Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: PT-F95HF Compact Progressive Transition Waveguide

  1. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    I waited nearly three years for them to become available, PT-F95HF, the "Compact" version of the 90° x 50° Progressive Transition waveguide, JBL Pro part# 338650-001,....
    Why did they opt not to use a CD design on these? I assume it was to keep the depth at a minimum, but is there any other reason?

  2. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Excerpt from pdf link below:

    "Compared to JBL’s previous generation of horns, the PT series offers dramatically improved constant-coverage response, and improved frequency response, while keeping distortion low."

    http://www.jblpro.com/PD5000/PDF/PT_WaveGuide.pdf
    Very interesting. You can see from the plots that it loads the driver less than the 2383, but I guess that's why they call it a waveguide not a horn. The overall responses look really good. Thanks for the link.

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    846
    Isn't the overall gain of the horn a product of it's directivity? (I did read the literature although possibly not enough times) Also I didn't catch, when you were through, is there still a problem with this horn in combination with the 4435 or was there a problem with your driver?

  4. #19
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Yes. The HF compensation is different for each dispersion pattern among PTs of genrally the same design.

    PT-F95HF has a notch in the VHF with 243x drivers. The other PTs I've tried, which is most all of them, don't exhibit that anomaly. Other members are using those combinations successfully, as well.

    I haven't pursued it further. They're fine with BMS 4555 or 2452H-SL, as shown in the measurements. Somebody at JBL knows the answer, but I don't have access to them, even if they are willing to disclose it.

    They sound fine, actually, but I'm a curve junkie, and just can't rationalize using them that way. Maybe I'll send RobH a pair to verify....

  5. #20
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Thom View Post
    Isn't the overall gain of the horn a product of it's directivity? (I did read the literature although possibly not enough times) Also I didn't catch, when you were through, is there still a problem with this horn in combination with the 4435 or was there a problem with your driver?
    Yes, but what I was refering to is the impedance plot. A horn acts as an impedance matching device and a waveguide is just a patern controlling device. In the plots I saw there is a little ripple in the impedance plot that also shows up in the frequency response. I hope that clears it up.

    Cheers.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •