Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: 2213H Xmech

  1. #1
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653

    Question 2213H Xmech

    anyone knows Xmech (one way) parameter of the 2213H woofer ?

    Thx

  2. #2
    Member ROSSO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by ratitifb View Post
    anyone knows Xmech (one way) parameter of the 2213H woofer ?

    Thx
    http://www.jblpro.com/catalog/suppor...1075&doctype=3

  3. #3
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,200
    The JBL T/S sheets have X-Max not X-Mech. One is still linear travel the other is before damage. If you hang the coil on the top plate kiss it good buy.

    Why are you asking??

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  4. #4
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    The JBL T/S sheets have X-Max not X-Mech. One is still linear travel the other is before damage. If you hang the coil on the top plate kiss it good buy.


    Xmax = 7.87mm when Xmech = ???

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Why are you asking??

    Rob
    for my technical understanding about the mechanical limits of this great driver. Is failure mode due to

    - Spider crashing on top plate
    - Voice coil bottoming on back plate
    - Voice coil coming out of gap above core
    - Physical limitation of cone.

    and to estimate the max power handling capacity (peak) before mechanical damage without any consideration regarding the distortion level

  5. #5
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,200
    Asside from curiosity you shouldn't be running any drivers beyond X-max. To run them to X-mech is asking for trouble.

    Who cares how they fail? The point is to be a responsible owner and not abuse them to the point where they do fail. They are vintage drivers and should be treated so.


    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  6. #6
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Asside from curiosity you shouldn't be running any drivers beyond X-max. To run them to X-mech is asking for trouble.
    I agree but unfortunately while you are running to Xmax
    the dynamics of a recorded sound track shows sometimes some surprise :dont-know

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Who cares how they fail? The point is to be a responsible owner and not abuse them to the point where they do fail. They are vintage drivers and should be treated so
    Rob
    My question is precisely to avoid such inconvenience

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...0&postcount=59

  7. #7
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,200
    My question is precisely to avoid such inconvenience
    Understood. Just use JBL's old common sense approach if you see excessive cone movement either highpass filter them or turn it down.

    It's not like you can plan for what's on a new recording. Just don't go loud the first time through.

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  8. #8
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Agreed, a subsonic filter is always a good idea with a vented cabinet.
    I have several songs with strange very very *very* low frequency contents (some prodigy remixes for example) that I would not want to play loud on an unprotected louspeaker!

  9. #9
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653

    Wink Ok ok ok

    but ....

    anyone knows Xmech (one way) parameter of the 2213H woofer ?

    (in mm or inch)

  10. #10
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    try and tell us

  11. #11
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    try and tell us



    by mechanical design considerations (voice coil, top plate, centering, ...) i think it'll be possible to estimate X-mech ...

  12. #12
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    taking appart cone/spider/surround behavior at high excursion level and according to a picture from a cutaway of the 123A magnet, we can imagine that the first X-mech mode of failure is due to spider crashing on the top plate (backward excursion). This picture shows a X-mech around the value of the thickness of the top plate (actually a bit higher)...

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Christchurch, NZ
    Posts
    1,400
    I would tend to only worry about Xmax. If you are going past this point the life of the driver is not going to be very long. When approaching X- mech the worst thing that can happen is that the voice coil jumps out of the gap and hangs on the top plate. You may get away with it once or twice but ultimately the coil will fail and you will need a recone. IMO one would be wise to stay away from X-max and X-mech. The number is really quite pointless to know because once you have figured it out you will be opening up your wallett for a recone kit.

    Allan.

  14. #14
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by Allanvh5150 View Post
    I would tend to only worry about Xmax. If you are going past this point the life of the driver is not going to be very long. When approaching X- mech the worst thing that can happen is that the voice coil jumps out of the gap and hangs on the top plate. You may get away with it once or twice but ultimately the coil will fail and you will need a recone. IMO one would be wise to stay away from X-max and X-mech. The number is really quite pointless to know because once you have figured it out you will be opening up your wallett for a recone kit.

    Allan.
    totaly agreed

    but just before the voice coil jumps out of the gap i think the spider should have crashing itself on the top plate
    In that case we'll hear some poping noise before voice coil damage

    (my goal is not running 2213H to Xmech (even Xmax) but technical understanding on this driver)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2213H edge treatment ooze
    By cohearent in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-13-2008, 10:07 AM
  2. 2213H popping
    By TXSURF in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-29-2007, 10:07 PM
  3. two 2213H for subwoofer?
    By MatthiasA in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-19-2006, 02:05 PM
  4. 128H 2213H
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-10-2006, 04:08 PM
  5. Box for 2213H
    By Hans in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-11-2005, 08:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •