 16 ohm 2405 with an 8 ohm....


    Widget

  14. #29
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,548
    Maybe we need a sticky post for obtaining Massive Bassive?

    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  15. #30
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,734
    Quote Originally Posted by hjames View Post
    Maybe we need a sticky post for obtaining Massive Bassive?
    I'd rather see us promote quality.


    Widget

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Subwoofer JBL 4688
    By Lionel PAUTY in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-15-2003, 02:43 PM
  2. JBL Synthesis 1 Subwoofer
    By pfreak in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-09-2003, 01:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •