Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48

Thread: Plan B (aka, fun with virtual graph paper)

  1. #16
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Me's welcome :-) No judo chops, please.

    My project? Hmm.. well, my components will certainly end up in a project and will
    hopefully benefit from discussion here. It appeared that several others had a similar
    component set and some interest in putting them together. Horns should arrive in
    the next few days

    -grumpy

  2. #17
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    2352 horns came in. Just had to listen to those 2435's ... doing so now
    Setting on 4430 bottom end with the HF peaking circuit dialed way back.
    After a few recordings I'm pretty pleased with the potential of this pairing,
    and having a hard time imagining (personally) needing more high-end
    frequency extension. Will try to run a WT2 impedance plot tomorrow.

    -grumpy

    BTW, ain't gaffer's tape great ? (haven't drilled horn/driver flange yet)

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    38
    No dimention shall be less than 1/3 any other dimention of the enclosure.
    audition - noun The sense, ability,
    or "power of hearing".

  4. #19
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Thanks for the "rule of thumb" suggestion, er mandate
    to aid in confining my dimentia.

  5. #20
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    What I'm using right now (1 kHz) for 2435HPL on 2352 with single 2235H in 4507, two ports closed. Tag an L-Pad on the HF out to adjust. Drop the bypass caps if you build with Solens (cheaper, actually). Inductors are Jantzens: L1 = 14 Ga., L2 & L3 = 20 Ga.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #21
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Thanks Zilch. I'll have to see what's missing in my current parts bin
    -grumpy

  7. #22
    Senior Member UreiCollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NY. USA.
    Posts
    230

    plans

    Grumpy,

    I like the looks of what you have planned. My personal guideline has always been to avoid any dimension that approaches 1/2 wavelength of my high frequency cutoff (plus 1 octave) for the given woofer. Given that your using such a large horn, I would imagine your cutoff will be pretty low in freq, thus allowing your largest dimension to be fairly big.

    I have not experimented with varying box size/shape with constant volume, but have made many enclosures with internal depths in the 14-24 inch range without significant issues.

    I would also recommend a generous amount of absorption on the rear wall of the cabinet, to try to “kill that reflection” off the rear wall, from bouncing back into the rear of the cone….perhaps even adding an angled surface behind the woofer to “redirect” that reflection away from the back of the cone.

    I think personal preference will come in to play as well....some, for example, don't like horns at all, and prefer the sound of an open dome.......I personally love horns. But of course, we should not ignore the opinions of others.

    I’m sure you have put a lot of thought into these, and just wanted to add my personal ideas. Good luck!



    I think your desire to build a non-room-intrusive speaker is realistic, and should not be ignored, as you have to live with and love these when they are finished.
    Frederick

  8. #23
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Thanks Frederick,

    "a lot of thought" might be stretching things a bit Concern about the
    cab depth (lack thereof) and possible issues/solutions seems to be a primary
    constructive criticism, and I appreciate the input/ideas. No concrete has been
    poured yet, so I'm flexible

    -grumpy

  9. #24
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743

    WT2 (version 2.00)

    OK, 2435HPL on 2352 and unterminated (have yet to build a test pipe)...

    both on floor pointed to 8' ceiling, horn w/o baffle, just floor nearby.

    Roughness on horn plot... room noise coupling back? or ??? (not exactly a
    quiet environment at my house) Will try a higher drive level later.

    -grumpy
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  10. #25
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Earl can give precise guidance here, but it looks good for 1 kHz, maybe not much lower, tho....

  11. #26
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    That's about what I expected, and what I gleaned from these plots as well.
    Fortunately, that's how I expect to use them as well.
    Will be interesting to experiment and see what effect boundaries/baffle
    will have & compare w/ literature. -grumpy

  12. #27
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963

    For comparison,

    I did:

    1) 2435HPL on 2352 - same result, basically.

    2) 2452H-SL on same - will play lower, if desired.

    3) My plots are 100 points, which has inherent smoothing. I repeated 2435 at 1000 points to see if it is actually raggedy.

    Well, somewhat.

    I'm set at 2000 uA test current.
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  13. #28
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Cool... thanks for the verification!
    Need measurement tools before more compression drivers

    -grumpy

    Edit: Other than small bumps above 2KHz, unterminated looks a lot like the published
    PWT impedance plot. Interesting (a little) that your example has elevated impedance
    values on the top end when unterminated (or odd that mine does not). Will have to
    build one (PWT) once I get a mic that's useful for that sort of thing ... just don't hold
    your breath

  14. #29
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    I didn't do unterminated (no horn, I presume). My second plot is a different (4" Aquaplas'd Optimized Aperture) driver, for comparison of cutoff frequencies of different horn/driver combinations.

    [Fodder especially for Earl.... ]

  15. #30
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Ah, well that makes much more sense regarding several features of the center plot 2451-SL? an SL-ized 2447? 2452-SL (the current Zilch darling )?

    Yes, by unterminated i meant with no horn. -grumpy

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •