We had this same discussion several months ago, actually:
http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...ead.php?t=9493.
What Superbee does not yet appreciate is that his opinion regarding S7 is largely irrelevant to any discussion of comparative merits. Thus, he reiterates his opinion four times in this thread in what he believes to be counterpoint to the several rational and objective arguments posed here. It's simple non sequitur, is what.
In ultimate exasperation, Bee defends his opinion with expetives, slamming the purveyors of fact and, in the course, also revealing his contempt for the truth he doesn't understand.
In the spirt of these forums, I believe anyone would be hard pressed to find me ever myself having said anything negative about any JBL product discussed here. Instead, I intentionally strive to restrict my posting perspective to suggesting how even the worst of them might be improved in light of my own knowledge of what they are.
For this thread, however, I'm going to make an exception and express my opinion as opposition to Superbee's inane insistency:
By any objective standard of contemporary loudspeaker system performance evaluation, which includes me hearing and "feeling" them in comparison to many others, taken overall, Olympus S7's REALLY, REALLY SUCK!
I trust this will in no way diminish Superbee's (or anyone else's) enjoyment of them, of course....