Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 3145 Biamp/Triamp Biased Network

  1. #1
    Senior Member Uncle Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    388

    3145 Biamp/Triamp Biased Network

    I took the Biamp section of the 3145 Biased network that Giskard graciously created and split it into three sections and modified by adding some protection caps for the compression driver.

    For use as a Biamp network BIAMP OUT connects to BIAMP IN and s1 is set to bypass the 47 uF caps. UHF IN is connected to MF IN.

    For use as a Triamp network TRIAMP IN and UHF IN are connected and s1 is set to place the 47 uF caps in the signal path. The purpose of these caps is to protect the compression driver. Fc is low enough (< 600 Hz) that it should not be audible, but I can always bypass them with s1 if desired.

    I'm considering copper foil inductors, but the closest I can get to exact values for the 0.10 mH and 0.6 mH are 0.11 mH and 0.62 mH respectively.

    My question here is if the copper foils are worth the extra expense?

    Is it worth the effort to unwind and re heat shrink copper foils to get exact values or are the stock values close enough?
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    "Zobel is as zobel does"

  2. #2
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Paul View Post
    My question here is if the copper foils are worth the extra expense?
    I would better spend the money on new diaphragms or whatever.


    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Paul View Post
    I'm considering copper foil inductors, but the closest I can get to exact values for the 0.10 mH and 0.6 mH are 0.11 mH and 0.62 mH respectively.
    Is it worth the effort to unwind and re heat shrink copper foils to get exact values or are the stock values close enough?
    IMHO it is close enough.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Uncle Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    388
    Hi Guido,
    Thanks for your input. I am planning to go through all my drivers as part of my project. The copper foils would add less than $30 to my project, so the cost difference is negligible. If it adds to the sonic quality then it's a good value. I'm really interested in whether the advantages of copper foil over air core perfect lay are real or hype.

    Thanks again and kindest regards,
    Paul
    "Zobel is as zobel does"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    The actual DCR values of those inductors in that particular design are relatively critcal to the correct voltage drives.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Uncle Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    388
    Ian,
    Thanks, settles it. I'll go with air core inducrtors that match the DCR's Giskard indicated in the original design.

    Paul
    "Zobel is as zobel does"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Capacitors...
    By lpd in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 06-14-2007, 07:16 AM
  2. New Equivalent 3145 crossover Network
    By Ian Mackenzie in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-15-2006, 05:46 AM
  3. N212 biased network - JBL L212 Loudspeaker System.
    By 4313B in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 07:28 AM
  4. Biased N-4412 Network
    By rek50 in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-13-2006, 11:29 AM
  5. 4345 / 3145 network schematic
    By dennis j leisz in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-10-2003, 11:41 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •