4343 crossover modifications

[B&KMan]

Ok. Let me examine it again.

Giskard, If you need or wannt any complementary test of info let me know...

thanks for all.

I record test for mesure electrical volta with-out 2231 componend connected into a network if this information is pertinant I put on forum

Jean.

[Earl K]

I not shure if I'M write or read correct but I'm never re-build network, this is my project now and it is my first time...

I understand that you want to rebuild the network sometime in the future.

(Maybe I'm not understand all double sense : my english is too poor)

- I think I am confusing you with past / present / & future tenses of english verbs & phrases .

- Your english is much better than my french.

and realy happy and thanks for Guildo for pict of voltage curve.

- Yes , that was a valuable and timely bit of information .

[Guido]

This 3141 schematic also have the 52 uF in Line :shock:


Or am I now?

[4313B]

Yeah, they both look jacked up.

Run your voltage drives with the wire on either side of the 52 uF and note the changes. Know what I mean?

[Guido]

Yeah, they both look jacked up.

As I wrote, they are cabled like that !

Aha! We found the ultimate way to optimize a 3143 network

[4313B]

Run your voltage drives with the wire on either side of the 52 uF and note the changes. Know what I mean?

[Guido]

Know what I mean?

Exactly

But it will take time to do that.

[4313B]

I get changes for the MF and HF but the UHF stays pretty much the same since that value only changes from the nominal 1.0 uF to a nominal 0.98 uF.

I guess you guys will need to see which sounds better.

Anyway, at least now you see why I said that 52 uF had to stay...



No wonder I ran mine bi-amped!

[Guido]

Anyway, at least now you see why I said that 52 uF had to stay...

Honestly I see no sense why. I biamped mode it is out also. So what the heck.....
They confused us again

[Earl K]

- It might have been a direction taken in circuit design / based soley on power handling concerns .

- That 52 uf cap pretty effectively protects the 4uf & 1uf from over voltage.

- Too bad one has to listen to it to get the benefit of its' protection .

[4313B]

I'm inclined to think it was a mistake.

I'd try wiring it so the 52 uF is only in the MF bandpass.

See how it sounds.

[B&KMan]

- It might have been a direction taken in circuit design / based soley on power handling concerns .

Bonsoir et merci pour tout ces réponses
(Good night and thanks for all reply)


First sorry for confuse "time conjugate" It is tuff to integrate complex electronic material with fence language. Apologise.

(Iti s very long to compose the response and try what is exactly the response data in my language)

For this point the 52 UF is run more safe because the caps is more chunk exact...

Of couse if I subtitute the 52 Cap by a 40 caps plus other 10 Uf caps Plus 2 X 1 UF caps all these caps is in parrallele circuit ??? Yes ???

So in according the big caps is (EX: 200V) all caps build in parrallele is minimum 200V) ??? For safety right ???

I try a other way my same question....

What is a criterion for maching parrallele " component circuit Caps) in regards at the voltage at start ???

ex: if I have a 52 Uf and the capacity is 400 V all parrallele cicuit caps is value of 400V or alll is sum of 400V ???



Jean.

[B&KMan]

Looks not too bad.

Pic shows theoretical voltage drive.

HEYS GUYS

Finnaly this spec is corrolar to 4343 response or not ???



Thanks

Jean

[Earl K]

Hi Jean

Of couse if I subtitute the 52 Cap by a 40 caps plus other 10 Uf caps Plus 2 X 1 UF caps all these caps is in parrallele circuit ??? Yes ???

Yes,,, that combination = 52 uf .

So in according the big caps is (EX: 200V) all caps build in parrallele is minimum 200V) ??? For safety right ???

Yes,,, capacitors when added in parallel get a voltage rating from that of the smallest rated (voltage) cap.
So,,,, if they are all rated at 200 volts,,, the combinations has a rating for 200 volts.

Capacitors is series have the voltage ratings of the two caps summed .
So,,,, two 100 volt caps in series has a voltage rating of 200 volts .

I try a other way my same question....

What is a criterion for maching parrallele " component circuit Caps) in regards at the voltage at start ???

ex: if I have a 52 Uf and the capacity is 400 V all parrallele cicuit caps is value of 400V or alll is sum of 400V ???

If the circuit actually needed a 400V rating / then all the caps that you use to make up a 52uf combination should have a 400 volt rating .

But, generally , JBL uses a lot of 100 volt caps in its crossover .

<>

[B&KMan]

Looks not too bad.

Pic shows theoretical voltage drive.

Well, this pict is a gold information... (I assume is relevant of the 3143 spec.)

After print in big scale, and check my all mesures and build hand curve by comparison of report data. the verdict is this pict.

(I adapt my scale x and y for good corrolation in this graph.)

The weird curve of 15 inch 2231 is
below at start ???
double slope is expression of bad caps no ???

What the f(...) with 2420. Bad soldering ??? bad caps ??? or

nightmare a war of clone !!!

It is possible to thrd part is expose this problem of maybe the other remplacement diaghram is not exact good response ???

So I will go at my start question what the life of CAPS
(according of the type) ???

Thanks again Guildo for this precious pict