Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: 4301B

  1. #1
    Junior Member taro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14

    4301B

    Hi to all; this is my first post.
    It was at the end of the seventies when I got a look at JBL. Here in Germany I think JBL was known for live like reproduction of music and from advertising with the pros. From 79' to 84' I bought L50, 4301B, L112, L150A and I liked them all, with the L150A the best. Whish I had them today, because for some reasons I sold everything in the second half of the eighties.
    About five years ago the HiFi virus got me again. After various apeakers (diy and factory built) I came across a pair of 4301B, which were in really good condition. With some oiling of the veneer and a kit from Rick for the 116H woofers they looked like I bought them new two weeks ago. They sounded good, not only for nostalgic reasons, especialty in the bass part.
    While reading in this forum I found the schematic of the network and decided to change to some better parts. I changed the tiny 1.2 mH iron coil to an air coil with 1.4 mm Wire (0.3 Ohm) and the 0.4 mH iron coil to an air coil with exact the same dcr.
    For the caps I took intertechnik MKP's. (15+1.5 and 6.8+0.22). I also added to both 0,01 Vishay Roederstein caps because this can't hurt and they are cheap.
    The result was readily audible in the whole range. The already good bass was crisper and clearer as well as the midrange. Subjectiv the LE26 sounded as if it went to 17 or 18k without any harshness.
    So for its size and money I think this smallest of the 43xx series can hold its own against many others, new or old.
    Attached Images Attached Images      

  2. #2
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Welcome, Taro, and thank you for the beautiful pictures.

    4301Bs are a forum favorite!!

  3. #3
    Junior Member taro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14

    Smile

    Thank you. The knowledge base here is great, I learned so much.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    La Habra, California USA
    Posts
    1,546
    Hi Taro and welcome to the Forum also. From the near mint appearence of your 4301B's, it is evident you treat your JBL's well.

    I do have one question/caveat. I always thought most crossovers try to keep their inductors away from each other and mounted at right angles with respect to each other (orthogonal). That is to minimize inductor interactions due to current induced magnetic fields. Since these inductors are not self shielding, that may be a consideration - I do know though you don't have much room on the crossover/input connector board to work with.

    Regards,

    Bart

  5. #5
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Quote Originally Posted by taro View Post
    ...I came across a pair of 4301B, which were in really good condition. ... So for its size and money I think this smallest of the 43xx series can hold its own against many others, new or old.
    Whoa, those are some real beauts. Really.

    I've two pair in current constant use - shop and officeoffice - and they never cease to amaze me. Interesting idea on updating the crossover - I've only added bypass caps to mine, and that alone was a good improvement.

    To me, these remain one of the most surprising offerings from JBL. Too often overshadowed by larger and more complex models - but we all know there are real merits to a two-way, when properly executed.

    I maintain that JBL, while surely engineering every model carefully, got really lucky with this one...
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  6. #6
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,735
    Quote Originally Posted by taro View Post
    About five years ago the HiFi virus got me again.


    Damned hard to shake isn't it.

    Welcome aboard!


    Widget

  7. #7
    Senior Member soundboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    211
    I, too have some mint 4301B's...I love 'em. I left the origonal coils, because I took up the whole board with claritycaps SA series. Huge difference...and, I like the bass the way it is, so I left the old iron cores in there. Didn't want to mess with the Q of the bass at all...I have more transparent speakers, but whenever I fire these up, they always surprise me with how freakin' right it all sounds...I found the L26 tweeter to be surprisingly good after the capacitor change....good luck, and have fun with your bug!

  8. #8
    Junior Member taro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14
    Thank you. I think you are right with the stacked coils. I will change that, so there isn't much space. Considerung the Q of the bass you can take an air coil with 0,4 - 0,5 Ohm. This will not change the Q but lower the distortion and will clear things up considering the deviding point is 2,5k.

  9. #9
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    'zat a L96 on the stand...? I love that one in the 43xx series - the 4313B.

    Try it - you'll like it...
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  10. #10
    Senior Member soundboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    211
    You are wrong, Taro. Adding ANY resistance raises the Q of the bass rolloff, doesn't matter where the crossover point is. I don't know what the DCR is of the origonal iron cores are...it's on here somewhere, most likely a Giskard post, but I am pretty sure it is less than the equivelant air core....that is why I just left mine intact...the 4301's are famous for their bass already.. You would have to have at least 14 guage wire to even come close to an iron core in low DCR..what I do think, is that your new coils cleaned up the midrange clarity, and probably aren't enough of an increase in DCR to make much difference in the bass ( like you mentioned). Less than a half ohm usually isn't that audible, and won't change the bass bump that much IME. Love those pictures...put it on my desktop, thank you!!!

  11. #11
    majick47
    Guest

    4301b

    Taro some great pictures of your 4301b. My second system has a pair of 4301b mounted on the wall useing heavy duty JBL pro brackets in a room that's about 8'x10'. For the size of the speakers they are impressive and my setup probably closely reflects their original pro intent of being designed for monitoring in a small space. Two additional pairs of 4301b are being used in my surround system for the side and rear speakers. Also used heavy duty pro speaker mounting brackets to attach the 4301b to ceiling beams and wall.

  12. #12
    Senior Member kingjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    chicago,IL
    Posts
    1,333
    Taro, is that a Mazda ad with naked girls sitting below that crossover?

  13. #13
    Junior Member taro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14
    Hi Soundboy, you misunderstood me. I mesured the stock iron 1.2 mH coil, it is about 0.45 Ohm. This is in the range (0.4-0.5) of JBL stock coils, according to some well known people here. The air coil I took has 1.4mm wire and 0.3 Ohm. This slight reduction in resistance tends to make the bass slightly more crisp. The main concern is the air coil makes much less distortion, which is clearly heared because the bass must do the whole range up to 2.5k.
    Oh - I didn't have noticed the Madzda ad - you are right.
    Thanks taro

  14. #14
    Junior Member taro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14
    Hi Bo. Yes, that are L96 on the stands which I bought some month ago. When I got to the seller I had to look twice. The L96's were stored in JBL boxes for over 20 years, and so they looked like they were bought last week at the next dealer. The only thing, when I touched the foam it fell apart. So I dealed up a lower price and took them home. With new surrounds they looked great.
    regards taro
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  15. #15
    Senior Member Fangio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    789
    Quote Originally Posted by taro View Post
    About five years ago the HiFi virus got me again.
    Sounds familiar to me. Be warned there is no cure known here so far.

    Welcome to Lansing Heritage taro. Looks like some JBLs in exceptional shape you have there.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JBL 4301B Studio Monitor Pro Series - thoughts?
    By Njord Noatun in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-27-2011, 11:59 AM
  2. 4301b on wall mounts
    By majick47 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-03-2006, 10:39 AM
  3. 4301b enclosures
    By kingjames in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 05:58 PM
  4. First Post 4301B Woofer Question
    By zcondo in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-07-2006, 09:12 PM
  5. Schematics for 4301b needed
    By cary in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-18-2005, 08:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •