Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: 5 cu-ft bass boxes for 2225H

  1. #16
    jbl
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch
    Hi, Ron!

    Plug one of the ports with 3" plumbers' test plugs and tell us what you hear, please....
    Hi Zilch,
    I tryed your suggestion and here's what I found:
    First off, I attempted this as a listening test with various CDs. I didn't check WIN Isd before listening so that I would be open to what I was hearing.
    The overall sound was about the same, except on a Bob James CD. There was a noticable dip at about 40 Hz. The result was a muddying effect. I didn't hear it on all CDs, but taking out he plug corrected it on that disc. I'll try more CDs over the weekend.

    Ron

  2. #17
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by jbl
    The result was a muddying effect.
    Have Zilch check the group delay in BB6P. Stock and then with one port blocked.

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    - This entire line of reasoning ( running a 2225H in a cabinet tuned below the speakers resonance and operated in a system alignment that is less than a "critical alignment ) is iffy at best .

    - I'll admit it's a great way to magically turn the short coil 2225 into a long coil 2235 ( after you've had the recone kit installed ).

    - I realize that in home HiFi it seems that almost anything goes but that doesn't make it right ( or best practise ). What's happened to using the right tool for the job ?

    - I've used 24 , 2225Hs in system alignments that are critically damped while being tuned to 52 hz for over two decades. I've never burnt a coil or had one toss its' cookies and leave the gap ( & this is SR work ). These were all used without subs for a good 15 years. They do a fantastic job at creating fake bass when electronically enhanced ( LF boost ) & used in conjunction with a VLF high pass filter. Treat the 2225 right and it'll last forever. It's a great driver .

    - The 4671 ( Cabaret ) had terrible unloading problems due to the system tuning being too low and the 2225H operating in an oversized enclosure. Yes, you can "derate" the input power for such practice / but in SR ? / & in real life ? / it just never happens & things just blowup .

    - There are reasons to not tune these speakers below their Fs ( at least this & previous generations of JBL woofers ) . Perhaps the newer deep-gappers ( 1/2" deep ) can withstand this abuse better / I don't know since so far I haven't persued answering that specific question.



  4. #19
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K
    Perhaps the newer deep-gappers ( 1/2" deep ) can withstand this abuse better / I don't know since so far I haven't persued answering that specific question.
    They can and do but...

    In any case, nice post Earl. It looks like both you and Zilch appreciate the "right tool for the job" concept that I've been trying to convey since day one. There really is a reason why the 2225H is labeled a "2225H" and the 2235H is labeled a "2235H" and neither is labeled "all purpose woofer".

  5. #20
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Group delay of 2225H and 2235H in 5 cuft 4507 box per BB6P.

    2225H:

    Black = stock, 4 ports open, ~40 Hz tuning
    Orange = 1 port closed, ~35 Hz
    Red = 2 ports closed, ~28 Hz

    2235H:

    Green = 1 port closed, ~35 Hz
    Blue = 2 ports closed, what I normally run here, ~28 Hz
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #21
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Interesting Zilch... So he can hear that change in transient character eh?

  7. #22
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Giskard
    Interesting Zilch... So he can hear that change in transient character eh?
    Seems pretty minor, no? And all well below the Blauert & Laws curve of group delay audibility.

    In my experience, just about any change I make I'm gonna be hearing a difference in some instrument on some cut on one test CD or another. It may be a room or box resonance in this low range, as well.

    Just part of the fun of playin' with tunings.

    I'm with you and Earl here. As I said above, this ~35 Hz tuning is pushin' 2225H about as far as I can resonably conceive it playing well in this box. I do have some 2225H's here I could try myself to confirm....

  8. #23
    jbl
    Guest

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K
    - This entire line of reasoning ( running a 2225H in a cabinet tuned below the speakers resonance and operated in a system alignment that is less than a "critical alignment ) is iffy at best .

    - I'll admit it's a great way to magically turn the short coil 2225 into a long coil 2235 ( after you've had the recone kit installed ).

    - I realize that in home HiFi it seems that almost anything goes but that doesn't make it right ( or best practise ). What's happened to using the right tool for the job ?

    - I've used 24 , 2225Hs in system alignments that are critically damped while being tuned to 52 hz for over two decades. I've never burnt a coil or had one toss its' cookies and leave the gap ( & this is SR work ). These were all used without subs for a good 15 years. They do a fantastic job at creating fake bass when electronically enhanced ( LF boost ) & used in conjunction with a VLF high pass filter. Treat the 2225 right and it'll last forever. It's a great driver .

    - The 4671 ( Cabaret ) had terrible unloading problems due to the system tuning being too low and the 2225H operating in an oversized enclosure. Yes, you can "derate" the input power for such practice / but in SR ? / & in real life ? / it just never happens & things just blowup .

    - There are reasons to not tune these speakers below their Fs ( at least this & previous generations of JBL woofers ) . Perhaps the newer deep-gappers ( 1/2" deep ) can withstand this abuse better / I don't know since so far I haven't persued answering that specific question.


    Well said Earl. I'm VERY happy with the sound of the 4671 system. Been that way since 1985. Never felt the need for a sub. If I did, it would have been there a long time ago.

    Ron

  9. #24
    jbl
    Guest

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by jbl
    Well said Earl. I'm VERY happy with the sound of the 4671 system. Been that way since 1985. Never felt the need for a sub. If I did, it would have been there a long time ago.

    Ron
    Hi Zilch,
    Try your 2225 vs 2235 and tell us your impressions. Also, try the 2225 with 1 port closed and see if you hear what I heard.
    Thanks

  10. #25
    paragon
    Guest

    4508 with 2205A

    This was an 4508 (8 cf) with two 2205A. Very good speaker. Response to 40 Hz in corner. Old pic, no data. Think 2225 in 5 cf is similar.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  11. #26
    jbl
    Guest

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by paragon
    This was an 4508 (8 cf) with two 2205A. Very good speaker. Response to 40 Hz in corner. Old pic, no data. Think 2225 in 5 cf is similar.
    Yes. The response is the same.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Warning digital bass!
    By jarrods in forum Music
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-20-2009, 01:35 PM
  2. Bass Terminology
    By Ian Mackenzie in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-18-2005, 12:38 PM
  3. How to increase the bass signal on JBL 4671OK
    By janly in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-13-2005, 03:25 PM
  4. No more bass with my new caps on 43xx clone
    By gerard in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 10:50 AM
  5. Bass testing your favourite amps
    By Ian Mackenzie in forum Professional Amps
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 06-25-2004, 12:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •