Page 10 of 59 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 881

Thread: Look at my new babies...Altec 846Bs w/EV Tweeters!

  1. #136
    Senior Member louped garouv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    formerly "the city where imagination takes precedence over fact"
    Posts
    2,152
    I still hope it wasn't the "original" foam in good condition.......

    although the likelyhood of that seems slim (most of the foam surrounds for the Altec sectoral horns seems to have crumbled long ago)

    BTW -- I like people that speak in absolutes.....

  2. #137
    Senior Member Storm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    1,259
    Quote Originally Posted by louped garouv View Post
    although the likelyhood of that seems slim (most of the foam surrounds for the Altec sectoral horns seems to have crumbled long ago)
    I wonder if Sonofagun could make replacements?...

    Just a thought.

    -Storm.

  3. #138
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343
    Quote Originally Posted by Storm View Post
    I wonder if Sonofagun could make replacements?...

    Just a thought.

    -Storm.
    Worth a shot! Try to find out.
    scottyj

  4. #139
    Senior Member louped garouv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    formerly "the city where imagination takes precedence over fact"
    Posts
    2,152

    faom baffle inserts

    if he dosen't still make them there are a few others at least....
    I think he was looking for $125/pair (shipping included) last I saw, but that was a while ago


    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ead.php?t=9592

  5. #140
    Nightbrace
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by sourceoneaudio View Post
    This is what nightbrace is trying to explain here. I think a better driver and a better x-over network design would yield you results that are true to the human ear, and fill in what is missing. When I get mine totally done I want you to come over for a listen OK? Then you can see and understand what we are talking about.

    J/S-S1A

    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ad.php?t=14731
    At least someone seems to understand what I'm trying to say . Up to ~ 9 kHz, the Altec horns need little help. And there's no truth in him saying that the vocals are distorted on the Altecs and crystal clear with the addition of the EV T-35's. These EV tweeters actually have a similiar response as the Altec horns, and maybe fill in part of the gap, but its at the expense of adding coloration to an already colored speaker; completely changing the sonic character of that speaker. Adding something much higher without ruining the integrity of the speakers midrange response is whats needed if one was wanting to "upgrade" these speakers successfully. At this point its merely speculating as to what these EV's are doing that make them sound so much better, but there has been no talk as about how the addition of these tweeters is "altering" the unique sonic character of the Altec horn rather than supplementing it, which is all its really doing. As to "why" Storm likes this speaker better, its totally subjective, and there's no difinitive reason that anyone can give him except his own ears. There are ways to make them sound "better" by coming up with a better network to incorporate the EV tweeter, but this may or may not be "in-line" with what Storm's preferences are and it may do more harm than good by changing something that he already enjoys. Who knows, the person he bought these speakers from could have had the exact same preferences and built these speakers just for Storm without even knowing it.

    Starting off a set of tweeters at or around 9 kHz, would do a lot to add to the overall presentation of the speaker without removing the sonic character that makes them Altec. Even then the differences would only be audible when playing really high quality material (certainly not the material he is auditioning) and its only the crispness and brilliance of the sound that would be perceived as being different and I think that overall they would sound pretty similiar either way.

    I propose using a 077 or 2405H with the addition of something similiar to whats used in my S21's to add to the current networks. Starting them off at 8.5 kHz acutually looks about right. When I get the chance I'll run my 2405H tweeters alongside my Altec 19's to see how well they blend together. I imagine that they would work quite nicely. The highs would be added on-axis without the worry of interaction or ruining the sonic character of the Altec horn.

    These speakers may have opened his eyes to the fact that there are other speakers out there besides Altec that are good, EV being one of them.. Trust me when I say that if there was truly a way to get my Altec's to play better I would be the first to try it, they have remained stock for a reason, as I'm 100% happy the way they are. When I am concerned with having GREAT UHF"s, I got my JBL's if I need 'em, but no JBL living or dead can make bass like my Altec 19's, nor can they duplicate the unique sonic character of the Altec horn.

    It would be a shame to overshadow or add to that sound with anything else. If you don't like it that's fine, there are other speakers you may enjoy more, but saying that these speakers are now suddenly better with these EV's is preposterous. They are no longer Altec's in my eyes, and have a combination of two drivers playing at once with some info from one and some from the other. Like playing two different speakers at once.

  6. #141
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbrace View Post
    At least someone seems to understand what I'm trying to say . Up to 10 kHz, the Altec horns need little help, frequencies over 10 kHz is where the horns start to fall off.
    There's apparently a 10 dB drop from 1 kHz to 10 kHz, and they need plenty of help in that range.

    Not leaping to conclusions just yet, but from the information presented thus far, they rather suck.

    If you dial the horn balanced with the woofer, they're sonically "dull." If you push it up for highs, you induce a huge midrange hump.

    M19 mitigates this somewhat via network filter compensation, but still crashes in the UHF.

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...ad.php?t=12305

  7. #142
    Nightbrace
    Guest
    Wonder if those plots take into consideration the M19? I only notice fall-off with really high frequencies on my 19's. Maybe this is why using the right tube amp is SO crucial as to smooth out the midrange "hump" your talking about. I'll be the first to admit that with the wrong gear these will make your ears bleed.

  8. #143
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by louped garouv View Post
    I still hope it wasn't the "original" foam in good condition.......

    although the likelyhood of that seems slim (most of the foam surrounds for the Altec sectoral horns seems to have crumbled long ago)

    BTW -- I like people that speak in absolutes.....
    Mine are still original...just the foam grills are long gone. I do have the original frames that were covered with black grill cloth, though.

  9. #144
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbrace View Post
    I got my JBL's if I need 'em, but no JBL living or dead can make bass like my Altec 19's, nor can they duplicate the unique sonic character of the Altec horn.
    Thankfully, perhaps....

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbrace View Post
    Wonder if those plots take into consideration the M19? I only notice fall-off with really high frequencies on my 19's. Maybe this is why using the right tube amp is SO crucial as to smooth out the midrange "hump" your talking about. I'll be the first to admit that with the wrong gear these will make your ears bleed.
    Two plots relating to M19 have been presented so far here, and I previously posted a comprehensive simulation showing how that crossover functions. The factory curves were also posted by Dylanl in the linked thread:

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...873#post137873

    I consider it a recipe for madness trying to "fix" speakers via amp selection. At best, that's an imprecise band-aid that can never solve the problem....

  10. #145
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbrace View Post
    I'll be the first to admit that with the wrong gear these will make your ears bleed.
    My experience has been that there is a lot of wrong gear then.



    Widget

  11. #146
    Nightbrace
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    I consider it a recipe for madness trying to "fix" speakers via amp selection. At best, that's a bandaid that can never solve the problen....
    As do I , probably why the "better" amps I tried sounded downright awful on them.

  12. #147
    Nightbrace
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch View Post
    Two plots relating to M19 have been presented so far, and I did a comprehensive simulation of what the crossover does.
    Is there anything that can be done to "help" the crossovers? From what I gather by taking away too much they are too boring, and by adding too much they'll be overbearing.. There has to be a middle ground that'll make them work.. Unless the only way is the way I've found by using a certain tube amp to power them. Is this why many people EQ Altec? To compensate for what they are lacking? Ironically the same output tubes (7591) sound downright awful on JBL when compared to a true Class A amp.

  13. #148
    Senior Member Storm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    1,259
    I still can't believe that you guys doubt me when I say they are now listenable without getting fatigued, compared to stock 846's.

    If you dont have a pair to compare them to, stop arguing.

    Thanks.

    -Storm.

  14. #149
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    120
    I measured my 802-8gs on a 511b with Radian diaphragms. I measured from 18" on axis and also at 45deg. I used my Tact which has a calibrated mic. The results are amateurish but maybe Zilch will get a kick out of them.

    First one is on axis, the second one is 45 off to the side.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  15. #150
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Thanks, Shane.

    45° is kinda extreme, but there's certainly nobody home out there in VHF on the second one.

    I can't figure the horizontal scale very well. At what frequency is that cliff in the HF in your first plot? 7 kHz, maybe?

    Is the driver running on any kind of filter in these plots?

    If not, it looks like that one could be compensated, assuming, and this is a BIG assumption, the horn would support it.

    How do you normally play these? In what system?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Plantronics to Acquire Altec Lansing
    By watchman in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-31-2006, 09:04 AM
  2. Altec 3000 series tweeters in 890B's
    By bookasan in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-27-2004, 06:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •