Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: XLR Cable Buyer's Guide?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    US
    Posts
    17

    XLR Cable Buyer's Guide?

    Hi guys,

    I'm almost ready to hook everything up in my system, but I'm having one heck of a time trying to decipher what characteristics of xlr cables are meaningful. I've only really been able to come to a consensus on cable shielding, the more the better.

    Does gauge matter for interconnects? Are they made of different materials and, if so, does it make a significant difference?

    I've also read that some cables are intentionally slightly capacitive in order to prevent high frequency roll-off?

    Thanks for all the assistance.
    David

  2. #2
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Quote Originally Posted by dlwearl View Post
    Does gauge matter for interconnects? Are they made of different materials and, if so, does it make a significant difference?
    I, and many/most here just use common commercial grade mic cables. However, you may need to drop Pin1 on the interconnects to minimize ground loops - do this at the load end.

    Quote Originally Posted by dlwearl View Post
    I've also read that some cables are intentionally slightly capacitive in order to prevent high frequency roll-off?
    Beyond my knowledge and experience.
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  3. #3
    Senior Member Baron030's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    431
    Originally posted by dlwearl:

    I've also read that some cables are intentionally slightly capacitive in order to prevent high frequency roll-off?
    Hi David,

    All cables have some capacitive reactance.
    And it is this capacitive reactance that actually causes high frequency roll-off.
    So, what you have read has got it all backwards.

    Depending on the thickness and the insulating materials used, a cable’s capacitive reactance will vary. The standard measurement for a cable’s capacitive reactance is in pico-farads (pf) per foot or in pico-farads per meter. (Pico = 1/1,000,000,000,000)
    So, a lower (pf) value per foot or meter is better.

    If you were running a high impedance signal over a very long distance, then differences in a cable’s capacitive reactance would be very significant. But, for short system “interconnect” cables, then a cable’s capacitive reactance is not going to be a significant issue in this case.

    And as far as wire gauge is concerned, I can see where a heavier gauge would hold up longer in an abusive “Pro-Sound” application. There are a lot more wire stands to break before a cable fails outright. But, for short system “interconnect” cables, it is not going to matter much.

    And you are absolutely right about cable shielding, more the definitely better.

    So, my advice would be to choose the cable that has the best shielding and the lowest capacitance per foot which is in your budgeted price range.

    And keep these “interconnect” cables as short in length as possible.
    Also, watch out for ground loops.

    Baron030

  4. #4
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    The better the shield..the better the cable.

    The bigger the conductor...in this case, 18-22 AWG depending on the type of wire...the better. If you use a "star-quad" config that has four 21-22 awg conductors paralled in pairs, the net result is 18-19 awg signal carrier conductor. Your cable should ideally be "invisible" to your system, and the more copper the better.

    If you want great cheap performance in an unbalanced interconnect, try RG-6 quadshield coax with compression fit RCA connectors. The only caveat with that is it's lack of flexibility.....but you get a solid 18 awg center conductor...and it's dirt cheap.
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  5. #5
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound View Post
    coax with compression fit RCA connectors. ..and it's dirt cheap.
    Please help, I have a language problem:
    "compression fit"?
    Does this imply industrial manufactured ? (Quetschverbindung?)
    And where it might be available?
    ____________
    Peter

  6. #6
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoerninger View Post
    Please help, I have a language problem:
    "compression fit"?
    Does this imply industrial manufactured ? (Quetschverbindung?)
    And where it might be available?
    ____________
    Peter
    Peter,

    Compression fit RCA connectors are now available much like compession fit weather tight F-connectors.

    It eliminates the need for using an F-to-RCA threaded adaptor.

    Google "compression RCA connector" and you'll find some info...in the US anyway.
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    182
    If you try RG-6 quadshield coax, go with the SOLID copper center conductor. Think: HD Satellite grade....Cheap RG-6 has a copper coated STEEL center conductor.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Baron030's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    431
    Edgewound’s advice about using RG-6 a quadshield coax video cable is a very sound one.
    In looking up the specs the on this stuff, it has only 16.2 pF/Ft.
    This is an extremely low value for just about any cable.
    It’s rated to have a nominal attenuation loss of only 0.35db/100 ft. @ 1MHz.
    Since, the audio spectrum is much lower then 1,000,000 Hz.
    Your actual signal losses should be lower.

  9. #9
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    Thanks for the affirmation, Baron030

    The stuff I have in the shop here is sweep tested to 2.2GHz.

    Is that enough bandwidth?

    I'm sure someone will have a problem with it, though....

    ....simply because it's not expensive enough....
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  10. #10
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound View Post
    I'm sure someone will have a problem with it, though....

    ....simply because it's not expensive enough....
    Na... Only because it's unbalanced...!

  11. #11
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    Quote Originally Posted by boputnam View Post
    Na... Only because it's unbalanced...!
    Well that is certainly true...and shame on me for veering OT.

    My main point was you needn't spend centibux nor kilobux to get great performance from a cable....especially for a few feet away in a home environment.

    Yeah Mogami, Canare, even Conquest star quad gets my vote for value balanced.
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  12. #12
    Senior Member just4kinks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    223
    If you're skilled with a soldering iron, you can make your own.

    I picked up some Mogami quad mic cable for (If I remember correctly) $.69 / foot:
    http://www.mogamicable.com/Bulk/micr.../quad_micr.htm

    And some Neutrik connectors for $2.50 each:
    http://www.neutrik.com/fl/en/audio/2...FX_detail.aspx

    You can make some great cables for pretty cheap. I got everything locally Guitar Center, but you might be able to order online cheaper.

    They're not easy to make though... if you don't have the right vice, clamps, and clips, the wires are real tough to hold in place while the solder hardens.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound View Post
    compession fit weather tight F-connectors.
    Edgewound,
    the F-connecter made it clear, thank you.

    The compression RCA connector is an intelligent part which I still did not find here (Reichelt.de and Google) - but a lot of adapters .
    May be other European readers know a distributor?
    ____________
    Peter

  14. #14
    Senior Member rs237's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoerninger View Post
    Edgewound,
    the F-connecter made it clear, thank you.

    The compression RCA connector is an intelligent part which I still did not find here (Reichelt.de and Google) - but a lot of adapters .
    May be other European readers know a distributor?
    ____________
    Peter

    Hello Peter,

    I have never heard of these connectors. But I prefer balanced XLR.

    regards
    juergen

  15. #15
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    Juergen,

    the problem is that the consumer gear has Cinch/RCA connectors. These compression RCA connectors make cable building easy (and presumably cheap and worthwile).
    But I am not a friend of Cinch, for example I still prefer a good DIN metal plug.
    The benefits of balanced XLR I know - once I built a 30 m multicore.
    ___________
    Peter

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. new loudspeaker cable
    By greyhound in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 01-06-2016, 02:12 PM
  2. Is it sacrelege? Am I evil? (long) - 4343 xover mods
    By 4343mod in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 05-11-2010, 03:20 AM
  3. JBL Speaker Cable!
    By coherent_guy in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 01:56 PM
  4. 4343 buyer's guide
    By lfh in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-14-2005, 08:38 PM
  5. Speaker Cable
    By ooppalla in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-22-2004, 11:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •