Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 4435+2404H

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    20

    4435+2404H

    I suppose a few 4435 owners have experienced adding 2404H tweeters. What is the best location ? inside the cabinet ( and where) or in a small box over the top, so as they 'll be vertcally aligned with the 2426?
    I'll have no problems with the crossovers as I have a couple of 5 way Rane AC 23 active crossovers with time delay adjustment and several amplifiers, so I can shunt the original crossovers for the experiment.
    Thanks for your reply.
    Squirrel

  2. #2
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    A couple of people have tried it. It's not a commonly installed modification.

    Why? It messes up a good design.

    Your Rane's not going to get it.

    If you were talking DEQX, then, maybe.

    Let it be....

  3. #3
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,200
    Zilch has some good points but if want to try it. It's not a simple modification. If you look at the voltage drives you can see why. I used the CD compensation from the passive network in an active set-up, it yeilded the best performance no contest. I tried running the 2344 with CD compensation from an active crossover and it didn't cut it. Too much roll off above 10K. You could use that to your advantage incorporating a tweeter. Part of the problem is the transition between the woofer and the compression driver is not symetrical and then you have the horn compensation complicated with tweeter integration. If you tried it I would go 3 way active, shift around the crossover a bit between the woofer and compression driver for smoothest response, use CD comp on the compression driver and try an 8-10K crossover on the 2404. Voltage drives courtesy of Giskard.

    Rob
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #4
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    And you should make sure your 2404's use the lightweight D16R2405 diaphragms!

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    20
    HI Rob, ZILCH and GUIDO
    Thanks for your infos, I did not answer immediately because it took me time to do the experiment.I give you my firts results in the thread " 4435+ Active crossovers.
    Thanks and best regards.
    squirrel

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido View Post
    And you should make sure your 2404's use the lightweight D16R2405 diaphragms!
    Hi Guido
    How can I know the reference of the diaphragm mounted inside the 2404H?

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    20

    4435+2404 H

    Hi Robb
    Could you give me some precision about the CD compensation process?
    I read in the rane pro audio reference that it was an equalisation applied to avoid an upward tilted emission lobe;Thanks for your reply
    Squirrel

  8. #8
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Quote Originally Posted by Squirrel View Post
    Hi Guido
    How can I know the reference of the diaphragm mounted inside the 2404H?
    Honestly I don't know.
    What I know is that some 2404 versions use the D8R075 diaphragm which handles more power but has less extension above 16 kHz.

  9. #9
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    If your UHF response is falling above 18 kHz, chances are it's 2402 diaphragm.

    The FR differences are documented in several threads in these forums.

    Try "Ring Radiator Comparisons" for starters, also "Mini DIY."

  10. #10
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,200
    Hi Robb
    Could you give me some precision about the CD compensation process?
    Hello Squirrel

    If you look at a compression driver measured on a plane wave tube the response falls off above the mass break point at about 6dB per octave. Traditional horns like an exponential as an example have a directivity that increases with frequency. What that does is raise the on axis level at a rate that complements the natural rolloff of the driver. The higher in frequency you go the higher the directivity is. With that type of horn the directivity equalizes the on axis response so it measures flat. With a Constant Directivity horn like the 2344 this does not happen. The horn is designed to have Constant Directivity over the operating frequency range so the response on axis looks just like the plain wave tube measurement. With that type of horn you need to use the crossover to perform the compensation. That is the CD compensation I was taking about. With the 2344 the basic EQ was done rather elegantly by using a simple series cap. What the cap does is trade off the lower mid band effciency to level out the response on the horn. Since the cap acts as 6db per octave high pass filter the resultant curve goes a long was to acheive the desired response.

    Read the profile on the 4430 and the Improvements in Monitors documents on the site:

    http://audioheritage.csdco.com/vbull...6021#post76021

    http://www.audioheritage.org/html/pr...bl/4430-35.htm

    Rob

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    20

    Smile CD horn compensation

    Hello Robh,
    Thank you for your precise explanations and for the documents' references. They are very interesting for me, as you may have guessed, I' m not a specialist in speaker systems.
    Best regards
    Squirrel

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4435 versions
    By Squirrel in forum Miscellaneous Gear
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-16-2006, 01:32 AM
  2. 4430/B40 vs 4435
    By leif in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 02-26-2006, 12:44 PM
  3. Wall thickness 4435?
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-28-2005, 03:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •