Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Triangular ports question

  1. #1
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288

    Triangular ports question

    Hi all , my question is this , in some of the smaller JBL PA cabs they use triangular ports in the bottom corners. Would I be correct in assuming that these can be treated as if they are circular with the same cross sectional area.
    I'm using WIN ISD

    TIA

  2. #2
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    I'd do so.
    You can assume that the circular port is a bit too long.
    The final tuning will be done with portlength - as usual.
    ____________
    Peter
    Last edited by Hoerninger; 10-02-2010 at 09:19 AM. Reason: "long"

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    I thought that when using the cab walls as boundaries/edges to your port they are in 'effect' longer than the port length would indicate. There is a formula to take this into account but can't lay my hands on it.
    Cooky

  4. #4
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    Modifications?

    Are you changing the system from stock tuning?

    Ron
    JBL Pro for home use!

  5. #5
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288
    No Ron , trying to tune from scratch. Usual arrangement , two triangles in the bottom corners of the baffle , 2206 woof with horn in a box about 600 x 400 x 375.
    Win will give me a result for two circular ports of a given cross section , so my question is do I just transpose that area into a triangle. I suspect there is some change.

    Thx for responses gents

  6. #6
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288
    Like this

    Name:  ports.JPG
Views: 401
Size:  38.5 KB

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    End Corrections

    Quote Originally Posted by cooky1257 View Post
    I thought that when using the cab walls as boundaries/edges to your port they are in 'effect' longer than the port length would indicate. There is a formula to take this into account but can't lay my hands on it.
    Cooky
    The tube will act as if it were longer than it's physical length. You must add an end correction to each end of the tube.
    For a free standing end of a tube (not flanged), add 0.613 x radius of tube
    for a flanged end of a tube add 0.85 x radius of tube.

    Ruediger

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    Thanks!

  9. #9
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,095
    Here's another take on it, every time a triangular port shares a boundary, inside or out, the tuning will come down right about 1.3 to 1.5Hz. Also ports in close proximity to like enclosures will couple driving the tuning even lower. This is not an effect of mutual coupling of the drivers.

    Triangular ports also have the highest resistivity per area of any shape save a rectangle with a high aspect ratio, ie, a slot.

    Pictures and measurements posted on request.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  10. #10
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruediger View Post
    The tube will act as if it were longer than it's physical length. You must add an end correction to each end of the tube.
    For a free standing end of a tube (not flanged), add 0.613 x radius of tube
    for a flanged end of a tube add 0.85 x radius of tube.

    Ruediger
    thanks for that but I am a little confused. When you say that the tube ( triangular ) will behave as if it is longer than it actually is , then why add even more length , thereby making it seem even longer etc etc.
    Surely it will require a subtraction ?

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    Yep reduce.

  12. #12
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by cooky1257 View Post
    Yep reduce.
    Ah so. Cheers Cooky. I've spent the last couple of days mentally swooshing that one around.
    In the real world about 5% less than sims would indicate for a tubular port

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ingolstadt in Germany
    Posts
    456

    Yes, my statement was unclear

    Quote Originally Posted by macaroonie View Post
    thanks for that but I am a little confused. When you say that the tube ( triangular ) will behave as if it is longer than it actually is , then why add even more length , thereby making it seem even longer etc etc.
    Surely it will require a subtraction ?
    Right, my statement was unclear.

    To calculate the effective length, You must add the end corrections to the physical length.

    Find out if the program which You use already includes the end corrections.

    Ruediger

  14. #14
    RE: Member when? subwoof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    fingerlakes region, NY
    Posts
    1,899

    cleats

    hey there... put a pair of 3/4 plywood cleats long the side and bottom of the box where the ports will be. this way you can simply change the length of the "cover" to adjust the tuning.

    sub

  15. #15
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by subwoof View Post
    hey there... put a pair of 3/4 plywood cleats long the side and bottom of the box where the ports will be. this way you can simply change the length of the "cover" to adjust the tuning.

    sub
    Hi Mike , I don't quite get your meaning but I'm guessing a kind of sliding extra section to allow adjustment
    Thanks nonetheless Mac

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2245 Ports
    By sekess in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-07-2008, 03:53 AM
  2. Are the ports to big
    By Integrexman in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 10:24 PM
  3. Anyone Used Flexible PVC For Ports?
    By toddalin in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-09-2007, 12:55 AM
  4. Question re: Olympus Speaker Ports(?)
    By henflet in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-19-2006, 12:03 PM
  5. Aerodynamic Ports
    By Daniel B in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2003, 08:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •