Many thanks, Grumpy. At least "Techote33" has the sensitivity v distortion curves that speak volumes. I have the 2008 T\S spreadsheet, which as I've reported has disinformation.
Type: Posts; User: RCAguy; Keyword(s):
Many thanks, Grumpy. At least "Techote33" has the sensitivity v distortion curves that speak volumes. I have the 2008 T\S spreadsheet, which as I've reported has disinformation.
Thanks, Mike. But I don't quite understand "The TH specs for the 2265H are on page 5 of link to the PDF page." Where exactly is this? Are these the "full specs" as I've seen for the 2262 and 2268?...
JBL's Thiele-Small data of 2008 has errors: the Le of the 2268 at zero excursion on their full specs and as measured on two specimens is 1.40mH, not the 1.85 listed. And boo to Samsung for deleting...