Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48

Thread: Usher D2 "clone" Project gone OPEN BAFFLE!!!

  1. #16
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    In addition to checking for excess overlap (I presume), a minor consideration
    is that the Behringer mic is probably not flat, but useful enough for relative
    comparisons (they often have a +3dB hump in the 2-10 KHz area). Nice
    project.

    -grumpy

  2. #17
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    Well here's the latest and greatest. Same setup as before, but this time with SynRTA's own pink noise.

    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  3. #18
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Try setting your acoustic crossover frequency at 900 Hz.

  4. #19
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    Why?
    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  5. #20
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743

    $.02 re crossover freq for Usher 15HM

    Looks like this driver (15HM) has a typical bit of lumpiness in the response
    around/above 1KHz... depending on the electronic crossover alone to blend
    the drivers isn't guaranteed to work well.

    3rd harmonic also appears to rise quickly above 900Hz.

    http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/296-630.pdf

    Seems like reasonable advice to me. -grumpy

  6. #21
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    Alright, I bumped the xover back to 900Hz. I haven't had a chance to run any tests, but things still sound great, so it definately didn't hurt. Thanks for the tip guys!


    Also, I keep forgetting to mention, eventhough the 15HM drivers are rated at 95dB, the ones I got were actually tested at 97, 97, 97.4 and 96.4dB. This would help explain the much more than expected efficiency that I'm getting out these. And as a note, I put both 97dB drivers together and both 96.4 and 97.4dB drivers together to get them as closely matched as possible.
    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  7. #22
    JBL 4645
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ChopsMX5 View Post
    A9X, thanks! I've been to all 3 of those links before. That first one is a huge thread... 52 pages! It'll take me a while to read through that one. LOL

    I hope you share your OB project with us when you get it done.



    Robh3606, you should try some OB's sometime. You just might like them. I'm not going to be doing anything to the surrounds. What I have for my sides and rears do just fine, and they're small. Now if I had a larger room, then I would probably do something similar to these for them.



    Hoerninger, I've got a decent DIY sub to take care of those very low notes. However, even when I do have the sub on, I've been letting the OB's still play fullrange. They blend in seamlessly this way and also add to the impact and punchiness of the sub (which the sub is crossed over at 50Hz). This works out very well.



    Cyclotronguy, I'm still using my Rane AC22B active crossover as I was with the old loudspeakers. I have the OB's woofers crossed over at 800Hz to the horns. After doing some more level corrections and woofer delay tweaks tonight after work, I've got these things really singing at the 800Hz x-over point. The midrange quality coming from these Usher 15HM drivers are simply stunning and life-like.



    JBL 4645, it would be nice to put the L/C/R channels behind the screen but I just don't have the space to do that in my room.
    Yes you do you’ve got amble space to place a third one between the two there’s not much depth to these speakers and third one, is so choice.

  8. #23
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by JBL 4645 View Post
    Yes you do you’ve got amble space to place a third one between the two there’s not much depth to these speakers and third one, is so choice.
    Umm... No I don't.
    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  9. #24
    JBL 4645
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ChopsMX5 View Post
    Umm... No I don't.
    ChopsMX5

    I think your right I just looked at the first page and the width of the room looks to be the same as mine so I apologise. I was only trying to give you support on the project to build a third because it sounds interesting that the bass cone has very little movement. This is cursed by having, them in a free space or openness and placed just in baffle? I’ve had very little experience with this type of design.

  10. #25
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by JBL 4645 View Post
    ChopsMX5

    I think your right I just looked at the first page and the width of the room looks to be the same as mine so I apologise. I was only trying to give you support on the project to build a third because it sounds interesting that the bass cone has very little movement. This is cursed by having, them in a free space or openness and placed just in baffle? I’ve had very little experience with this type of design.
    There's obviously some misunderstanding here going on here.

    You origianlly said to build the center channel and put all 3 front channels BEHIND the projection screen. That's where I said I wouldn't have room, because that would push the screen nearly 3' out into the room.

    But yes, I DO have room to build a matching OB'ed center channel, which is exactly what I plan on doing eventually. However, it will have only a single Usher 15HM driver, not two. The reason being that I need to save room on either side of the center channel for sub(s).
    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  11. #26
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119




    Well, all I can say so far is that I have a few mixed feelings about the latest tweaks.

    (A) & (D) The EQ settings from a few days ago after first batch of measurements, all done at the listening position.

    (B) & (E) The EQ settings after measuring the left channel only and getting a pretty flat response @ 1 meter.

    (C) & (F) The EQ settings after measuring both channels at the listening position, mostly leaving everything from 1.25kHz on up untouched after the "B" settings.

    First, the system sounds brighter now than it did a few days ago! That doesn't make much sense to me. You can clearly see that I knocked the top-end back quite a bit. It even shows on the graphs.

    Second, there's something fishy going on in the midrange now as the horns are starting to sound like "horns" again. IOW, there's a bit of honkiness going on which wasn't there before. In fact, I was able to completely get rid of it a few days ago. I think that might be that peak around 900Hz, which also happens to be the new xover frequency.

    Third, the upper-bass or lower-midrange (whichever you want to call it) it a little thicker sounding now. Almost conjested with some music. There's excellent, tight "kick" to the bass, but sometimes seems a bit much. However, overall low bass extension is excellent. In fact, I don't know if it's because these drivers are breaking in still or what, but they seem to be extending a little deeper now than a few days ago. If you look at graph "F", it kind of shows this. The roll-off isn't as steep as it was before.

    So at this point, the current tune is kind of iffy to me. It will be a couple of days or so until I can sit down and do some more listening... or testing for that matter.
    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  12. #27
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    OOPS!

    I just noticed that I inserted the wrong shot for "Graph E". This is the one that's supposed to be there...

    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  13. #28
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,205
    That EQ is really a bit heavy handed. That much is not helping you. Those +10-12 db bands are killing any headroom you have above your average level. If your running with a 100 watt amp you just lost 10dB of headroom right where you need it most in the 40-80Hz band. In effect you are working at 10 watts.

    Any bass drum hits will clip your amp. That could be the congestion you are hearing. Can you do more cut that boost. Anything over 6db of boost which cuts you headroom to 25% of what you would have without should be avoided.

    Try reversing the phase on the compresion driver. It may kill the peak, could could also give you a hole but see what sounds best.

    Isn't this an HT set up?? If so bring your subs on line and use them to fill in the last 2 1/2 octaves. That way you can avoid the most agressive use of the EQ

    Rob

  14. #29
    Senior Member ChopsMX5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    That EQ is really a bit heavy handed. That much is not helping you. Those +10-12 db bands are killing any headroom you have above your average level. If your running with a 100 watt amp you just lost 10dB of headroom right where you need it most in the 40-80Hz band. In effect you are working at 10 watts.

    Any bass drum hits will clip your amp. That could be the congestion you are hearing. Can you do more cut that boost. Anything over 6db of boost which cuts you headroom to 25% of what you would have without should be avoided.

    Try reversing the phase on the compresion driver. It may kill the peak, could could also give you a hole but see what sounds best.

    Isn't this an HT set up?? If so bring your subs on line and use them to fill in the last 2 1/2 octaves. That way you can avoid the most agressive use of the EQ

    Rob
    It has to be "heavy handed" as you put it to overcome the short comings of the small-ish baffles and drivers not meant for open baffle use. So with that in mind, it is helping me.

    And trust me, I'm not hurting for headroom, even with all that boost. These speakers are somewhere in the neighborhood of 104dB @ 1W/1M, if not a little more. The amp powering the woofers offers up 170 x 2 @ 4 ohms, which is what these drivers are wired to. The absolute most power I have seen going into these drivers so far is almost 14 watts, and that was getting close to 110dB at the listening position 12' away. That is a lot louder than I normally play my system.

    The congestion I'm getting is most likely from that large bump at 63Hz and 80Hz on the EQ. If I back those off a few dB, I'm sure things will snap into place.

    My Rane xover has adjustable woofer delay, so the next chance I get, I'll play around a bit with that with SynRTA as well as possibly reverse the polarity of the horns. Hopefully, that will sovle a couple of those issues around the xover freq.

    Yes, this is my HT setup, but its main roll is 2-channel stereo. The other 5.1 channels are just a bonus and ONLY for movies. That includes the subwoofer for the moment. Don't get me wrong, my sub sounds great with music, but I'd rather get these OB's sounding their best fullrange if possible, and without the sub.
    Charles
    http://charlest.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1014411387.jpg

  15. #30
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,205
    These speakers are somewhere in the neighborhood of 104dB @ 1W/1M, if not a little more.
    How are you getting those numbers?? The woofers are 95db figure 98db for 2. If the one you got were 97 figure 100db in the lower midband.

    Rob

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. an open baffle with altec 605a ?
    By better in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-16-2009, 11:49 PM
  2. Infinite Baffle Sub Project
    By Zekeman in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-14-2009, 03:46 PM
  3. 2235+2123+2344 project - baffle layout?
    By jerv in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-01-2007, 02:31 AM
  4. open baffle designs
    By louped garouv in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-30-2006, 08:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •