Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Jubal woofer fubar?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member DanMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    austin
    Posts
    157

    Jubal woofer fubar?

    Question about my L65's, and before you give me grief, lansing heritage automated email sent me my birthday greeting today.... so thanks and be kind ;-)

    I bought these Jubal L65's on ebay long ago, so I'm way over the 30 day return policy... ;-)

    It appears to me that the woofers were refoamed incorrectly - I added my comments in red in the pics below > I'm used to seeing my JBL woofer surrounds glued to the other side of the spacer onto the basket. (pardon if my terminology is incorrect).

    Are these surrounds indeed on incorrectly?

    The ohm meter shows 7.7 ohms across the woofer - what does that mean?

    The speakers 'sound' 'ok' up to about 85db, but I wont turn it up louder than that in fear of harming either the speakers or the amp.

    I bought these for the sound quality not quantity.

    Am I in fact getting distortion throughout the volume range or only at the new peak excursion limits?

    Is there a different mix of frequency response if they're on incorrectly?

    Should they be refoamed?

    Thanks.
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  2. #2
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Yes, they should be refoamed.

    That's REALLY stupid what they did there. It's supposed to be UNDER the gasket at the edge, on the metal frame.

    At the cone, it should be on the rear, but that takes effort by someone who knows what they are doing.

    If the cone kit is available, have a full recone done by a pro.

    You were screwed by an idiot....

  3. #3
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    ouch. clench your buttocks before pricing a recone... it would appear that an OK set
    of L65's might go for about the price of a pair of recones for this driver. Think I'd be looking for either
    a re-refoam (bastard side or not) or a functioning set of bass drivers that someone else
    has pulled. Someone else check me on this. -grumpy

  4. #4
    Senior Member DanMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    austin
    Posts
    157
    thanks guys. recone it is.

    i guess that just leaves two questions that at this point are really more theoretical than functional -

    1- Am I getting distortion throughout the volume range or only at the new peak excursion limits?

    2 - Is there a different frequency response curve if they're on incorrectly (I'm assuming weaker in the bass region)?

  5. #5
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Quote Originally Posted by DanMan View Post
    thanks guys. recone it is.

    i guess that just leaves two questions that at this point are really more theoretical than functional -

    1- Am I getting distortion throughout the volume range or only at the new peak excursion limits?
    almost certainly throughout... it appears you're already about 1/2 way out of the gap one way
    (harmonic distortion, which you may or may not pick up as sounding "bad")

    Quote Originally Posted by DanMan View Post
    2 - Is there a different frequency response curve if they're on incorrectly (I'm assuming weaker in the bass region)?
    I would -expect- so, and level dependent. One could look up studies on dynamic offset
    for characteristics that would be mild in comparison.

    Way to buck up for the recone... best way to go if these are keepers. -grumpy

  6. #6
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,202
    almost certainly... it appears you're already about 1/2 way out of the gap one way
    (harmonic distortion, which you may or may not pick up as sounding "bad")
    Hello Grumpy

    You really don't know that as these are probably the wrong surrounds as well. The foams relative position has changed you need to look at the driver as a whole to determine what's actually going on. What you need to do is see where the spider is at rest. If it's flat he may not have as much of an offset issue as you would think.

    Rob

  7. #7
    JBL 4645
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    Yes, they should be refoamed.

    That's REALLY stupid what they did there. It's supposed to be UNDER the gasket at the edge, on the metal frame.

    At the cone, it should be on the rear, but that takes effort by someone who knows what they are doing.

    If the cone kit is available, have a full recone done by a pro.

    You were screwed by an idiot....
    Yes underneath the gasket whoa I wouldn’t be surprised if the (voice coil) is rubbing against the core, yikes.

  8. #8
    Senior Member markd51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Sheboygan, Wisconsin
    Posts
    218
    Hello Folks,
    Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late, but I'd like to re-hash what's been written, and have some curious questions of my own.

    Being an owner of four original L-65's since new, (You gurus know how long that is) my questions are, since the re-cone kit for the 126A Driver is no longer available, what options are there should one hypothetically blow a Driver?

    An unlikely event that I'd blow a Driver, and most likely would need re-foam in the future. To inform all, my four 126A drivers were totally reconed twice in the past 34 years, never just re-foamed. They were done twice by authorized JBL repair centers, and thus as you all know, they would never just re-foam these Drivers.

    So then, what would be one's option? Can the 126A be re-coned with another model # Re-cone Kit? If so, then what changes if any, are needed to be done to the X-Overs? (inductors-Caps-etc)

    As you can see in my particular example, if a change would be needed to another driver, that would no doubt mean a minimum of at least both drivers in a pair, or perhaps even "times four".

    Would I then have to convert to all different Drivers, L-65A, or L-65B drivers, which I assume it the 122A, or 129H? Or? Mark
    Last edited by markd51; 11-22-2007 at 09:08 AM. Reason: addition

  9. #9
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    they are wrong. I wud have them refoamed.

    Z gave a better answer, while I was looking/typing.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. L 65a woofer?
    By toddrr in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-26-2010, 10:47 AM
  2. L65 Jubal upgrades
    By mech986 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-25-2009, 03:04 PM
  3. JBL 12" Woofer
    By speakerdave in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 02:58 AM
  4. L300 woofer question.
    By ttrhp in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-07-2006, 09:26 AM
  5. Woofer Frequency Testing Take 2
    By toddalin in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-26-2005, 03:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •