Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 4350's: Very uneven frequency response

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    55

    4350's: Very uneven frequency response

    I have finished my room, I will post pics later. My setup:
    JBL 4350's (studio version)
    Mac Intosh MC7300 (low)
    Mac Intosh MC7150 (high)
    Mac Intosh C38 Pre-Amp
    Wadia CD player
    JBL active cross-over Model 5232

    I bought a sound level meter at Radio Shack (low end unit) and measured the frequency response of the 4350's paying attention to the Left-Right balance.
    I found that the system is massively out of balance, depending on the freuqnecies. I placed the meter at my listening posisiton, or 11feet from the 4350's. I have attached the graph of the frequency plot.
    In some cases, like 126Hz, the differential is a much as 24db between left and right.
    I wonder if there might be something wrong with the electronics that I use? Any ideas?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,170
    What are you using as a signal?? Did you take into account the FR of the meter?? Can you borrow an RTA??

    Rob

  3. #3
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963

  4. #4
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,734
    Looks like that in the very least you could check the polarity on the 2235's and 2202,s; check the polarity on your low frequency amp connections, and turn up the tweets (although you may not be able to if you are using the 3107's).

    Check carefully going into and out of that active crossover; JBL does not follow standard pin polarity conventions. And their woofer cones move forward with an upward moving voltage to the black terminal. By the way, you would very likely find it sonically advantages to upgrade to the 5235. They are not very expensive and are said to be a marked improvement.

    The Radio Shack SPL meter is known to be down in the upper frequencies. It's good for general level measurements, but not really useful for frequency response charts (I know--I've tried it, and my ears told me different).

    Also, it may be that your crossovers need to be rebuilt.

    David

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    55
    Robh3606,

    I used ProTools to generate the signal. I have a digital mixer TASCAM DM4800 hooked up to my Mac Intosh Pre. There is a plugin in ProTools to generate a sine wave and I can dial the frequency in 1Hz increments.

  6. #6
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,170
    Can you do an Pink Noise signal, narrowband like a warble tone or 1/3-1 octave bands. Using sine waves is tuff because you can excite narrow band resonances and small changes in microphone placement can make a big difference. Forget the measurements how do they sound???

    Rob


    This will help you on the lowend. Try a search if these don't work there are a couple of sources up on the net for the files

    http://www.digido.com/modules.php?na...article&sid=16

    http://www.digido.com/modules.php?na...howpage&pid=62

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    What are you using as a signal?? Did you take into account the FR of the meter?? Can you borough an RTA??

    Rob
    Borough...sounds like NY city regions.

    I think you mean borrow.

    j20056 try measuring the voltage drives per the JBL test jig to confirm the passive crossover is functioning properly.

    Ian

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    55
    JBL test jig? can you elaborate, not sure i know what you mean.

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,942
    Yep,

    Un-gated (time) measurements are meaningless in your room because the meter part from its lack of accuracy is reading the room as well the 4350..

    Assuming your drivers and crossover wiring is correct it should be okay.

    The 4350 is really a far field monitor incidentally. Meaning listening at anything less than 3 meters or so is not going to allow the system to integrate properly. This also makes it difficult to realise meaningful measuremnts in your house.

    Ian

  11. #11
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,720
    Quote Originally Posted by j20056 View Post
    I have finished my room...
    Where are you located? It may be possible to have someone with some actual measuring gear pop by and check out your room/system.

    In-room measurements can be quite problematic, but seeing the room, speaker location, and settings on your gear can answer some of your questions.


    Widget

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Frequency Response
    By Mr. Widget in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 12:20 PM
  2. L 150 frequency response
    By Cliff A. in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-26-2006, 08:16 AM
  3. Altec 291 K16 Frequency response
    By L100t Owner in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-19-2006, 11:01 AM
  4. L65A Frequency response charts
    By mdurso in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-29-2006, 11:22 AM
  5. Frequency Response Testing on the W15GTI
    By toddalin in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2006, 06:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •