Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: looky What I Just Got

  1. #16
    Senior Member sourceoneaudio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,201

    Passive Radiator Issues

    We have reached max X-MAX with the Parts Express passives. So weighted and tuned correct they do not pass mustard. We are very close to picking up pieces of cone material off of the ground. Crazy Excursion during DTS formatted movies. Music is good, and bass response is tight, and punchy in the upper volume levels. So far these subs are very impressive, subtle low frequency passages during movie play back are very defined and amazing, I would recommend the use of these drivers for any application.

    So as far as new passives go I'm looking at these brands.

    http://www.tcsounds.com/tcvmp.htm#specs

    Seems they are one of the few manufacturing high X-MAX passives, 80mm peak to peak, and 500 to 2500 gram weight capacity.

    Specifications



    3" wide variable mass load adaptor
    500 grams up to ~2500 grams of variable mass (90 gram iterations)
    xmax of 40mm (one way linear compliance)
    Single ultra wide 10" poly-cotton spider
    Cast aluminum basket with high gloss metallic powder coating
    Tall (NBR) surround for high excursion and better longevity than foam

    Includes up to 2000 grams of selectable mass washers

    High quality thermal flexible epoxies to ensure longevity
    Rigid lightweight brushed aluminum cone
    Hand built in our San Diego, CA factory


    *mounting depth includes 2.0" extra spacing for excursion


    Thiele Small Parameters



    12" TC-VMP
    Vap0.0 Dia250mm Vas0.0l V-Fs4Hz-24Hz cms0.0m/N V-mms500g-2500g
    15" TC-VMP
    Vap0.0 Dia325mm Vas0.0l V-Fs4Hz-24Hz cms0.0m/N V-mms500g-2500g
    18" TC-VMP
    Vap0.0 Dia390mm Vas0.0l V-Fs4Hz-24Hz cms0.0m/N V-mms500g-2500g


    This is the other brand I'm looking at, and I have seen threads on th LH forum in regards to their use. Stryke Audio SA-PR18-1600. But I think production has stopped for I can't find a seller of them new. The link below is no longer carrying them.

    http://www.acoustic-visions.com/~acoustic/products/passive_radiators/stryke_pr18/indexold.shtml

    So needless to say the volume control has been regulated depending on the source input.

    The LH member who is helping me tune these bad boys has run the Stryke Audio 18" in a simulation and it seems to do the trick. Stated below are the results. This is the passive I would like to use if I can find some????
    The above PR will work just fine, but the cost is much higher, and they are out of stock on them.

    I modeled the 1600g in 5 cu ft, it looks absolutely bullet proof - Group delay is very low, power handling is off the chart, cone excursion for both is safe at 105db+ from 20Hz on up....dayum....

    Worthy of discussion in public. I'm only parroting what I see in ISD - I'd like to hear others' views...

    SA-PR18-1600

    FS 4hz

    Mms 1600 grams

    Qms85

    SD 1200cm^2

    Vd 9L

    Vas 1840L

    Xmax 76mm p-p

    If anyone can help with this issue in finding, or wanting to sell a couple of the Stryke Audio passives let me know.

    J/S-S1A
    Jeff-S1A

  2. #17
    clmrt
    Guest
    Here's what I've run so far -



    Can't attach a .wpr

    I can email it to anyone who'd like to see it.

    5 foot box, 200 watt input, three scenarios -

    1x PE 15" PR
    2x PE 15" PR
    1x 18" PR

  3. #18
    Senior Member sourceoneaudio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,201

    Underlying Issues

    Quote Originally Posted by sourceoneaudio View Post
    We have reached max X-MAX with the Parts Express passives.


    J/S-S1A

    Well I have spent more time messing around with these subs because I have felt something was missing. Yes Clmrt and I have discussed putting them in a bigger enclosure, but I still felt that I could get more form the cabinets in hand.
    So I messed around with adding more weight, pulling insulation, ended up putting back the insulation to a thinner layer on the bottom and putting the weight back to first calculation. While I was doing all of this I noticed the spider had come unglued from the basket. This is bad because it threw the alignment off under extreme conditions, and I was getting a serious blapping. The extreme x-max issues as I stated above partially was due to this new discovery. This was not the fault of adding the JBL's in, I have had this problem for a while, never expected or even looked for it since they are not that old. So I re-glued back to the basket, and it's all better now. I also reduced the sub out to -2db and now that they are broken in, which does take a while, the low frequency reproduction gets more and more impressive every time I listen to them. Let me tell you what, this is the first sub design that I have ever done that during a movie formatted in either DTS, or Dolby Digital when a low passage comes out from no where, and I did not expect it, I about jump off the couch. Definitely a HOLY SHIT experience! So needles to say these W15GTI's kick some serious ASH!
    So bigger box? Still up in the air. $$$

    J/S-S1A
    Jeff-S1A

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    71
    Even with the PR fixed, going to dual opposing PR's is a very good idea. Though the linear throw of the W1-GTi series does not quite measure as [url-http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11864]one would expect it to[/url] (notes about a W15GTi measured further down in the thread) with a 15", 22mm xmax PR you're still on the edge even if the realistic xmax is only ~12mm on the woofer itself. A second one will also have the advantage of cancellng out box vibrations.

  5. #20
    Senior Member sourceoneaudio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,201
    Thank you for the information. I copied the link so that it functions.

    http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/...ad.php?t=11864

    http://www.jblpro.com/pub/technote/J...-33%20rev3.pdf

    Jeff
    J/S-S1A
    Jeff-S1A

  6. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    846
    I've played with this woofer a tiny and I mean tiny bit. They must have used steel where the pro woofers use aluminum because they're supposed to be light and this bugger is heavy as hell. I've really only tried it in a sealed box that was designed for a pickup and it wasn't what I expected at all. Going to try ported but I expected, stick a DC300 on it with an active crossover and be impressed and it's going to need more than that.

  7. #22
    Senior Member northwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    far east evil CCP jail
    Posts
    706
    cool
    A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enought to take away everything from you

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. LOOKY WHAT I JUST GOT......more L100s!
    By Fred Sanford in forum Miscellaneous Gear
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-16-2007, 11:34 AM
  2. Looky, Looky !!
    By Don McRitchie in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 10-18-2005, 01:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •