Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 127A box

  1. #1
    Hans
    Guest

    127A box

    Hi, I've just got 2 JBL 127A in fairly good condition. Any of you who can help me (yes offcourse you can) with the net volume and the porting of a box to make these sound good? I would appreciate the smallest box possible.

    Hans

  2. #2
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    127A is one of a small group of JBL drivers, basically the vintage "Decade" woofers, well suited for closed-box alignments. EBP = 54 for 127A

    BB6P suggest really big boxes >10 cuft for venting, but they run out of cone displacement at low power. Looks great, but is impractical (red).

    Venting alignments <2 cuft behave like L100 - a boomy peak in the bass (orange). That's how JBL used them, typically.

    BB6P's suggested closed-box alignment is 2.75 cuft, but that size pushes the cone excursion limits. Use that, or a little smaller (2 - 2.5 cuft,) if you're willing to keep the SPL under control (blue).

    My experimental 127As are out for refoam right now. They'll be going into an even smaller 1.5 cuft, a true acoustic suspension alignment, without excursion limit, due to box damping (violet).

    You can see from the graphs, that basically provides L100 equivalent bass without the boom.

    More on my recent adventures with closed boxes here:

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...ad.php?t=12036
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #3
    Hans
    Guest

    Thanks

    Thanks a lot Zilch! I follow your ideeas and build a sealed 1.5 cuft box and we will see what the result will be. Please let us be in contact to exchange the results.

    Hans



    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch
    127A is one of a small group of JBL drivers, basically the vintage "Decade" woofers, well suited for closed-box alignments. EBP = 54 for 127A

    BB6P suggest really big boxes >10 cuft for venting, but they run out of cone displacement at low power. Looks great, but is impractical (red).

    Venting alignments <2 cuft behave like L100 - a boomy peak in the bass (orange). That's how JBL used them, typically.

    BB6P's suggested closed-box alignment is 2.75 cuft, but that size pushes the cone excursion limits. Use that, or a little smaller (2 - 2.5 cuft,) if you're willing to keep the SPL under control (blue).

    My experimental 127As are out for refoam right now. They'll be going into an even smaller 1.5 cuft, a true acoustic suspension alignment, without excursion limit, due to box damping (violet).

    You can see from the graphs, that basically provides L100 equivalent bass without the boom.

    More on my recent adventures in this area here:

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...ad.php?t=12036

  4. #4
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Good!

    We'll compare results here, good or bad, for everyone to see....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Dance Club Sub Box Help!
    By SMKSoundPro in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 10-08-2006, 09:34 PM
  2. Best 2226h box.
    By matsj in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-14-2006, 01:45 PM
  3. box for 2243
    By Jakob in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-10-2006, 10:30 AM
  4. Missing Link - Box Tuning
    By Zilch in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-03-2006, 11:37 AM
  5. Cabinet size vs. port displacement
    By johnaec in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-15-2005, 07:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •