Hi Guys
I would like to know what you all might have to think about the Constant Directivity lens versus the normal wide dispersion lens found on most horn speakers. In particular the situation with regards the use of our largish JBL’s in rather smallish rooms. Recently on a posting by Niklas Nord, the necessity of side wall treatment was addressed and mention was also made of direct versus reflected sound. The room that the S9500 is in looks to be about 12’ wide. I happen to own the S3100 and had for a number of years used them in a 12’ x 27’ room. I was able, because of the CD lens, to place them almost touching the side walls with very little side-wall reflected sound. On records with various surface problems I did have that problem on occasion but found that overall it was not of great signifigance with most Lps being fine and CDs of course being no problem at all. I am fortunate in that I now have enlarged my room to over 700 sq.ft. 35’ x 24’ on the long side with a bit of a cut out – a rather irregular room. Because of posts and the like I use the 3100 across a corner 12’ apart and because the room runs away from them I hear no side-wall reflections at all. The imaging that I get is incredible and at times it sounds as if I have surround sound. The bass has also improved. I have no room treatment other than recoreds - 2500 - and books, but at times I do feel that I would not mind a bit more splashy sound that a dome tweeter might give. I guess there are trade offs for everything. But back to my original question : would a CD lens not make more sense for the majority of listeners out there who have small rooms and cannot or will in all probability never do room treatment ?
Thanks for your thoughts. Bernard