'zactly, Zilch.Originally Posted by Zilch
Regarding lobing in my first post, I was talking about interference-induced lobing effects from multiple drivers reproducing the same frequency, specifically a midrange and horn through the crossover region. This would cause strange irregularies in frequency response in the range of frequencies near the crossover point as your ears move off-axis. The same lobing problem would be true for multiple horns or multiple drivers of any type, but who wants or needs that in home hi-fi anyway?
Back to diffaction: To me, that is exactly what the "lips" for the Smith horns are for: to maintain pattern control in the vertical plane to a much lower frequency than the wood horn can do alone. In the case of a smith horn, it sticks way out beyond the baffle, so diffraction pattern at low frequencies would be even more than 180*, right? Talk about reflection problems?
What I was getting at is that a smaller horn allows you to get the drivers closer together (midrange and tweeter, for example) and that reduces the off-axis irregularity problems in the frequency range near the crossover frequency, but if one is driving a horn, you must realize that the horn will turn into a diffraction slot with near 180-degree dispersion if used down to a frequency lower than the small mouth dimension can control. If you want 180-degree dispersion, fine. But if you are trying to control the dispersion pattern, you must use the horn above the frequency where pattern control becomes effective.