Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: Amplifiers for TAD Exclusive 2402

  1. #16
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    Hi M

    Know anyone with a JMF amp? Why oh why did i sell the Berning...your words have come back to haunt me!

    Reckon a crown k2 will be good? Also looking for some tube euphonics.

    R


    Quote Originally Posted by merlin View Post
    I'm delighted to read that they succeeded in the removal of inter leakage Richard. What next I ask?


    PS. The JMF/JDF amps are(were) a good match.

  2. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    248
    Actually on the 2401 the Berning would have been stretched as it doesn't like a 4 ohm load with that output impedence, but yes, for the 2402 there is probably no finer option in my opinion. It would make most of the competition sound broken.

    The Crown will give you bass oomph. It's not even remotely in the same class as the Berning for other duties. You could of course try a big class A Accuphase.

  3. #18
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    Yes the 2402's are an easier 8ohm load compared to the 2401's. Checking the db/freq charts they seem to suggest that i need quite a few watts to generate the lower registers...maybe 100+

    Also looking at stands for the speakers. Maybe some simple cherry blocks from Yamamoto + some spikes on top and bottom...apparently the bottom of the upper horn must be at eye level.

    I have a guy in Stuttgart wanting to check the Twin's out...he already has Rey Audio RM8's.

    I also bought rather a nice preamp today...just searching for power now.

    Check out the charts attached.

    R
    ps. whats the story with your babies?




    Quote Originally Posted by merlin View Post
    Actually on the 2401 the Berning would have been stretched as it doesn't like a 4 ohm load with that output impedence, but yes, for the 2402 there is probably no finer option in my opinion. It would make most of the competition sound broken.

    The Crown will give you bass oomph. It's not even remotely in the same class as the Berning for other duties. You could of course try a big class A Accuphase.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    248
    Trust me richard, you don't need hundreds of watts on these - just a decent number of good ones.

    Are you speaking with Juergen?

  5. #20
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    Hi M

    At the moment i have two pairs of Shindo WE 300b (one pair first generation 1980's and the other from 1991, although i prefer the older!)....and a Shindo preamp (Model 77, simple preamp based on Western Electric circuit).

    The 300B's as you know put out only 8W...i don't think thats a problem for light jazz music but something more complex like classical i am worried could cause saturation, although the Shindo's output always belies that power rating...also a 4Watt Yamamoto A-02 i currently have with Yamamoto-San changing the transformers for EU 230V types.

    I bought a Wavac PR-T1 preamp also as a keeper, so maybe looking for something to power...hmmm.

    Juergen...havent spoken yet but yes i think he may be making a visit.

    R


    Quote Originally Posted by merlin View Post
    Trust me richard, you don't need hundreds of watts on these - just a decent number of good ones.

    Are you speaking with Juergen?

  6. #21
    lfh
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by merlin View Post
    Trust me richard, you don't need hundreds of watts on these - just a decent number of good ones.
    I second this. Since you posted all the nice graphs, I did some math for you:

    As a first approximation we can assume spherical propagation and free field conditions. The attenuation at distance r compared to the level at reference distance r0 is then given by:

    A_dB ~ 10*log10(r^2/r0^2) = 20*log10(r/r0)

    Let r0 = 1.0 m =>

    A_dB(1.0) = 20*log10(1.0) = 0.0 dB
    A_dB(2.0) = 20*log10(2.0) = 6.0 dB
    A_dB(2.5) = 20*log10(2.5) = 8.0 dB
    A_dB(3.0) = 20*log10(3.0) = 9.5 dB
    A_dB(4.0) = 20*log10(4.0) = 12.0 dB

    In practice the attenuation will be slightly lower (for reasons outside the scope of today )

    Similarily, the level at power P vs that of a reference power P0 is by definition:

    L_dB == 10*log10(P/P0)

    Let P0 = 1.0 W =>

    L_dB(0.01) = 10*log10(0.01) = -20 dB
    L_dB(0.1) = 10*log10(0.1) = -10 dB
    L_dB(1.0) = 10*log10(1.0) = 0 dB
    L_dB(10) = 10*log10(10) = 10 dB
    L_dB(30) = 10*log10(30) = 15 dB
    L_dB(100) = 10*log10(100) = 20 dB

    Finally, assumuing that SPL0 is the sensitivity (SPL at 1 W and 1 m), the SPL can be calculated as:

    SPL = SPL0 - A_dB + L_dB

    Example:

    SPL0 = 95 dB
    r = 2.5 m
    P = 30 W

    =>

    SPL = 95 - 8 + 15 = 102 dB

    Hence, if you listen at "normal" levels (around 80 dB average in my world), a smallish amp will do. However, do get one with low output impedance. The upside of this will be clear once you switch to active crossovers

    HTH
    Fredrik

  7. #22
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    Fredrik, brilliant thanks!

    In fact i'd been studying this myself after someone, maybe you!, suggested to do so. Yes, its never a perfect world so you always lose something...i suppose the room itself is the attenuator.

    From the calculations you gave my Yamamoto 2A3 amp (4W) at full stretch would provide 93db and the Shindo WE 300b (8W) 96db.

    My room is what you might call a small/medium sized studio room.

    Speakers are installed tomorrow. I havent got any stands for them so i'm going to cut up some spruce beam (10cm x 10cm) for them to sit on in the meantime, just to get them off the floor.

    I guess this is just the tip of the iceberg but it gives me a general idea! Thanks so much for taking the time to help.

    Richard

    Ps. Low output impedance like a Berning OTL...don't rub it in Fredrik, i sold mine recently and Merlin said i'd regret it...now i am! Any suggestions?

  8. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    248
    Richard,

    my take would be that the 1601a isn't going to like seeing some boutique SET with high output impedence trying to drive it - similarly it won't need a Crown K2 to kick it into life. You need a 70wpc - 100wpc SET effectively - now did you really sell that Berning?

  9. #24
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    Yes i did sell it...its somewhere in the land of kookoo clocks and fine chocolate.

    I have Jadis JA-200's but i'm taking them to be repaired on friday (hum problems). They are too big to be keepers.

    boutique...that's diplomatic.

    CAT, Joule, Air Tight and Atma spring to mind. What about ASL Hurricanes?

    R


    Quote Originally Posted by merlin View Post
    Richard,

    my take would be that the 1601a isn't going to like seeing some boutique SET with high output impedence trying to drive it - similarly it won't need a Crown K2 to kick it into life. You need a 70wpc - 100wpc SET effectively - now did you really sell that Berning?

  10. #25
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    And if John Stronczer is using his own Bel Canto gear...why not that.

  11. #26
    enjoy_the_music
    Guest
    Some photos of my boutique de pede tube amps driving the TAD's...ok for simple music but mushy for anything else.





    Quote Originally Posted by merlin View Post
    Actually on the 2401 the Berning would have been stretched as it doesn't like a 4 ohm load with that output impedence, but yes, for the 2402 there is probably no finer option in my opinion. It would make most of the competition sound broken.

    The Crown will give you bass oomph. It's not even remotely in the same class as the Berning for other duties. You could of course try a big class A Accuphase.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  12. #27
    Junior Member dangerisland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sebastopol, CA
    Posts
    5

    Red face Running my TAD 2402s

    I've owned a pair of 2402s for 4 years. I like the original crossovers and so I use an Audio Research SD135. I'm known for cycling through systems like six packs of beer, but in this case, I've stuck with this setup for over 2 years, basically a millennia. I find myself looking only for source improvements as this system just plays music. NFS.

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Ca
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by enjoy_the_music View Post
    Some photos of my boutique de pede tube amps driving the TAD's...ok for simple music but mushy for anything else.
    Attention a ton language s'il te plait!

  14. #29
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by dangerisland View Post
    I've owned a pair of 2402s for 4 years. I like the original crossovers and so I use an Audio Research SD135. I'm known for cycling through systems like six packs of beer, but in this case, I've stuck with this setup for over 2 years, basically a millennia. I find myself looking only for source improvements as this system just plays music. NFS.
    Sounds like the 2350's didn't do what you wanted. You have a solid set of speakers there. Glad you've found the music again.
    "Audio is filled with dangerous amateurs." --- Tim de Paravicini

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. need crossover for 2440 and 2402
    By MatthiasA in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2005, 01:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •