Isn't the overall gain of the horn a product of it's directivity? (I did read the literature although possibly not enough times) Also I didn't catch, when you were through, is there still a problem with this horn in combination with the 4435 or was there a problem with your driver?
Yes. The HF compensation is different for each dispersion pattern among PTs of genrally the same design.
PT-F95HF has a notch in the VHF with 243x drivers. The other PTs I've tried, which is most all of them, don't exhibit that anomaly. Other members are using those combinations successfully, as well.
I haven't pursued it further. They're fine with BMS 4555 or 2452H-SL, as shown in the measurements. Somebody at JBL knows the answer, but I don't have access to them, even if they are willing to disclose it.
They sound fine, actually, but I'm a curve junkie, and just can't rationalize using them that way. Maybe I'll send RobH a pair to verify....
Yes, but what I was refering to is the impedance plot. A horn acts as an impedance matching device and a waveguide is just a patern controlling device. In the plots I saw there is a little ripple in the impedance plot that also shows up in the frequency response. I hope that clears it up.
Cheers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)